Pardiñas Maria Luisa, Rivera-Egea Rocío, Maria de Los Santos Jose, Vidal Carmen, Giles Juan, Ortega-Jaen David, Gil Julia, Martin Angel, Viloria Thamara, Jose de Los Santos Maria
IVI Foundation, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain.
IVF and Andrology Laboratory, IVIRMA Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
F S Sci. 2025 May 19. doi: 10.1016/j.xfss.2025.05.002.
To determine the impact of a microfluidic-based sperm selection device on sperm parameters and embryo variables compared with the conventional swim-up method in sibling oocytes.
Prospective observational study.
A total of 345 oocytes were recruited from 27 couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection, including both own (n = 195) and donation (n = 150) cycles. None of the patients presented severe male factor.
INTERVENTION/EXPOSURE: Semen sample was divided into 2 groups and processed using swim-up or the microfluidic sperm selection device (MSSD) ZyMōt. Half of the oocytes were inseminated with swim-up-selected spermatozoa, and the rest were inseminated with MSSD-selected spermatozoa. Embryo development was followed by time-lapse. Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fragmentation was measured using the sperm chromatin dispersion test, analyzed with ImageJ. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed for statistical analysis.
Sperm DNA fragmentation levels, sperm parameters, fertilization rates, embryo morphokinetics, and rate of usable blastocysts.
Sperm DNA fragmentation was significantly lower in the MSSD group than in the swim-up group (20.3% vs. 11%), indicating a better selection. Analyzing separately the oocytes from the patient's own cycles, MSSD showed a significantly higher rate of usable blastocysts per fertilized oocyte. However, this difference was not observed using donated oocytes or when both cycles were combined. Embryos from the swim-up group showed a significant delay in time of pronuclear appearance and morula formation compared with those from the MSSD group, being more marked in donated oocytes. No significant differences were observed in the fertilization rate and the remaining morphokinetic times.
This study provides valuable information on the use of MSSD for noninvasive sperm selection. When MSSD was used, we observed a reduction in sperm DNA fragmentation and an enhancement in the number of usable embryos in our own cycles. These findings could be compatible with a reduced capacity to repair sperm damage due to poorer oocyte quality caused by advanced age.
与传统的上游法相比,确定基于微流控的精子筛选装置对同胞卵母细胞精子参数和胚胎变量的影响。
前瞻性观察研究。
从27对接受卵胞浆内单精子注射的夫妇中招募了总共345个卵母细胞,包括自身(n = 195)和捐赠(n = 150)周期。所有患者均无严重男性因素。
干预/暴露:精液样本分为2组,分别采用上游法或微流控精子筛选装置(MSSD)ZyMōt进行处理。一半的卵母细胞用上游法筛选的精子进行授精,其余的用MSSD筛选的精子进行授精。通过延时观察胚胎发育情况。使用精子染色质扩散试验测量精子脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)片段化,并通过ImageJ进行分析。采用Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析。
精子DNA片段化水平、精子参数、受精率、胚胎形态动力学和可用囊胚率。
MSSD组的精子DNA片段化明显低于上游法组(20.3%对11%),表明筛选效果更好。单独分析患者自身周期的卵母细胞时,MSSD显示每个受精卵母细胞的可用囊胚率显著更高。然而,使用捐赠卵母细胞或合并两个周期时未观察到这种差异。与MSSD组相比,上游法组的胚胎原核出现时间和桑椹胚形成时间明显延迟,在捐赠卵母细胞中更为明显。受精率和其余形态动力学时间未观察到显著差异。
本研究为使用MSSD进行无创精子筛选提供了有价值的信息。使用MSSD时,我们观察到自身周期中精子DNA片段化减少,可用胚胎数量增加。这些发现可能与由于高龄导致卵母细胞质量较差而修复精子损伤的能力降低有关。