Green Adam, Patel Sharad, Crabtree Pamela, Patel Divyesha, Hoke Andrew, Orozco Ricardo Jaime, Sangah George, Mercado Alvin, Melchiorre Nicole, Charron Mariane, Chandel Abhimanyu, Puri Nitin
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cooper University Health Care and Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, 1 Cooper Plaza D429, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
Department of Quality Improvement, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ, USA.
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 May 20;25(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11134-8.
The efficacy of the SEP-1 Bundle has been questioned in the treatment of patients with hospital-acquired sepsis. We aimed to investigate bundle compliance and its association with survival in a subset of patients with HA sepsis: those with ICU-acquired sepsis.
A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary care referral hospital. Adult patients diagnosed with ICU-acquired sepsis between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2022 were identified. Survival to hospital discharge adjusted for disease severity based on 3-hour, 6-hour, and total bundle compliance was calculated. Secondary outcomes included the need for mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, initiation of acute hemodialysis, and discharge location.
Of 191 patients with ICU-acquired sepsis, 61 patients (31.9%) demonstrated total bundle compliance. There was no difference in survival based on the unadjusted analysis of 3-hour bundle compliance, compliant versus non-compliant (78.9% vs. 67.0%; P = 0.100). However, there was a survival benefit in 6-hour and total bundle, compliance versus non-compliance (82.2% vs. 60.0%, P < 0.001; 86.9% vs. 64.6%, P = 0.002). When adjusted for SOFA and CCI, logistic regression demonstrated similar results: 3-hour compliance (OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.29-1.18, P = 0.150), 6-hour compliance (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.17-0.68, P = 0.002) and total compliance (OR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.13-0.69, P = 0.006). Components of the SEP-1 Bundle that showed a mortality benefit included the collection of "blood cultures prior to antibiotic administration" (OR: 0.46; 95% CI 0.22-0.96, P = 0.037) and "tissue perfusion assessment" (OR: 0.41; 95% CI 0.18-0.90, P = 0.028).
Six-hour and total SEP-1 bundle compliance was associated with increased hospital survival in patients with ICU-acquired sepsis. These findings suggest the importance of sepsis bundle compliance in the ICU environment.
Not Applicable.
SEP-1集束化治疗方案在医院获得性脓毒症患者治疗中的疗效受到质疑。我们旨在调查一组医院获得性脓毒症患者(即重症监护病房获得性脓毒症患者)的集束化治疗方案依从性及其与生存率的关联。
在一家三级医疗转诊医院进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究。确定了2019年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间诊断为重症监护病房获得性脓毒症的成年患者。根据3小时、6小时和总集束化治疗方案依从性,计算调整疾病严重程度后的出院生存率。次要结局包括机械通气需求、血管升压药使用、急性血液透析启动及出院地点。
在191例重症监护病房获得性脓毒症患者中,61例(31.9%)完全依从集束化治疗方案。基于3小时集束化治疗方案依从性的未调整分析,依从组与非依从组的生存率无差异(78.9%对67.0%;P = 0.100)。然而,6小时和总集束化治疗方案依从组与非依从组在生存率上有获益(82.2%对60.0%,P < 0.001;86.9%对64.6%,P = 0.002)。在调整序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和Charlson合并症指数(CCI)后,逻辑回归显示了类似结果:3小时依从性(比值比:0.60;95%置信区间:0.29 - 1.18,P = 0.150),6小时依从性(比值比:0.35;95%置信区间:0.17 - 0.68,P = 0.002)和总依从性(比值比:0.31;95%置信区间:0.13 - 0.69,P = 0.006)。显示有死亡率获益的SEP-1集束化治疗方案组成部分包括“抗生素给药前采集血培养”(比值比:0.46;95%置信区间0.22 - 0.96,P = 0.037)和“组织灌注评估”(比值比:0.41;95%置信区间0.18 - 0.90,P = 0.028)。
6小时和总SEP-1集束化治疗方案依从性与重症监护病房获得性脓毒症患者的住院生存率增加相关。这些发现表明了在重症监护病房环境中脓毒症集束化治疗方案依从性的重要性。
不适用。