• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲泼尼龙和甲氧氯普胺在控制接受顺铂治疗患者呕吐中的应用。

The use of methylprednisolone and metoclopramide in control of emesis in patients receiving cis-platinum.

作者信息

Benrubi G I, Norvell M, Nuss R C, Robinson H

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 1985 Jul;21(3):306-13. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(85)90268-9.

DOI:10.1016/0090-8258(85)90268-9
PMID:4040050
Abstract

cis-Platinum is a chemotherapeutic agent with benefits often limited by the severe gastrointestinal reactions it produces in nearly all patients. Persistent anorexia, nausea, and vomiting may continue for days after therapy and are poorly controlled by conventional antiemetics. Patients at times refuse continuation of cis-platinum chemotherapy because of these severe gastrointestinal side effects. Intravenous methylprednisolone (Solu-medrol) as well as intravenous metoclopramide (Reglan) have been shown effective in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. This randomized, double-blind study is a comparison of the efficacy of Solu-medrol vs Reglan, as well as, the combination of Solu-medrol and Reglan in the prevention of cis-platinum-induced nausea and vomiting. In this study patients receiving Reglan had better protection from vomiting than patients receiving Solu-medrol (P = 0.0564). Patients receiving the combination of Reglan and Solu-medrol had better protection from vomiting than patients receiving Reglan alone (P = 0.0332), or patients receiving Solu-medrol alone (P = 0.0010). Finally, older patients experienced less vomiting than younger patients, regardless of the anti-emetic drugs used (P = 0.0730).

摘要

顺铂是一种化疗药物,其益处往往受到几乎所有患者都会出现的严重胃肠道反应的限制。持续性厌食、恶心和呕吐在治疗后可能会持续数天,且常规止吐药对其控制效果不佳。患者有时会因这些严重的胃肠道副作用而拒绝继续接受顺铂化疗。静脉注射甲泼尼龙(甲强龙)以及静脉注射甲氧氯普胺(胃复安)已被证明对治疗化疗引起的恶心和呕吐有效。这项随机双盲研究比较了甲强龙与胃复安以及甲强龙和胃复安联合使用在预防顺铂引起的恶心和呕吐方面的疗效。在这项研究中,接受胃复安的患者比接受甲强龙的患者对呕吐有更好的防护作用(P = 0.0564)。接受胃复安和甲强龙联合治疗的患者比单独接受胃复安治疗的患者(P = 0.0332)或单独接受甲强龙治疗的患者(P = 0.0010)对呕吐有更好的防护作用。最后,无论使用何种止吐药物,老年患者的呕吐情况都比年轻患者少(P = 0.0730)。

相似文献

1
The use of methylprednisolone and metoclopramide in control of emesis in patients receiving cis-platinum.甲泼尼龙和甲氧氯普胺在控制接受顺铂治疗患者呕吐中的应用。
Gynecol Oncol. 1985 Jul;21(3):306-13. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(85)90268-9.
2
A single-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron, a selective serotonin antagonist, with intravenous metoclopramide in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy.静脉注射选择性5-羟色胺拮抗剂昂丹司琼与静脉注射胃复安预防大剂量顺铂化疗相关恶心和呕吐的单盲比较。
J Clin Oncol. 1991 May;9(5):721-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.5.721.
3
Oral granisetron with or without methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide plus methylprednisolone in the management of delayed nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A prospective randomized trial.口服格拉司琼联合或不联合甲泼尼龙与甲氧氯普胺联合甲泼尼龙治疗顺铂类化疗引起的延迟性恶心和呕吐的疗效比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Cancer. 1995 Nov 15;76(10):1821-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19951115)76:10<1821::aid-cncr2820761022>3.0.co;2-y.
4
Controlling delayed vomiting: double-blind, randomized trial comparing placebo, dexamethasone alone, and metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in patients receiving cisplatin.
J Clin Oncol. 1989 Jan;7(1):108-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.1.108.
5
Comparison of two different high doses of metoclopramide in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis.两种不同高剂量胃复安预防化疗引起呕吐的比较。
Neth J Med. 1989 Dec;35(5-6):283-94.
6
Antiemetic efficacy of alprazolam in the combination of metoclopramide plus methylprednisolone. Double-blind randomized crossover study in patients with cisplatin-induced emesis.
Am J Clin Oncol. 1993 Aug;16(4):338-41. doi: 10.1097/00000421-199308000-00013.
7
Methylprednisolone versus metoclopramide for prevention of nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients treated with intravenous cyclophosphamide methotrexate 5-fluorouracil: a double-blind randomized study.甲泼尼龙与甲氧氯普胺预防接受静脉注射环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和5-氟尿嘧啶治疗的乳腺癌患者恶心呕吐的疗效比较:一项双盲随机研究
Oncology. 1988;45(5):346-9. doi: 10.1159/000226638.
8
[Randomized crossover trial of the antiemetic effects obtained with metoclopramide and droperidol versus those obtained with metoclopramide, droperidol and methylprednisolone in patients receiving cis-platinum chemotherapy].[在接受顺铂化疗的患者中,甲氧氯普胺与氟哌利多联用、甲氧氯普胺与氟哌利多及甲泼尼龙联用的止吐效果的随机交叉试验]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1986 Aug;13(8):2562-7.
9
The role of metoclopramide in acute and delayed chemotherapy induced emesis: a randomised double blind trial.胃复安在急性和延迟性化疗所致呕吐中的作用:一项随机双盲试验。
Br J Cancer. 1989 Nov;60(5):759-63. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1989.354.
10
Methylprednisolone in cis-platinum induced nausea and emesis: a placebo-controlled trial.甲泼尼龙治疗顺铂引起的恶心和呕吐:一项安慰剂对照试验。
Gynecol Oncol. 1987 May;27(1):84-9. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(87)90233-2.

引用本文的文献

1
[Management of chemotherapy-induced emesis: what is the standard after 20 years of clinical research].[化疗引起的呕吐的管理:经过20年临床研究后何为标准]
Med Klin (Munich). 1998 Jan;93 Suppl 1:3-17. doi: 10.1007/BF03041988.
2
Antiemetics in cancer chemotherapy: historical perspective and current state of the art.癌症化疗中的止吐药:历史回顾与当前技术水平
Support Care Cancer. 1994 May;2(3):150-60. doi: 10.1007/BF00417473.
3
Reducing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Current perspectives and future possibilities.减轻化疗引起的恶心和呕吐。当前观点与未来可能性
Drug Saf. 1993 Dec;9(6):410-28. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199309060-00004.
4
Does dexamethasone enhance control of acute cisplatin induced emesis by ondansetron?地塞米松是否能增强昂丹司琼对顺铂所致急性呕吐的控制作用?
BMJ. 1991 Dec 7;303(6815):1423-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6815.1423.
5
Methylprednisolone as antiemetic treatment in breast-cancer patients receiving cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil: a prospective, crossover, randomized blind study comparing two different dose schedules.甲泼尼龙用于接受环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和5-氟尿嘧啶治疗的乳腺癌患者的止吐治疗:一项比较两种不同剂量方案的前瞻性、交叉、随机双盲研究。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1992;30(3):229-32. doi: 10.1007/BF00686319.