Totschnig David, Mader Theresa, Stimpfl Thomas, Breinbauer Klaus, Groza Cristina, Stücklschwaiger David, Neuhold Stephanie, Friese Emanuela, Holbik Johannes, Delivuk Martina, Ripplinger Tom, Leber Marcell, Ott Clemens, Hoepler Wolfgang, Perez Ruiz de Garibay Aritz, Wenisch Christoph, Frey Otto, Zoufaly Alexander, Traugott Marianna
Department of Medicine IV, Klinik Favoriten, Vienna Healthcare Group, Kundratstraße 3, 1100, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Infection. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02554-4.
Optimal dosing of antibiotics in critically ill patients treated with the novel multi organ replacement therapy ADVOS (ADVanced Organ Support) based on albumin dialysis is unclear. This study aims to provide real life data on meropenem plasma concentrations after prolonged infusion in patients treated with ADVOS and a critically ill control group with and without continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF).
We retrospectively analyzed plasma concentrations of meropenem obtained as part of our standard of care therapeutic drug monitoring in the intensive care unit. Meropenem was administered as a prolonged infusion over 3 h. We measured peak and trough levels, pre-and post-filter levels of meropenem using high performance liquid chromatography. We calculated the meropenem clearance and compared the measured clearance with predicted clearance based on creatinine, calculated by the MeroEasy tool.
In total, 159 measurements across 16 patients were analyzed. Meropenem trough concentrations were highest in the CVVHDF group with a median of 23.5 mg/L, followed by the ADVOS (median 9.3 mg/L) and control group (median 7.6 mg/L). No trough levels were below the lower limit of 2 mg/L in the CVVHDF and ADVOS groups. Meropenem machine clearance by CVVHDF was calculated to be 1.8 (± 0.5) L/h and 3.5 (± 1) L/h for ADVOS.
Our results suggest that ADVOS treatment in critically ill patients receiving a high dose meropenem regimen (2 g IV q8h) does not lead to underdosing. Some trough values were even within potentially toxic levels, especially in the CVVHDF group, highlighting the importance of therapeutic drug monitoring.
对于采用基于白蛋白透析的新型多器官替代疗法ADVOS(高级器官支持)治疗的重症患者,抗生素的最佳剂量尚不清楚。本研究旨在提供接受ADVOS治疗的患者以及有或无连续性静脉-静脉血液透析滤过(CVVHDF)的重症对照组患者长时间输注美罗培南后美罗培南血浆浓度的实际数据。
我们回顾性分析了作为重症监护病房标准治疗药物监测一部分获得的美罗培南血浆浓度。美罗培南采用3小时的长时间输注给药。我们使用高效液相色谱法测量美罗培南的峰浓度和谷浓度、滤器前后的浓度。我们计算了美罗培南清除率,并将测量的清除率与基于肌酐由MeroEasy工具计算的预测清除率进行比较。
总共分析了16例患者的159次测量结果。CVVHDF组中美罗培南谷浓度最高,中位数为23.5mg/L,其次是ADVOS组(中位数9.3mg/L)和对照组(中位数7.6mg/L)。CVVHDF组和ADVOS组中没有谷浓度低于2mg/L的下限。CVVHDF对美罗培南的机器清除率计算为1.8(±0.5)L/h,ADVOS为3.5(±1)L/h。
我们的结果表明,接受高剂量美罗培南方案(2g静脉注射,每8小时一次)的重症患者接受ADVOS治疗不会导致剂量不足。一些谷值甚至处于潜在毒性水平,尤其是在CVVHDF组,这突出了治疗药物监测的重要性。