• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺炎患者使用头孢曲松与胆道感染之间的关联:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。

Association Between Ceftriaxone Use and Biliary Infections in Patients With Pneumonia: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Taniguchi Jumpei, Aso Shotaro, Matsui Hiroki, Fushimi Kiyohide, Yasunaga Hideo

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Health Services Research, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Jun;34(6):e70162. doi: 10.1002/pds.70162.

DOI:10.1002/pds.70162
PMID:40398875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12094858/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ceftriaxone is believed to increase the risk of biliary infections due to pseudolithiasis caused by ceftriaxone-calcium precipitation, but this risk is not well understood. This study aimed to investigate whether ceftriaxone use is associated with an increased risk of biliary infections in pneumonia patients using a national inpatient database.

METHODS

We analyzed the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan, identifying pneumonia patients between July 2010 and March 2022. Patients were grouped by treatment: ceftriaxone versus ampicillin-sulbactam or cefotaxime. Propensity score overlap-weighting was used to adjust for confounding factors. The primary outcome was a composite measure, including cholecystitis or cholangitis during hospitalization, and any percutaneous, endoscopic, or surgical interventions on the biliary tract. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 1 503 885 eligible patients, 558 725 received ceftriaxone, while 945 160 were treated with either ampicillin-sulbactam or cefotaxime. The mean dose of ceftriaxone was 1.7 g/day (standard deviation, 0.7 g/day), with a mean administration duration of 7.1 days (standard deviation, 3.8 days). Propensity score overlap-weighting analysis revealed that ceftriaxone treatment was associated with an increased incidence of the composite outcome (0.22% vs. 0.18%; risk difference, 0.05%; 95% confidence interval, 0.03%-0.07%; p < 0.001), as well as the secondary outcomes, including cholecystitis or cholangitis during hospitalization and percutaneous or endoscopic drainage of the gallbladder or biliary tract.

CONCLUSION

Ceftriaxone use was associated with a slight increase in the risk of biliary infections.

摘要

背景

头孢曲松被认为会因头孢曲松 - 钙沉淀导致的假结石而增加胆道感染风险,但这种风险尚未得到充分了解。本研究旨在利用全国住院患者数据库调查肺炎患者使用头孢曲松是否会增加胆道感染风险。

方法

我们分析了日本的诊断程序组合数据库,确定了2010年7月至2022年3月期间的肺炎患者。患者按治疗方式分组:头孢曲松组与氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦组或头孢噻肟组。采用倾向得分重叠加权法调整混杂因素。主要结局是一项综合指标,包括住院期间的胆囊炎或胆管炎,以及对胆道的任何经皮、内镜或手术干预。次要结局包括主要结局的各个组成部分。

结果

在1503885例符合条件的患者中,558725例接受了头孢曲松治疗,而945160例接受了氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦或头孢噻肟治疗。头孢曲松的平均剂量为1.7克/天(标准差,0.7克/天),平均给药持续时间为7.1天(标准差,3.8天)。倾向得分重叠加权分析显示,头孢曲松治疗与综合结局的发生率增加相关(0.22%对0.18%;风险差异,0.05%;95%置信区间,0.03% - 0.07%;p < 0.001),以及与次要结局相关,包括住院期间的胆囊炎或胆管炎以及胆囊或胆道的经皮或内镜引流。

结论

使用头孢曲松与胆道感染风险略有增加相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9de/12094858/f7cad1f0e3f6/PDS-34-e70162-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9de/12094858/f7cad1f0e3f6/PDS-34-e70162-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9de/12094858/f7cad1f0e3f6/PDS-34-e70162-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Association Between Ceftriaxone Use and Biliary Infections in Patients With Pneumonia: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.肺炎患者使用头孢曲松与胆道感染之间的关联:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Jun;34(6):e70162. doi: 10.1002/pds.70162.
2
Epidemiology of biliary tract-associated bloodstream infections and adequacy of empiric therapy: an Australian population-based study.胆道相关血流感染的流行病学和经验性治疗的充分性:一项基于澳大利亚人群的研究。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Sep;43(9):1753-1760. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04894-9. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
3
Comparative evaluation of ceftriaxone- and cefotaxime-induced biliary pseudolithiasis or nephrolithiasis: A prospective study in 154 children.头孢曲松和头孢噻肟所致胆汁假性结石或肾结石的比较评估:一项针对154名儿童的前瞻性研究。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2017 Jun;36(6):547-553. doi: 10.1177/0960327116658108. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
4
Fasting and bed rest, even for a relatively short period, are risk factors for ceftriaxone-associated pseudolitiasis.禁食和卧床休息,即使是相对较短的时间,都是与头孢曲松相关的假性结石形成的危险因素。
Pediatr Int. 2015 Oct;57(5):942-6. doi: 10.1111/ped.12625. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
5
Sonographic assessment of ceftriaxone-associated biliary pseudolithiasis in Chinese children.中国儿童头孢曲松相关胆汁假性结石的超声评估
J Int Med Res. 2010;38(6):2004-10. doi: 10.1177/147323001003800614.
6
1g versus 2 g daily intravenous ceftriaxone in the treatment of community onset pneumonia - a propensity score analysis of data from a Japanese multicenter registry.1g 与 2g 日剂量静脉注射头孢曲松治疗社区获得性肺炎 - 来自日本多中心注册登记研究的倾向评分分析数据。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Dec 26;19(1):1079. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4552-8.
7
Ceftriaxone-associated Biliary Pseudolithiasis with Elderly Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Two Case Reports.头孢曲松相关胆内假性结石伴老年 1 型糖尿病:两例报告。
Intern Med. 2023 Nov 15;62(22):3367-3371. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1405-22. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
8
Effectiveness of Ampicillin-Sulbactam Versus Ceftriaxone for the Initial Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Older Adults: A Target Trial Emulation Study.氨苄西林-舒巴坦与头孢曲松用于老年人社区获得性肺炎初始治疗的有效性:一项目标试验模拟研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 5;12(3):ofaf133. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf133. eCollection 2025 Mar.
9
Concomitant use of lansoprazole and ceftriaxone is associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac arrest in a large Japanese hospital database.在一个大型日本医院数据库中,兰索拉唑和头孢曲松的联合使用与室性心律失常和心脏骤停风险增加相关。
J Infect. 2024 Aug;89(2):106202. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106202. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
10
Ultrasonographic findings in ceftriaxone: associated biliary sludge and pseudolithiasis in children.头孢曲松的超声检查结果:儿童中相关的胆泥和假结石形成
Acta Radiol. 2005 Feb;46(1):112-6. doi: 10.1080/02841850510015983.

本文引用的文献

1
Updated information on the Diagnosis Procedure Combination data.诊断程序组合数据的更新信息。
Ann Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 4;6(4):106-110. doi: 10.37737/ace.24015. eCollection 2024 Oct 1.
2
Risk Factors for Ceftriaxone-Associated Pseudolithiasis in Adults.成人头孢曲松相关假性结石的危险因素。
Digestion. 2023;104(4):313-319. doi: 10.1159/000529522. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
3
Development and Validation of a Novel Method for Converting the Japan Coma Scale to Glasgow Coma Scale.开发并验证一种将日本昏迷量表转换为格拉斯哥昏迷量表的新方法。
J Epidemiol. 2023 Oct 5;33(10):531-535. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20220147. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
4
Acute necrotizing calculous cholecystitis after treatment with ceftriaxone in an elderly patient: a case report.老年患者头孢曲松治疗后发生急性坏死性结石性胆囊炎:一例报告
Surg Case Rep. 2022 May 18;8(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s40792-022-01450-5.
5
Ceftriaxone-induced Acute Cholecystitis.头孢曲松所致急性胆囊炎
J Med Ultrasound. 2021 May 14;29(4):288-290. doi: 10.4103/JMU.JMU_132_20. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
6
Ceftriaxone-associated Pseudolithiasis in Elderly People: Frequency and Risk Factors.头孢曲松相关性老年人假性结石:频率和危险因素。
Intern Med. 2021;60(24):3857-3864. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.7611-21. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
7
Overlap Weighting: A Propensity Score Method That Mimics Attributes of a Randomized Clinical Trial.重叠加权法:一种模拟随机临床试验属性的倾向评分方法。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2417-2418. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7819.
8
Safety of ceftriaxone in paediatrics: a systematic review.头孢曲松在儿科中的安全性:系统评价。
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Oct;105(10):981-985. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317950. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
9
Computed tomography findings of ceftriaxone-associated biliary pseudocholelithiasis in adults.成人头孢曲松相关胆道假性胆石症的计算机断层扫描表现。
Jpn J Radiol. 2019 Dec;37(12):826-831. doi: 10.1007/s11604-019-00893-5. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
10
Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners.使用基于倾向评分的加权法在观察性研究中进行混杂因素调整的替代方法:从业者入门指南
BMJ. 2019 Oct 23;367:l5657. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5657.