Thai An, Huynh Kimberly, Pickering Trevor, Maron Angela, Wang Lana, Stohl Hindi
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, USA.
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harbor University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, USA.
Cureus. 2025 Apr 21;17(4):e82710. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82710. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Background This research addresses the intricate process through which medical students choose or reject a specialty by investigating the factors that influence their decisions. One such factor is malpractice risk, which is a substantial consideration in specialties with higher risk for malpractice litigation, such as obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn). Our research probes the relationship between medical students' perception of risk for malpractice litigation and specialty preference by exploring the factors that deter medical students from choosing the field of Ob/Gyn and elucidating the factors that impact specialty choice. Methods Conducted as an online survey via email, our research engaged medical students across all four graduating class years (Class of 2022 to 2025) at Western University of Health Sciences Pomona and Western University of Health Sciences of Northwest osteopathic medical schools. There is a ratio of 75 males to every 100 females per graduating class (Class of 2022 to 2025). Rigorous beta testing and multiple revisions preceded the survey. Reminder emails were sent at 1- and 3-week intervals after distribution. We employed Pearson's Chi-square tests and Fisher's exact test to identify factors influencing specialty choice and assess perceived medico-legal risk. Results We obtained responses from 392 medical students across all four classes. The total respondents were 150 males and 242 females. Our analysis revealed that risk for malpractice litigation ranked as the third most prevalent factor dissuading medical students from pursuing Ob/Gyn; however, gender-specific disparities among other factors also played a role. Males cited disinterest, female predominance, and patient population as reasons against choosing Ob/Gyn, while females emphasized lifestyle and competitiveness. The study underscored factors pivotal for those choosing Ob/Gyn, including patient-related aspects and procedural abilities. Conclusions Medical liability did not significantly influence osteopathic medical students already planning to pursue Ob/Gyn, whereas gender emerged as a key factor among those deterred. Male students demonstrated greater awareness of medico-legal practice laws, though both genders reported only limited knowledge. Among those not choosing Ob/Gyn, females cited competitiveness, liability concerns, and lifestyle as significant deterrents. These gender-specific differences highlight disparities in medical education and underscore the need for targeted mentorship and educational initiatives to foster diversity within the specialty. Understanding these factors can help medical schools support students' specialty decisions and develop strategies to cultivate a more balanced workforce.
背景 本研究通过调查影响医学生决策的因素,探讨医学生选择或拒绝某一专业的复杂过程。其中一个因素是医疗事故风险,在医疗事故诉讼风险较高的专业中,如妇产科(Ob/Gyn),这是一个重要的考虑因素。我们的研究通过探究阻碍医学生选择妇产科领域的因素,并阐明影响专业选择的因素,来探讨医学生对医疗事故诉讼风险的认知与专业偏好之间的关系。
方法 通过电子邮件进行在线调查,我们的研究涉及了西健康科学大学波莫纳分校和西北整骨医学院西健康科学大学所有四个毕业年级(2022届至2025届)的医学生。每个毕业年级(2022届至2025届)男女比例为75名男性对100名女性。在调查之前进行了严格的β测试和多次修订。分发后每隔1周和3周发送提醒邮件。我们采用Pearson卡方检验和Fisher精确检验来确定影响专业选择的因素,并评估感知到的医疗法律风险。
结果 我们从所有四个班级的392名医学生中获得了回复。总受访者为150名男性和242名女性。我们的分析表明,医疗事故诉讼风险被列为劝阻医学生攻读妇产科的第三大普遍因素;然而,其他因素中的性别差异也起到了作用。男性将缺乏兴趣、女性占主导地位和患者群体作为不选择妇产科的原因,而女性则强调生活方式和竞争力。该研究强调了对那些选择妇产科的人至关重要的因素,包括与患者相关的方面和程序能力。
结论 医疗责任对已经计划攻读妇产科的整骨医学院学生没有显著影响,而性别成为那些被劝阻者中的一个关键因素。男学生对医疗法律实践法律的认识更强,不过两性都表示知识有限。在不选择妇产科的人中,女性将竞争力、责任担忧和生活方式视为重要的阻碍因素。这些性别差异凸显了医学教育中的差异,并强调需要有针对性的指导和教育举措,以促进该专业的多样性。了解这些因素有助于医学院支持学生的专业决策,并制定策略以培养更加平衡的劳动力队伍。