Oka Tomohiro, Kawamura Tomonori, Shirasaka Wataru
Department of Physical Therapy, Osaka Health Science University, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Public Health, Kobe University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe, Japan.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 May 20;145(1):304. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05916-7.
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Patients who experience hip fractures often undergo bipolar hip arthroplasty (BHA) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF); however, acute postoperative pain remains a significant concern, often delaying rehabilitation and impairing recovery. This study compared acute phase pain characteristics (intensity and trajectory, and duration of analgesic use) between BHA and ORIF. Previous studies have suggested that patients undergoing ORIF may experience higher pain levels than those undergoing BHA, although most assessments have been limited to single time points, which may not capture the full scope of postoperative pain.
This prospective cohort study was conducted between February and August 2024. Pain intensity was evaluated on postoperative day (POD) 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 using a numerical rating scale. Pain trajectories (slope and intercept) were calculated based on pain intensity assessed on POD 1, 3, 5, and 7. The duration of analgesia was assessed from the time of surgery until discontinuation. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to examine the effect of surgical type (0, BHA; 1, ORIF) on pain-related outcomes, adjusting for confounders including age, sex, preoperative C-reactive protein level, and operative duration.
Data from 48 patients who underwent BHA and 32 who underwent ORIF were analyzed. There were no significant differences in pain intensity between the groups on POD 1 and 3. However, pain was significantly greater in the ORIF group on POD 5 (p < 0.01), 7 (p < 0.01), and 14 (p < 0.01). Regression analysis revealed that surgery type significantly influenced pain intensity on POD 14 (β = 1.27, p = 0.01) and pain trajectory slope (β = 0.52, p = 0.03). The intercept and analgesic duration were not significantly different between the groups.
Acute phase postoperative pain characteristics differed between BHA and ORIF, highlighting the need for targeted pain management during recovery in patients undergoing ORIF.
引言/目的:经历髋部骨折的患者通常会接受双极髋置换术(BHA)或切开复位内固定术(ORIF);然而,术后急性疼痛仍然是一个重大问题,常常延迟康复并影响恢复。本研究比较了BHA和ORIF之间急性期疼痛特征(强度和轨迹,以及镇痛药物使用持续时间)。先前的研究表明,接受ORIF的患者可能比接受BHA的患者经历更高的疼痛水平,尽管大多数评估仅限于单个时间点,这可能无法全面反映术后疼痛情况。
这项前瞻性队列研究于2024年2月至8月进行。使用数字评分量表在术后第1、3、5、7和14天评估疼痛强度。根据术后第1、3、5和7天评估的疼痛强度计算疼痛轨迹(斜率和截距)。从手术时间到停药评估镇痛持续时间。进行多元线性回归分析,以检验手术类型(0,BHA;1,ORIF)对疼痛相关结局的影响,并对包括年龄、性别、术前C反应蛋白水平和手术持续时间在内的混杂因素进行校正。
分析了48例接受BHA和32例接受ORIF患者的数据。两组在术后第1天和第3天的疼痛强度无显著差异。然而,ORIF组在术后第5天(p < 0.01)、第7天(p < 0.01)和第14天(p < 0.01)的疼痛明显更大。回归分析显示,手术类型对术后第14天的疼痛强度(β = 1.27,p = 0.01)和疼痛轨迹斜率(β = 0.52,p = 0.03)有显著影响。两组之间的截距和镇痛持续时间无显著差异。
BHA和ORIF之间急性期术后疼痛特征不同,这突出了对接受ORIF的患者在恢复期间进行有针对性疼痛管理的必要性。