Si Nafa Si Ahmed, Benali Souad, Penaranda Guillaume, Deuffic-Burban Sylvie, Madau Magali, Lecomte Laurence, Valle Gaelle, Thibault Sandrine, Chailloux Constance, Oules Valérie, Dassetto Clara, Sellier Floriane, Pietri Olivia, Castellani Paul, Adhoute Xavier, Bourlière Marc
Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Hospital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France.
Laboratoire Alphabio - Biogroup, Marseille, France.
J Viral Hepat. 2025 Jun;32(6):e70038. doi: 10.1111/jvh.70038.
In France, chronic hepatitis C whatever fibrosis stage or comorbidities can be freely treated by any physician. However, screening is still currently based on risk factors, and universal screening remains controversial. The aims of this prospective DEVICHO study were to assess the value of universal screening in hospitalised patients, to evaluate the prevalence of HCV infection and to compare the short-term cost and benefit of this strategy with routine screening. From November 2019 to November 2021, all hospitalised patients from 22 departments were asked by their physicians to be tested for HCV. 4986/25,663 (19.4%) in the DEVICHO study (Group 1) and 1803 patients (7%) outside the study (Group 2) were screened. HCV screening rate varied widely (0%-75.1%) between departments. One hundred and ninety-nine patients (2.9%) were HCV-Ab positive. 29/199 HCV-Ab positive patients (14.6%) or 29/6789 patients tested (0.4%) were HCV-RNA positive. Among the 29 viremic patients, 9 (31%) were treated, all achieving sustained virological response, but two patients died rapidly after treatment. Seventeen patients died untreated within a year of diagnosis, and three patients were not treated. Universal screening compared to routine practice would be more expensive and more effective, resulting in an additional cost of €11,060 per HCV RNA infection identified and €36,600 per HCV cure, both below the GDP per capita of France (€38,000, Eurostat 2023). Even if the population screened is older, often with significant comorbidities, hospital-based HCV screening is efficient because its prevalence is higher in hospitalised patients than in the general population. Additionally, this screening strategy appears to be cost effective. However, healthcare professionals and insufficient linkage to care are the main barriers to screening. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NTC 04437277.
在法国,无论纤维化阶段或合并症如何,任何医生均可免费治疗慢性丙型肝炎。然而,目前筛查仍基于风险因素,普遍筛查仍存在争议。这项前瞻性DEVICHO研究的目的是评估住院患者普遍筛查的价值,评估丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的患病率,并将该策略与常规筛查的短期成本和效益进行比较。2019年11月至2021年11月,22个科室的所有住院患者被其医生要求进行HCV检测。DEVICHO研究(第1组)中有4986/25663例(19.4%)患者以及研究外的1803例患者(7%)(第2组)接受了筛查。各科室的HCV筛查率差异很大(0%-75.1%)。199例患者(2.9%)HCV抗体呈阳性。29/199例HCV抗体阳性患者(14.6%)或29/6789例检测患者(0.4%)HCV核糖核酸(RNA)呈阳性。在这29例病毒血症患者中,9例(31%)接受了治疗,均实现了持续病毒学应答,但有2例患者在治疗后很快死亡。17例患者在诊断后一年内未经治疗死亡,3例患者未接受治疗。与常规做法相比,普遍筛查成本更高但更有效,每确诊一例HCV RNA感染额外成本为11,060欧元,每治愈一例HCV额外成本为36,600欧元,均低于法国人均国内生产总值(38,000欧元,欧盟统计局2023年数据)。即使筛查人群年龄较大,通常合并症严重,但基于医院的HCV筛查仍然有效,因为住院患者中的患病率高于普通人群。此外,这种筛查策略似乎具有成本效益。然而,医疗保健专业人员以及与护理的联系不足是筛查的主要障碍。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NTC 04437277