Suppr超能文献

特发性室性心动过速的诊断、药物治疗及消融方法:2024年欧洲心律协会调查

Diagnostic, pharmacological, and ablation approaches for idiopathic ventricular fibrillation: the 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association survey.

作者信息

Conte Giulio, Metzner Andreas, Anic Ante, Perrotta Laura, Penela Diego, Chun Julian

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, via Tesserete 48, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.

Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, USI, via la Santa, 6962 Lugano, Switzerland.

出版信息

Europace. 2025 May 7;27(5). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf049.

Abstract

AIMS

The aim of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) physician-based survey was to assess current clinical practice regarding the diagnostic assessment and therapeutic management of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) across European Society of Cardiology (ESC) countries and to evaluate adherence to the 2022 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An online 24-item was developed and disseminated by the Scientific Initatives Committee of EHRA. A total of 206 physicians from 41 countries completed the questionnaire. Respondents declaring a full diagnostic assessment of IVF, including at least coronary angiogram/cardiac computed tomography scan, electrocardiogram monitoring, exercise stress test, pharmacological challenges, and cardiac magnetic resonance, were 71 (35%). Cardiac magnetic resonance, sodium channel blocker test, and genetic testing were reported by 51, 34, and 43%, respectively. The most preferred first-line therapeutic strategy in case of recurrent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks was drug therapy (88%). In case of first-line strategy failure, the preferred reported strategy was ablation (53%).

CONCLUSION

This survey highlights a significant heterogeneity of the diagnostic approach to IVF with underuse of crucial examinations. In line with guideline recommendation, drug therapy is more often considered as first-line therapy and ablation as second-line therapy for recurrent ICD shocks. However, quinidine is considered as drug of choice by <25% of respondents.

摘要

目的

欧洲心律协会(EHRA)基于医生的调查旨在评估欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)各成员国在特发性室性心动过速(IVF)诊断评估和治疗管理方面的当前临床实践,并评估对2022年ESC室性心律失常患者管理和心脏性猝死预防指南的遵循情况。

方法与结果

EHRA科学倡议委员会制定并分发了一份包含24个条目的在线调查问卷。来自41个国家的206名医生完成了问卷。71名(35%)受访者表示对IVF进行了全面诊断评估,包括至少冠状动脉造影/心脏计算机断层扫描、心电图监测、运动负荷试验、药物激发试验和心脏磁共振成像。分别有51%、34%和43%的受访者报告进行了心脏磁共振成像、钠通道阻滞剂试验和基因检测。对于植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)反复电击的情况,最常用的一线治疗策略是药物治疗(88%)。如果一线策略失败,首选的报告策略是消融(53%)。

结论

本次调查突出了IVF诊断方法的显著异质性,关键检查使用不足。与指南建议一致,对于ICD反复电击,药物治疗更常被视为一线治疗,消融作为二线治疗。然而,不到25%的受访者将奎尼丁视为首选药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc7/12092335/356ce4a84b6c/euaf049_ga.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验