Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房获得性脓毒症患者中脓毒症集束化治疗依从性与死亡率的关联:一项队列研究

The association of sepsis bundle compliance with mortality in patients with ICU-acquired sepsis: a cohort study.

作者信息

Green Adam, Patel Sharad, Crabtree Pamela, Patel Divyesha, Hoke Andrew, Orozco Ricardo Jaime, Sangah George, Mercado Alvin, Melchiorre Nicole, Charron Mariane, Chandel Abhimanyu, Puri Nitin

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cooper University Health Care and Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, 1 Cooper Plaza D429, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.

Department of Quality Improvement, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ, USA.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2025 May 20;25(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11134-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of the SEP-1 Bundle has been questioned in the treatment of patients with hospital-acquired sepsis. We aimed to investigate bundle compliance and its association with survival in a subset of patients with HA sepsis: those with ICU-acquired sepsis.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary care referral hospital. Adult patients diagnosed with ICU-acquired sepsis between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2022 were identified. Survival to hospital discharge adjusted for disease severity based on 3-hour, 6-hour, and total bundle compliance was calculated. Secondary outcomes included the need for mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, initiation of acute hemodialysis, and discharge location.

RESULTS

Of 191 patients with ICU-acquired sepsis, 61 patients (31.9%) demonstrated total bundle compliance. There was no difference in survival based on the unadjusted analysis of 3-hour bundle compliance, compliant versus non-compliant (78.9% vs. 67.0%; P = 0.100). However, there was a survival benefit in 6-hour and total bundle, compliance versus non-compliance (82.2% vs. 60.0%, P < 0.001; 86.9% vs. 64.6%, P = 0.002). When adjusted for SOFA and CCI, logistic regression demonstrated similar results: 3-hour compliance (OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.29-1.18, P = 0.150), 6-hour compliance (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.17-0.68, P = 0.002) and total compliance (OR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.13-0.69, P = 0.006). Components of the SEP-1 Bundle that showed a mortality benefit included the collection of "blood cultures prior to antibiotic administration" (OR: 0.46; 95% CI 0.22-0.96, P = 0.037) and "tissue perfusion assessment" (OR: 0.41; 95% CI 0.18-0.90, P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Six-hour and total SEP-1 bundle compliance was associated with increased hospital survival in patients with ICU-acquired sepsis. These findings suggest the importance of sepsis bundle compliance in the ICU environment.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not Applicable.

摘要

背景

SEP-1集束化治疗方案在医院获得性脓毒症患者治疗中的疗效受到质疑。我们旨在调查一组医院获得性脓毒症患者(即重症监护病房获得性脓毒症患者)的集束化治疗方案依从性及其与生存率的关联。

方法

在一家三级医疗转诊医院进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究。确定了2019年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间诊断为重症监护病房获得性脓毒症的成年患者。根据3小时、6小时和总集束化治疗方案依从性,计算调整疾病严重程度后的出院生存率。次要结局包括机械通气需求、血管升压药使用、急性血液透析启动及出院地点。

结果

在191例重症监护病房获得性脓毒症患者中,61例(31.9%)完全依从集束化治疗方案。基于3小时集束化治疗方案依从性的未调整分析,依从组与非依从组的生存率无差异(78.9%对67.0%;P = 0.100)。然而,6小时和总集束化治疗方案依从组与非依从组在生存率上有获益(82.2%对60.0%,P < 0.001;86.9%对64.6%,P = 0.002)。在调整序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和Charlson合并症指数(CCI)后,逻辑回归显示了类似结果:3小时依从性(比值比:0.60;95%置信区间:0.29 - 1.18,P = 0.150),6小时依从性(比值比:0.35;95%置信区间:0.17 - 0.68,P = 0.002)和总依从性(比值比:0.31;95%置信区间:0.13 - 0.69,P = 0.006)。显示有死亡率获益的SEP-1集束化治疗方案组成部分包括“抗生素给药前采集血培养”(比值比:0.46;95%置信区间0.22 - 0.96,P = 0.037)和“组织灌注评估”(比值比:0.41;95%置信区间0.18 - 0.90,P = 0.028)。

结论

6小时和总SEP-1集束化治疗方案依从性与重症监护病房获得性脓毒症患者的住院生存率增加相关。这些发现表明了在重症监护病房环境中脓毒症集束化治疗方案依从性的重要性。

临床试验编号

不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f67/12093641/74f73bab3eec/12879_2025_11134_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

3
Complex Sepsis Presentations, SEP-1 Compliance, and Outcomes.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e251100. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1100.
5
Hour-1 bundle adherence was associated with reduction of in-hospital mortality among patients with sepsis in Japan.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 14;17(2):e0263936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263936. eCollection 2022.
8
Sepsis Bundle Adherence Is Associated with Improved Survival in Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock.
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Sep;19(5):774-781. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.7.37651. Epub 2018 Aug 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic Challenges in Sepsis.
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2021;23(12):22. doi: 10.1007/s11908-021-00765-y. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
3
Epidemiology and burden of sepsis acquired in hospitals and intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;46(8):1536-1551. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06106-2. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
6
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with community-acquired and hospital-acquired sepsis.
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2019 Jan-Mar;31(1):71-78. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20190013.
9
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Priorities for Sepsis and Septic Shock.
Crit Care Med. 2018 Aug;46(8):1334-1356. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003225.
10
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 update.
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jun;44(6):925-928. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5085-0. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验