Zupa Margaret F, Rothenberger Scott D, Bauer Jessica G, Zheng Yihao, Johnson Amber E, Kinnee Ellen, Rosland Ann-Marie M
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Caring for Complex Chronic Conditions Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2511559. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.11559.
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among adults with type 2 diabetes in the US. Endocrinology and cardiology care may improve outcomes for these patients, but access to this care is limited for many patients by practitioner shortages in rural areas and other barriers.
To assess associations of geographic and sociodemographic factors with endocrinology and cardiology care receipt among adults with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease before and after widespread telemedicine uptake.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used electronic medical record and public geographic and infrastructure data at a large health system spanning urban and rural counties in Pennsylvania. Participants were adults with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease who received primary care from January 2018 to June 2022.
Patient-level geographic measures, including distance to clinic, public transit, and cellular data access, and sociodemographic factors, including age, gender, race, and neighborhood socioeconomic status.
The primary outcome was at least 1 outpatient visit with endocrinology or cardiology. Geospatial analysis assessed patient-level geographic factors using zip code centroids, and separate multivariable logistic regression models evaluated associations between variables and endocrinology and cardiology care receipt. Analyses were stratified by period before (January 1, 2018, to March 15, 2020) and after (March 16, 2020, to June 30, 2022) COVID-19 pandemic-related telemedicine uptake; mixed-effects models tested for differences between periods.
Of 9546 adults (mean [SD] age, 68.5 [10.0] years; 5854 male [61%]; 82 Asian [1%]; 930 Black [10%]; 8451 White [89%]; 7877 urban [83%]), 1747 received endocrinology care and 5578 received cardiology care. In the pretelemedicine period, distance to endocrinology clinic (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per 10 miles, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.84) and older age (aOR per 10 years, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.75) were associated with lower odds of receiving endocrinology care. In the posttelemedicine period, the aOR for distance to clinic increased, but that for older age decreased. Black patients were less likely than White patients to receive cardiology care in the pretelemedicine period (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.82), and this association persisted in the posttelemedicine period.
In this cohort study of adults with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, geographic and sociodemographic factors were associated with receipt of endocrinology and cardiology care. Widespread availability of telemedicine may enhance equitable access to endocrinology care for patients facing geographic barriers, but disparities in use of specialty care by age and race persisted in the posttelemedicine period.
在美国,动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病是2型糖尿病成年人的主要死因。内分泌科和心内科护理可能会改善这些患者的治疗结果,但由于农村地区从业者短缺和其他障碍,许多患者难以获得此类护理。
评估在广泛采用远程医疗前后,地理和社会人口因素与2型糖尿病和动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病成年人接受内分泌科和心内科护理之间的关联。
设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究使用了宾夕法尼亚州一个覆盖城乡县的大型医疗系统中的电子病历以及公共地理和基础设施数据。参与者为2018年1月至2022年6月接受初级护理的2型糖尿病和动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病成年人。
患者层面的地理指标,包括到诊所的距离、公共交通和移动数据接入情况,以及社会人口因素,包括年龄、性别、种族和社区社会经济地位。
主要结局是至少进行1次内分泌科或心内科门诊就诊。地理空间分析使用邮政编码中心评估患者层面的地理因素,单独的多变量逻辑回归模型评估变量与接受内分泌科和心内科护理之间的关联。分析按2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行相关远程医疗采用之前(2018年1月1日至2020年3月15日)和之后(2020年3月16日至2022年6月30日)的时期进行分层;混合效应模型检验不同时期之间的差异。
在9546名成年人中(平均[标准差]年龄为68.5[10.0]岁;5854名男性[61%];82名亚洲人[1%];930名黑人[10%];8451名白人[89%];7877名城市居民[83%]),1747人接受了内分泌科护理,5578人接受了心内科护理。在远程医疗之前的时期,到内分泌科诊所的距离(每10英里调整后的优势比[aOR]为0.74;95%置信区间[CI]为0.64 - 0.84)和年龄较大(每10岁aOR为0.70;95% CI为0.66 - 0.75)与接受内分泌科护理的较低几率相关。在远程医疗之后的时期,到诊所距离的aOR增加,但年龄较大的aOR降低。在远程医疗之前的时期,黑人患者比白人患者接受心内科护理的可能性更小(aOR为0.71;95% CI为0.60 - 0.82),并且这种关联在远程医疗之后的时期仍然存在。
在这项针对2型糖尿病和动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病成年人的队列研究中,地理和社会人口因素与接受内分泌科和心内科护理相关。远程医疗的广泛可用性可能会增强面临地理障碍的患者公平获得内分泌科护理的机会,但在远程医疗之后的时期,按年龄和种族划分的专科护理使用差异仍然存在。