Suppr超能文献

德国医疗环境下非瓣膜性心房颤动患者从阿哌沙班转换为利伐沙班治疗的成本效益和预算影响分析

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of switching from apixaban to rivaroxaban treatment among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in a German healthcare setting.

作者信息

Subash Rupesh, Strakosch Thomas, Zhang Michelle, Hagan Melissa, Dworatzek Elke, Kisser Agnes, Vasilopoulos Vasileios, Salter Chloe, Dickerson Carissa, Stawowczyk Ewa

机构信息

Pfizer Ltd, Walton Oaks, Surrey, UK.

FIECON, London, UK.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2025 Jun;14(6):e250008. doi: 10.57264/cer-2025-0008. Epub 2025 May 21.

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) switching often occurs in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) for medical and nonmedical reasons. Limited data describe the economic consequences of DOAC switching in patients with NVAF. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of initiating apixaban and switching to rivaroxaban versus initiating and continuing apixaban for patients with NVAF, from a German payer perspective. Built on an existing model, a cohort-level lifetime Markov model was developed, including dynamic pricing assumptions to account for anticipated generic entry of DOACs. The modeled population (n = 1000) included German patients with NVAF, eligible for oral anticoagulation, who initiated on apixaban. The primary model outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, assessed using cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and a willingness-to-pay threshold of €48,750/QALY. A secondary model outcome was a 5-year budget impact analysis. Switching patients from apixaban to rivaroxaban led to 285 additional events per 1000 patient years, resulting in 0.079 fewer QALYs and higher total costs per patient (€21,357 vs €16,390 for apixaban continuers). In the base case analysis (with generic pricing assumptions), switching from apixaban to rivaroxaban was dominated (i.e., less effective and more costly) by continuing apixaban. In the budget impact analysis (with generic pricing assumptions), switching from apixaban to rivaroxaban led to additional cumulative costs of €490 per patient over 5 years. Despite the introduction of generic discounting, switching patients with NVAF from apixaban to rivaroxaban led to higher total costs and fewer QALYs under base case assumptions, meaning apixaban switchers were dominated by apixaban continuers from a German payer perspective. Switching patients from apixaban to rivaroxaban also led to greater budget impact over 5 years.

摘要

由于医学和非医学原因,非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者经常会更换直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)。关于NVAF患者更换DOAC的经济后果的数据有限。本研究从德国医保支付方的角度,评估了在NVAF患者中起始阿哌沙班并换用利伐沙班与起始并持续使用阿哌沙班相比的成本效益和预算影响。基于现有模型,开发了一个队列水平的终生马尔可夫模型,纳入动态定价假设以考虑DOAC预期的仿制药进入情况。模拟人群(n = 1000)包括符合口服抗凝治疗条件、起始使用阿哌沙班的德国NVAF患者。主要模型结果为增量成本效益比,采用每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本以及48,750欧元/QALY的支付意愿阈值进行评估。次要模型结果为5年预算影响分析。将患者从阿哌沙班换为利伐沙班导致每1000患者年额外发生285起事件,使得每位患者的QALY减少0.079个,总成本更高(阿哌沙班持续使用者为16,390欧元,换用利伐沙班者为21,357欧元)。在基础病例分析(采用仿制药定价假设)中,从阿哌沙班换用利伐沙班被持续使用阿哌沙班所主导(即效果更差且成本更高)。在预算影响分析(采用仿制药定价假设)中,从阿哌沙班换用利伐沙班导致每位患者在5年内的累计成本额外增加490欧元。尽管引入了仿制药折扣,但在基础病例假设下,将NVAF患者从阿哌沙班换为利伐沙班导致总成本更高且QALY更少,这意味着从德国医保支付方的角度来看,换用阿哌沙班的患者被持续使用阿哌沙班的患者所主导。将患者从阿哌沙班换为利伐沙班在5年内也导致了更大的预算影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验