Birch Jonathon V, Kelly Luke A, Farris Dominic J
Public Health & Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK.
Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2025 May;35(5):e70067. doi: 10.1111/sms.70067.
Typically, humans tune their lower limb mechanics to preserve center of mass motion when hopping or running on surfaces with different stiffnesses. However, much of our understanding of this interaction is based on frequency-constrained hopping and not preferred behavior, which may also be influenced by the stiffness of the surface underfoot. Therefore, we tested if preferred hopping frequency was different from a previously assumed value of 2.2 Hz and if preference was affected by a less-stiff surface. To help explain any observed trends, we quantified foot and ankle mechanics and muscle activations for frequencies ±20% of preferred. We used custom-built platforms to provide both an elastic and locked (inelastic) surface and asked participants to hop bilaterally in place on each. We measured multi-segment foot and ankle kinematics and ground reaction forces, alongside electromyography (EMG) of flexor digitorum brevis, abductor hallucis, soleus, and tibialis anterior. There was no significant difference between mean preferred hopping frequency and 2.2 Hz, for either surface. There was also no difference in mechanics between preferred frequency and 2.2 Hz conditions. However, there were effects of surface, frequency, and surface-by-frequency interactions on foot and ankle kinematics, kinetics, and EMG. Frequency preference appears to be partially driven by an effort to maximize energy stored and returned in the surface while trading off the costs of active muscular work and the cost associated with producing force. Frequency affects hopping mechanics differently on stiff vs. elastic surfaces.
通常情况下,人类在不同刚度的表面上跳跃或奔跑时会调整下肢力学以保持质心运动。然而,我们对这种相互作用的理解大多基于频率受限的跳跃,而非偏好行为,而偏好行为也可能受到脚下表面刚度的影响。因此,我们测试了偏好的跳跃频率是否不同于先前假设的2.2赫兹值,以及偏好是否受到较软表面的影响。为了帮助解释任何观察到的趋势,我们对偏好频率±20%的频率下的足部和踝关节力学以及肌肉激活进行了量化。我们使用定制平台提供弹性和锁定(非弹性)表面,并要求参与者在每个表面上进行双侧原地跳跃。我们测量了多节段足部和踝关节的运动学和地面反作用力,以及趾短屈肌、拇展肌、比目鱼肌和胫骨前肌的肌电图(EMG)。对于任何一种表面,平均偏好跳跃频率与2.2赫兹之间均无显著差异。偏好频率和2.2赫兹条件下的力学也没有差异。然而,表面、频率以及表面与频率的相互作用对足部和踝关节的运动学、动力学和肌电图有影响。频率偏好似乎部分是由在权衡主动肌肉工作成本和产生力相关成本的同时,努力最大化表面存储和返回的能量所驱动的。频率对刚性表面和弹性表面上的跳跃力学影响不同。