Wells Ashley, Miller Michael E, Chen Haiying, Laurienti Paul J, Kritchevsky Stephen B, Thompson Atalie C
Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Jun;73(6):1772-1778. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19526. Epub 2025 May 20.
Impaired contrast sensitivity (CS) commonly occurs in older adults but has been largely overlooked as a contributing factor to functional impairment and decline. We examined if CS impairment predicts decline in performance on the expanded short physical performance battery (eSPPB) over 30 months of follow-up in cognitively healthy older adults.
Single center prospective cohort study of 192 cognitively unimpaired older adults with good visual acuity and self-reported visual function. Linear mixed models examined the difference in the association of moderately impaired baseline CS (logCS < 1.55) with performance on the eSPPB and its components-balance, 4 m gait speed, narrow walk, and chair pace-over 30 months. Multivariable models adjusted for the effect of age, race, and sex on the slopes over time.
At baseline, the mean participant age was 76.5 ± 4.7 years, with 56.5% (N = 108) female and 9.4% (N = 18) black. Participants with moderately impaired CS at baseline had a significantly faster decline in eSPPB over a 30-month period (Beta: -0.115, 95% CI (-0.180, -0.050), p < 0.001) compared with those with normal CS (Beta: -0.022, 95% CI (-0.044, -0.001), p = 0.042). There was a difference in slopes of -0.093 units/year ((95% CI, -0.161, -0.024), p = 0.009) between groups. This difference in slopes remained significant after adjusting for the effect of age, sex, and race (difference in slopes -0.086, 95% CI (-0.155, -0.016), p = 0.016). Impaired CS predicted significantly greater declines in balance over 30 months (difference in slopes -3.512 (-6.826, -0.199), p = 0.0378), but the differences in gait speed, narrow walk, and chair pace were not significant.
In cognitively intact older adults with good visual acuity, moderately impaired CS was associated with a significantly faster decline in eSPPB, especially balance, over 30 months of follow-up. A relatively simple test of vision may identify a subset of older adults without cognitive dysfunction who are at risk for mobility decline.
对比敏感度(CS)受损在老年人中普遍存在,但在很大程度上被忽视是导致功能障碍和衰退的一个因素。我们研究了在认知健康的老年人中,CS受损是否能预测在30个月的随访期内,扩展简短体能测试电池(eSPPB)的表现下降。
对192名认知未受损、视力良好且自我报告视觉功能正常的老年人进行单中心前瞻性队列研究。线性混合模型研究了基线CS中度受损(logCS < 1.55)与eSPPB及其组成部分——平衡、4米步速、窄道行走和椅子起立速度在30个月内的表现之间的关联差异。多变量模型对年龄、种族和性别随时间变化的斜率影响进行了调整。
基线时,参与者的平均年龄为76.5±4.7岁,女性占56.5%(N = 108),黑人占9.4%(N = 18)。与CS正常的参与者相比,基线时CS中度受损的参与者在30个月内eSPPB的下降明显更快(β:-0.115,95%置信区间(-0.180,-0.050),p < 0.001)(β:-0.022, 95%置信区间(-0.044,-0.001),p = 0.042)。两组之间的斜率差异为-0.093单位/年((95%置信区间,-0.161,-0.024),p = 0.009)。在调整年龄、性别和种族的影响后,这种斜率差异仍然显著(斜率差异为-0.086,95%置信区间(-0.155,-0.016),p = 0.016)。CS受损预测在30个月内平衡能力下降显著更大(斜率差异为-3.512(-6.826,-0.199),p = 0.0378),但步速、窄道行走和椅子起立速度的差异不显著。
在视力良好的认知未受损老年人中,CS中度受损与在30个月的随访期内eSPPB,尤其是平衡能力的显著更快下降有关。一个相对简单的视力测试可能会识别出一部分没有认知功能障碍但有行动能力下降风险的老年人。