• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学龄前儿童的高阶逻辑推理:来自语调与量词辖域的证据

Higher-Order Logical Reasoning in Preschool Children: Evidence from Intonation and Quantifier Scope.

作者信息

Sauerland Uli, Sugawara Ayaka, Yatsushiro Kazuko

机构信息

Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics, Berlin, Germany.

Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Open Res Eur. 2025 Feb 3;5:34. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18312.1. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.18312.1
PMID:40391027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12086508/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Logical reasoning in young children is difficult to ascertain experimentally even for single propositional operators. We present a novel argument that four- and five-year old children are capable of reasoning with complex representations containing multiple logical operators.

METHODS

The argument is based on an interaction between sentence interpretation and intonation. This interaction depends on the computation of logical inferences between the sentence uttered and possible alternative utterances containing proportional generalized quantifiers, and how adults arrive at different interpretations is well understood. The account that explains the interaction predicts that a specific intonation will disambiguate scopal interpretation in sentences with a negation and a universal quantifier, but not in sentences involving two quantifiers.

RESULTS

We show that preschool children speaking German are sensitive to the interaction between logical scope of expressions and intonation in the same way as adult speakers.

CONCLUSION

This result entails that preschool children can carry out logical reasoning within a higher order logic.

摘要

背景

即使对于单个命题运算符,幼儿的逻辑推理也很难通过实验来确定。我们提出了一个新颖的观点,即四五岁的儿童能够对包含多个逻辑运算符的复杂表征进行推理。

方法

该观点基于句子解释与语调之间的相互作用。这种相互作用取决于所说出的句子与包含比例广义量词的可能替代句子之间的逻辑推理计算,并且成年人如何得出不同的解释已得到充分理解。解释这种相互作用的理论预测,特定的语调将消除带有否定词和全称量词的句子中的辖域解释歧义,但在涉及两个量词的句子中则不然。

结果

我们表明,说德语的学龄前儿童与成年说话者一样,对表达式的逻辑辖域与语调之间的相互作用敏感。

结论

这一结果意味着学龄前儿童能够在高阶逻辑中进行逻辑推理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9d3/12086508/3f87cfa330b9/openreseurope-5-19789-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9d3/12086508/5b9aa7cfabd4/openreseurope-5-19789-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9d3/12086508/7f82d145f814/openreseurope-5-19789-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9d3/12086508/04e31fc02719/openreseurope-5-19789-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9d3/12086508/e0d511597397/openreseurope-5-19789-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9d3/12086508/f830a483be2a/openreseurope-5-19789-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9d3/12086508/3f87cfa330b9/openreseurope-5-19789-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9d3/12086508/5b9aa7cfabd4/openreseurope-5-19789-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9d3/12086508/7f82d145f814/openreseurope-5-19789-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9d3/12086508/04e31fc02719/openreseurope-5-19789-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9d3/12086508/e0d511597397/openreseurope-5-19789-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9d3/12086508/f830a483be2a/openreseurope-5-19789-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9d3/12086508/3f87cfa330b9/openreseurope-5-19789-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Higher-Order Logical Reasoning in Preschool Children: Evidence from Intonation and Quantifier Scope.学龄前儿童的高阶逻辑推理:来自语调与量词辖域的证据
Open Res Eur. 2025 Feb 3;5:34. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18312.1. eCollection 2025.
2
The logic in language: How all quantifiers are alike, but each quantifier is different.语言中的逻辑:所有量词如何相似,但每个量词又如何不同。
Cogn Psychol. 2016 Jun;87:29-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 28.
3
Toddlers' understanding and use of verbal negation in inferential reasoning search tasks.幼儿在推理搜索任务中对言语否定的理解和使用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Jul;183:222-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
4
Class inclusion versus quantifiers comprehension tasks: an experimental study with school-aged children.类包含与量词理解任务:一项针对学龄儿童的实验研究。
Cogn Process. 2021 Feb;22(1):151-158. doi: 10.1007/s10339-020-00995-3. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
How do people construct logical form during language comprehension?人们在语言理解过程中如何构建逻辑形式?
Psychol Sci. 2010 Aug;21(8):1090-7. doi: 10.1177/0956797610375446. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
6
On children's variable success with scalar inferences: Insights from disjunction in the scope of a universal quantifier.儿童在数量推断上的变化性成功:来自普遍量词辖域中析取的启示。
Cognition. 2018 Sep;178:178-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.020. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
7
The Compositionality of Logical Connectives in Child Italian.儿童意大利语中逻辑连接词的组合性
J Psycholinguist Res. 2018 Dec;47(6):1243-1277. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9596-1.
8
It's not just what we don't know: The mapping problem in the acquisition of negation.不仅仅是我们不知道的:否定习得中的映射问题。
Cogn Psychol. 2023 Sep;145:101592. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101592. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
9
The interpretation of logical connectives in Turkish.土耳其语中逻辑连接词的解释。
J Child Lang. 2016 Jul;43(4):784-810. doi: 10.1017/S0305000915000306. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
10
The capacity to generate alternative ideas is more important than inhibition for logical reasoning in preschool-age children.对于学龄前儿童的逻辑推理而言,产生替代想法的能力比抑制能力更为重要。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Feb;45(2):208-220. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0653-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Why Do Children Think Words Are Mutually Exclusive?为什么儿童认为词语是相互排斥的?
Psychol Sci. 2024 Dec;35(12):1315-1324. doi: 10.1177/09567976241287732. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
2
Evidence for compositionality in baboons (Papio papio) through the test case of negation.通过否定测试案例,证明狒狒(Papio papio)具有组合性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 10;12(1):19181. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21143-1.
3
The development of reasoning by exclusion in infancy.婴儿期排除推理的发展。
Cogn Psychol. 2022 Jun;135:101473. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101473. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
4
The Emergence of Natural Language Quantification.自然语言量化的出现。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Feb;46(2):e13097. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13097.
5
Infants recruit logic to learn about the social world.婴儿利用逻辑来了解社会世界。
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 26;11(1):5999. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19734-5.
6
The Comparative Psychology of Intelligence: Some Thirty Years Later.《智力的比较心理学:三十年后》
Front Psychol. 2020 May 19;11:973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00973. eCollection 2020.
7
The Acquisition of Modal Concepts.情态概念的习得。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Jan;24(1):65-78. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
8
When (not) to Look for Contrastive Alternatives: The Role of Pitch Accent Type and Additive Particles.何时(不)寻找对比性替代项:音高重音类型和附加词的作用
Lang Speech. 2019 Dec;62(4):751-778. doi: 10.1177/0023830918814279. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
9
Precursors of logical reasoning in preverbal human infants.前语言人类婴儿逻辑推理的前兆。
Science. 2018 Mar 16;359(6381):1263-1266. doi: 10.1126/science.aao3539.
10
Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report.心理学定量研究期刊文章报告标准:APA 出版与传播委员会工作组报告。
Am Psychol. 2018 Jan;73(1):3-25. doi: 10.1037/amp0000191.