Carr Caleb R, Gentile Nicole L, Bertolli Jeanne, Szewczyk Warren, Lin Jin-Mann S, Unger Elizabeth R, Vu Quan M, Sotoodehnia Nona, Fitzpatrick Annette L
University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 May 20;20(5):e0323104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323104. eCollection 2025.
Comparing the characteristics of patients with long COVID to those with other post-acute infection syndromes (PAIS) could potentially provide clues to common underlying disease processes that may affect patient recovery.
We identified records of patients who had documented SARS-CoV-2 tests in the University of Washington Medicine electronic health record (EHR) database from January 1, 2019, through January 31, 2022 (n = 139,472). Patients were classified into three groups: 1) long COVID defined by a positive SARS-CoV-2 test and a long COVID-related diagnosis code (n = 580); 2) recovered COVID defined by a positive test and no long COVID associated diagnosis codes (n = 7,437); and 3) non-COVID PAIS defined by a negative test, non-SARS-CoV-2 related PAIS diagnosis codes, and no COVID related codes (n = 106). Using multivariate logistic regression, we compared the clinical characteristics of these groups at three timeframes to address preclinical, acute and post-acute diagnoses: before index SARS-CoV-2 test, within 30 days of index test, and > 30 days after index test.
The long COVID group had a higher Charlson comorbidity index [median (IQR), 2 (0-4)] than the other two patient groups [median (IQR), 1 (0-3) and 1 (0-3)]. The long COVID and non-COVID PAIS patients were older and had greater smoking exposure than the recovered COVID group. Compared to the recovered COVID control group, the long COVID group had more health problems prior to the infection, including respiratory and metabolic as well as more severe infections and comorbidities based on the ICD codes found in the acute phase records. In the post-acute timeframe, many symptoms were more likely to be associated with long COVID than recovered patients with COVID-19 including abnormalities of heart beat [OR (95% CI), 5.31 (3.96-7.13)], cognition, perception, or emotional state symptoms [OR (95% CI), 5.14 (3.81-6.92)], malaise and fatigue [OR (95% CI), 4.20 (3.13-5.63)], and sleep disorders [OR (95% CI), 2.47, (1.79-3.43)], all p < 0.05. In contrast, the non-COVID PAIS group shared many similarities with the long COVID group across all three timeframes.
Patients diagnosed with long COVID were more similar to patients with a non-COVID-related PAIS than to recovered patients with COVID-19. This suggests risk factors for PAIS may be similar and independent of the infectious agent.
比较新冠长期症状患者与其他急性后感染综合征(PAIS)患者的特征,可能会为影响患者康复的常见潜在疾病过程提供线索。
我们在华盛顿大学医学电子健康记录(EHR)数据库中识别出2019年1月1日至2022年1月31日期间有记录的SARS-CoV-2检测患者记录(n = 139,472)。患者被分为三组:1)新冠长期症状组,定义为SARS-CoV-2检测呈阳性且有新冠长期症状相关诊断代码(n = 580);2)新冠康复组,定义为检测呈阳性但无新冠长期症状相关诊断代码(n = 7,437);3)非新冠PAIS组,定义为检测呈阴性、有非SARS-CoV-2相关PAIS诊断代码且无新冠相关代码(n = 106)。使用多因素逻辑回归,我们在三个时间框架内比较了这些组的临床特征,以探讨临床前、急性期和急性后期诊断:在首次SARS-CoV-2检测前、首次检测后30天内以及首次检测后>30天。
新冠长期症状组的Charlson合并症指数[中位数(四分位间距),2(0 - 4)]高于其他两组患者[中位数(四分位间距),1(0 - 3)和1(0 - 3)]。新冠长期症状组和非新冠PAIS组患者比新冠康复组患者年龄更大,吸烟暴露更多。与新冠康复对照组相比,新冠长期症状组在感染前有更多健康问题,包括呼吸和代谢问题以及根据急性期记录中的ICD代码显示的更严重感染和合并症。在急性后期,许多症状与新冠长期症状的关联比新冠康复患者更常见,包括心跳异常[比值比(95%置信区间),5.31(3.96 - 7.13)]、认知、感知或情绪状态症状[比值比(95%置信区间),5.14(3.81 - 6.92)]、不适和疲劳[比值比(95%置信区间),4.20(3.13 - 5.63)]以及睡眠障碍[比值比(95%置信区间),2.47,(1.79 - 3.43)],所有p < 0.05。相比之下,非新冠PAIS组在所有三个时间框架内与新冠长期症状组有许多相似之处。
被诊断为新冠长期症状的患者与非新冠相关PAIS患者比与新冠康复患者更相似。这表明PAIS的风险因素可能相似且与感染病原体无关。