Suppr超能文献

泪小点塞治疗干眼疾病的有效性和安全性如何?一项系统评价与Meta分析。

How effective and safe are punctal plugs in treating dry eye disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Chen Kai-Yang, Chan Hoi-Chun, Chan Chi-Ming

机构信息

School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

School of Pharmacy, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2025 May 19:102438. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2025.102438.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common multifactorial condition characterized by tear film instability and ocular discomfort, often treated with punctal plugs to enhance tear retention. Despite their widespread use, the efficacy, safety, and retention profiles of punctal plugs require comprehensive evaluation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of punctal plugs in managing DED, focusing on tear film stability, tear production, symptom relief, ocular surface integrity, and plug retention rates.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024559417). The search strategy included PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase for studies published up to January 2025, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Eligible studies involved adults with DED treated with punctal plugs, reporting outcomes such as tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer's test, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores, fluorescein and Rose Bengal staining, and retention rates. Data were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity (I2 statistic). Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane RoB2 (RCTs) and ROBINS-I (non-RCTs) tools, and publication bias was evaluated using Begg's and Egger's tests.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies (1,658patients) were included. Punctal plugs significantly improved TBUT (mean difference (MD): 1.8 s; 95 % CI: 1.8-1.9; p < 0.001), Schirmer's test scores (MD: 3.1 mm; 95 % CI: 3.1-3.2; p < 0.001), OSDI scores (MD: -20.6; 95 % CI: -21.3 to -19.9; p < 0.001), fluorescein staining (MD: -1.79; 95 % CI: -1.82 to -1.76; p < 0.001), and Rose Bengal staining (MD: -0.7; 95 % CI: -0.79 to -0.67; p < 0.001). Retention rates were high of 86 % (logit: 1.78; 95 % CI: 1.62-1.94) with smart plug showing high retention of 97.3 %. Heterogeneity was low (I = 0-24.1 %) across most outcomes. Evidence was moderate to high, supported by RCTs, though some cohort studies exhibited moderate bias in confounding, selection, and outcome measurement. Publication bias was minimal.

CONCLUSIONS

Punctal plugs are an effective and safe treatment for moderate-to-severe DED, significantly improving tear film stability, tear production, symptoms, and ocular surface health, with high retention rates. Low heterogeneity and minimal publication bias strengthen these findings, though moderate bias in some non-RCTs suggests caution. Future research should refine plug designs and address methodological limitations to optimize outcomes.

摘要

背景

干眼疾病(DED)是一种常见的多因素病症,其特征为泪膜不稳定和眼部不适,通常采用泪点塞来增强泪液潴留进行治疗。尽管泪点塞被广泛使用,但其疗效、安全性和留存情况仍需全面评估。

目的

评估泪点塞治疗干眼疾病的有效性和安全性,重点关注泪膜稳定性、泪液分泌、症状缓解、眼表完整性和泪点塞留存率。

方法

本系统评价和荟萃分析遵循PRISMA指南,并在PROSPERO(CRD42024559417)上注册。检索策略包括在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Scopus、科学网和Embase中检索截至2025年1月发表的研究,包括随机对照试验(RCT)和队列研究。符合条件的研究涉及接受泪点塞治疗的干眼成年患者,报告诸如泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)、泪液分泌试验、眼表疾病指数(OSDI)评分、荧光素和孟加拉玫瑰红染色以及留存率等结果。根据异质性(I²统计量)使用固定效应或随机效应模型合并数据。使用Cochrane RoB2(RCT)和ROBINS - I(非RCT)工具评估偏倚风险,并使用Begg检验和Egger检验评估发表偏倚。

结果

纳入了17项研究(1658例患者)。泪点塞显著改善了泪膜破裂时间(平均差值(MD):1.8秒;95%置信区间:1.8 - 1.9;p < 0.001)、泪液分泌试验评分(MD:3.1毫米;95%置信区间:3.1 - 3.2;p < 0.001)、眼表疾病指数评分(MD: - 20.6;95%置信区间: - 21.3至 - 19.9;p < 0.001)、荧光素染色(MD: - 1.79;95%置信区间: - 1.82至 - 1.76;p < 0.001)和孟加拉玫瑰红染色(MD: - 0.7;95%置信区间: - 0.79至 - 0.67;p < 0.001)。留存率较高,为86%(对数似然比:1.78;95%置信区间:1.62 - 1.94),智能泪点塞的留存率高达97.3%。大多数结果的异质性较低(I = 0 - 24.1%)。尽管一些队列研究在混杂、选择和结果测量方面存在中度偏倚,但随机对照试验支持的证据为中度至高度。发表偏倚最小。

结论

泪点塞是治疗中度至重度干眼疾病的一种有效且安全的方法,可显著改善泪膜稳定性、泪液分泌、症状和眼表健康,且留存率高。低异质性和最小发表偏倚强化了这些发现,不过一些非随机对照试验中的中度偏倚提示需谨慎。未来研究应改进泪点塞设计并解决方法学局限性以优化结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验