Mulwa Francis, Balcazar Dario, Langat Solomon, Mutisya James, Chelangat Betty, McBride Carolyn S, Rose Noah, Powell Jeffrey, Sang Rosemary, Bastos Armanda, Gloria-Soria Andrea, Lutomiah Joel
Center for Virus Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Department of Entomology, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 May 20;19(5):e0013041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013041. eCollection 2025 May.
The Aedes aegypti mosquito is widespread in tropical and subtropical regions. There are two recognized subspecies; the invasive Aedes aegypti aegypti (Aaa) and the ancestral Aedes aegypti formosus (Aaf). Aaf is common throughout Kenya whereas Aaa, which was historically confined to coastal regions, has undergone a range expansion. In areas of sympatry, gene flow may lead to admixed populations with potential differences in vectorial capacity. We hypothesize that coastal Ae. aegypti populations have a higher proportion of Aaa ancestry than those from inland locations of Kenya, influenced by their distance to the coast.
Adult Ae. aegypti mosquitoes were collected using Biogent (BG) sentinel traps baited with carbon-dioxide (CO2) from cities and towns along the Kenyan northern transport corridor. Aedes aegypti population structure, genetic diversity, and isolation by distance were analyzed using genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) datasets generated with an Ae. aegypti microarray chip targeting ≈50,000 SNPs. Kenyan Aedes aegypti populations were placed into a global context within a phylogenetic tree, by combining the Kenyan dataset with a previously published global database.
A total of 67 Ae. aegypti mosquitoes population from Kenya were genotyped, we found that western Kenya Ae. aegypti constitute a genetically homogenous population that clusters with African Aaf, whereas coastal mosquitoes showed evidence of admixture between the two subspecies. There was a positive correlation (Observation = 0.869, p = 0.0023) between genetic distance (FST) and geographic distance, suggesting isolation by distance. The phylogenetic analysis and the genetic structure analysis suggest that an Asian Aaa population is the source of Aaa invasion into Kenya.
These results provide evidence of an emerging admixed population of Ae. aegypti in coastal Kenya between the sylvatic Aaf and the domesticated-human preferring Aaa. The observed gene flow from Aaa into Kenya may positively influence Ae. aegypti vectorial capacity, potentially increasing human feeding preference, biting rates and vector competence and could be promoting the observed dengue and chikungunya outbreaks.
埃及伊蚊在热带和亚热带地区广泛分布。已知有两个亚种;入侵性的埃及伊蚊指名亚种(Aaa)和原始的埃及伊蚊美索不达米亚亚种(Aaf)。Aaf在肯尼亚各地都很常见,而历史上局限于沿海地区的Aaa则经历了范围扩张。在同域分布地区,基因流动可能导致具有潜在媒介能力差异的混合种群。我们假设,受与海岸距离的影响,肯尼亚沿海的埃及伊蚊种群中Aaa血统的比例高于内陆地区的种群。
使用用二氧化碳(CO₂)诱饵的Biogent(BG)哨兵诱捕器,从肯尼亚北部交通走廊沿线的城镇收集成年埃及伊蚊。利用针对约50,000个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的埃及伊蚊微阵列芯片生成的全基因组SNP数据集,分析埃及伊蚊的种群结构、遗传多样性和距离隔离情况。通过将肯尼亚数据集与先前发表的全球数据库相结合,将肯尼亚埃及伊蚊种群置于系统发育树的全球背景中。
对来自肯尼亚的总共67个埃及伊蚊种群进行了基因分型,我们发现肯尼亚西部的埃及伊蚊构成了一个与非洲Aaf聚类的基因同质种群,而沿海蚊子显示出两个亚种之间混合的证据。遗传距离(FST)与地理距离之间存在正相关(观察值 = 0.869,p = 0.0023),表明存在距离隔离。系统发育分析和遗传结构分析表明,一个亚洲Aaa种群是Aaa入侵肯尼亚的来源。
这些结果提供了证据,表明在肯尼亚沿海地区,野生型Aaf和偏好人类的驯化型Aaa之间正在出现一个混合的埃及伊蚊种群。观察到的从Aaa流入肯尼亚的基因流动可能对埃及伊蚊的媒介能力产生积极影响,可能会增加人类叮咬偏好、叮咬率和媒介能力,并可能正在推动观察到的登革热和基孔肯雅热疫情。