• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创复位与横杆外固定治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的影像学及临床疗效分析

Imaging and clinical efficacy analysis of minimally invasive reduction and crossbar external fixation in the treatment of Sanders Ⅱ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures.

作者信息

Wang Jianchuan, Guan Tianmin, Xue Qiwen

机构信息

School of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2025 May 7;12:1550024. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1550024. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2025.1550024
PMID:40401282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12092454/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of percutaneous minimally invasive reduction combined with crossbar external fixation in the treatment of Sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 65 patients with Sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures who were treated at Zhongshan Hospital affiliated with Dalian University between February 2019 and June 2021. Among them, 48 were males and 17 were females, with a mean age of 42.3 ± 10.2 years. There were 45 cases of Sanders type II fractures and 20 cases of type III fractures. Patients were divided into three groups based on the surgical methods: Group A ( = 25, minimally invasive reduction with crossbar external fixation), Group B ( = 21, minimally invasive locking plate fixation via the sinus tarsi approach), and Group C ( = 19, locking plate fixation via the lateral L-shaped incision). The following parameters were recorded and compared among the groups: preoperative waiting time, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, and postoperative complications. Imaging parameters assessed included calcaneal length, width, height, Böhler angle, Gissane angle, and varus angle. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Maryland Foot and Ankle Score.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences among the groups ( > 0.05). All patients were followed up for an average duration of 15.6 ± 1.2 months. Group A demonstrated significantly shorter preoperative waiting times, operative durations, lower intraoperative blood loss, and shorter incision lengths compared with groups B and C ( < 0.05). Furthermore, VAS scores 3 days postoperatively were significantly lower in group A compared to groups B and C ( < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed between groups B and C. The incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in groups A and B compared with group C ( < 0.05), with no significant difference observed between groups A and B. In addition, complications observed in the study included pinhole infections, cyanosis of the skin at the edge of the incision, nerve damage, and skin necrosis. Statistically, the complication rate was significantly lower in the group with the percutaneous minimally invasive approach than in the group with the traditional L-shaped approach. Imaging assessments at 2 weeks and 12 months postoperatively revealed no significant differences among the three groups in Böhler angle, Gissane angle, calcaneal varus angle, and calcaneal dimensions ( > 0.05). All imaging parameters significantly improved postoperatively within each group ( < 0.05). At the final follow-up, clinical outcomes (AOFAS, SF-36, Maryland scores) showed no significant differences among groups ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The Percutaneous minimally invasive reduction combined with crossbar external fixation provides effective fixation with minimal trauma, shorter hospital stays, and lower complication rates, representing a viable treatment strategy for Sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a30/12092454/c3d88c0ee2ec/fsurg-12-1550024-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a30/12092454/7fd29ee82d72/fsurg-12-1550024-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a30/12092454/4f4e134cf032/fsurg-12-1550024-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a30/12092454/c3d88c0ee2ec/fsurg-12-1550024-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a30/12092454/7fd29ee82d72/fsurg-12-1550024-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a30/12092454/4f4e134cf032/fsurg-12-1550024-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a30/12092454/c3d88c0ee2ec/fsurg-12-1550024-g001.jpg
摘要

目的

评估经皮微创复位联合横杆外固定治疗SandersⅡ型和Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的临床疗效。

方法

对2019年2月至2021年6月在大连大学附属中山医院接受治疗的65例SandersⅡ型和Ⅲ型跟骨骨折患者进行回顾性分析。其中,男性48例,女性17例,平均年龄42.3±10.2岁。SandersⅡ型骨折45例,Ⅲ型骨折20例。根据手术方法将患者分为三组:A组(n = 25,微创复位联合横杆外固定)、B组(n = 21,经跗骨窦入路微创锁定钢板固定)和C组(n = 19,经外侧L形切口锁定钢板固定)。记录并比较各组的以下参数:术前等待时间、手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度和术后并发症。评估的影像学参数包括跟骨长度、宽度、高度、Böhler角、Gissane角和内翻角。使用美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)踝后足评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、简短健康调查问卷(SF - 36)和马里兰足踝评分评估临床结局。

结果

各组基线特征无显著差异(P>0.05)。所有患者平均随访15.6±1.2个月。与B组和C组相比,A组术前等待时间、手术时间明显更短,术中出血量更少,切口长度更短(P<0.05)。此外,术后3天A组的VAS评分明显低于B组和C组(P<0.05),而B组和C组之间无显著差异。A组和B组术后并发症发生率明显低于C组(P<0.05),A组和B组之间无显著差异。此外,研究中观察到的并发症包括针孔感染、切口边缘皮肤发绀、神经损伤和皮肤坏死。统计学上,经皮微创入路组的并发症发生率明显低于传统L形入路组中的发生率。术后2周和12个月的影像学评估显示,三组在Böhler角、Gissane角、跟骨内翻角和跟骨尺寸方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。每组术后所有影像学参数均有显著改善(P<0.05)。在最终随访时,临床结局(AOFAS、SF - 36、马里兰评分)在各组之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

经皮微创复位联合横杆外固定能以最小的创伤提供有效的固定,缩短住院时间,降低并发症发生率,是治疗SandersⅡ型和Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的一种可行治疗策略。

相似文献

1
Imaging and clinical efficacy analysis of minimally invasive reduction and crossbar external fixation in the treatment of Sanders Ⅱ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures.微创复位与横杆外固定治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的影像学及临床疗效分析
Front Surg. 2025 May 7;12:1550024. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1550024. eCollection 2025.
2
[Effectiveness of minimally invasive plate and medial supporting cannulated screw fixation via tarsal sinus approach for Sanders type Ⅱ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures].[经跗骨窦入路微创钢板联合内侧支撑空心螺钉固定治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Dec 15;36(12):1471-1478. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202205103.
3
Comparison of the Curative Effect of Percutaneous Reduction with Plastic Calcaneal Forceps Combined with Medial External Fixation in the Treatment of Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures.经皮复位塑料跟骨夹联合内侧外固定治疗关节内跟骨骨折的疗效比较。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Dec;13(8):2344-2354. doi: 10.1111/os.13118. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
4
[Clinical study of sinus tarsal approach combined with Herbert screw and minimally invasive calcaneal locking plate in the treatment of SandersⅡ and Ⅲ calcaneal fractures].距下窦入路联合Herbert螺钉与微创跟骨锁定钢板治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的临床研究
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2022 Nov 25;35(11):1026-30. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.11.004.
5
[Minimally invasive tarsal sinus incision combined with manipulative reduction and internal fixation for calcaneal fractures of Sanders typeⅡ and Ⅲ].微创跗骨窦切口联合手法复位及内固定治疗SandersⅡ型和Ⅲ型跟骨骨折
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Mar 1;55(3):220-223. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.03.011.
6
[Treatment of Sanders typeⅡto Ⅲ calcaneal fractures with percutaneous reduction and minimally invasive calcaneal screw fixation].经皮复位及微创跟骨螺钉固定治疗SandersⅡ至Ⅲ型跟骨骨折
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2023 Apr 25;36(4):313-9. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.04.004.
7
[A prospective study on treatment of Sanders type and calcaneal fractures with interlocking intramedullary nail fixation system].[带锁髓内钉固定系统治疗SandersⅡ、Ⅲ型跟骨骨折的前瞻性研究]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 15;38(3):303-308. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202312076.
8
A novel minimally invasive percutaneous treatment for Essex-Lopresti joint depression-type DIACFs by ligamentotaxis.经韧带牵引术治疗 Essex-Lopresti 关节凹陷型 DIACFs 的新型微创经皮治疗方法。
BMC Surg. 2022 Dec 16;22(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01868-6.
9
Clinical comparison of modified sinus tarsi approach and L-shaped approach in open reduction and internal fixation for Sanders typeIII-IV intra-articular calcaneal fractures: Complications, security, effectiveness analysis.改良距下窦入路与L形入路切开复位内固定治疗SandersⅢ-Ⅳ型跟骨关节内骨折的临床比较:并发症、安全性、有效性分析
J Orthop Sci. 2025 Feb 26. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2025.02.004.
10
[Comparative study on curative effect of minimally invasive locking plate for the treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures via sinus tarsi approach].[经跗骨窦入路微创锁定钢板治疗跟骨关节内骨折的疗效对比研究]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021 Sep 25;34(9):794-800. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.09.002.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of the Subtalar Joint Following Calcaneal Fracture Malunion.跟骨骨折畸形愈合后距下关节的处理。
Foot Ankle Clin. 2022 Dec;27(4):787-803. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2022.08.001.
2
An evaluation of the efficacy of percutaneous reduction and screw fixation without bone grafting in Sanders Type-II and Type-III displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures.评估经皮复位螺钉固定术治疗 Sanders Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型关节内移位跟骨骨折不植骨的疗效。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 10;23(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05515-2.
3
A historical review of calcaneal fractures: from the crucifixion of Jesus Christ and Don Juan injuries to the current plate osteosynthesis.
跟跟骨骨折的历史回顾:从耶稣受难和唐璜伤害到目前的钢板内固定。
Int Orthop. 2022 Jun;46(6):1413-1422. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05384-3. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
4
Calcaneal Fractures-Which Approach for Which Fracture?跟骨骨折——何种骨折采用何种入路?
Orthop Clin North Am. 2021 Oct;52(4):433-450. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2021.05.012. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
5
Osteosynthesis or primary arthrodesis for displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures Sanders type IV - A systematic review. Sanders Ⅳ 型移位关节内跟骨骨折的内固定或一期关节融合术:系统评价。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Apr;28(3):281-287. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
6
C-Nail versus plate osteosynthesis in displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures-a comparative retrospective study.C 型钉与钢板内固定治疗移位关节内跟骨骨折的比较回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Mar 20;16(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02349-x.
7
Outcome of Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis for Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures Using Cannulated Screws: A Prospective Case Series.采用空心螺钉微创治疗关节内移位跟骨骨折的疗效:一项前瞻性病例系列研究。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Jan-Feb;60(1):55-60. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.06.017. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
8
Quality of Reduction of Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures Using a Sinus Tarsi Versus Extensile Lateral Approach.采用跗骨窦入路与扩大外侧入路治疗移位性关节内跟骨骨折的复位质量
J Orthop Trauma. 2021 Jun 1;35(6):285-288. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001971.
9
Comparison of 5 Treatment Approaches for Displaced Intra-articular Calcaneal Fractures: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.移位性关节内跟骨骨折的5种治疗方法比较:系统评价与贝叶斯网络Meta分析
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 Nov-Dec;59(6):1254-1264. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.03.021. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
10
Sinus tarsi approach versus the extended lateral approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.距下窦入路与扩大外侧入路治疗移位性关节内跟骨骨折的系统评价和Meta分析
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Oct;141(10):1659-1667. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03554-9. Epub 2020 Jul 30.