Lampe R M, Weir M R, Spier J, Rhodes M F
Pediatrics. 1985 Jul;76(1):75-8.
Acoustic reflectometry, a new technique for detecting middle ear effusion, was compared with results from tympanocentesis or myringotomy in 75 patients (141 ears). There was a highly significant association (P less than .0001) for ears having middle ear effusion with high reflectivity (5 through 9 units) and for ears having no middle ear effusion with low reflectivity (0 through 4 units). In a pediatric population with middle ear effusion present in 98 of 141 ears and using reflectivity readings greater than 4 to indicate middle ear effusion, the sensitivity of this technique was 86.7% and the specificity was 69.8%. False-positive errors usually occurred in ears with thick tympanic membranes, or in ears in which reflectivity was determined prior to the induction of anesthesia. False-negative errors usually occurred in ears with both air and fluid. This technique was validated by direct comparison with tympanocentesis or myringotomy and can be used with pneumatic otoscopy and impedance tympanometry to follow children with middle ear effusion.
声反射测量法是一种检测中耳积液的新技术,在75例患者(141只耳朵)中,将其与鼓膜穿刺术或鼓膜切开术的结果进行了比较。对于有中耳积液且反射率高(5至9个单位)的耳朵,以及没有中耳积液且反射率低(0至4个单位)的耳朵,存在高度显著的相关性(P小于0.0001)。在141只耳朵中有98只存在中耳积液的儿科人群中,使用大于4的反射率读数来指示中耳积液,该技术的敏感性为86.7%,特异性为69.8%。假阳性错误通常发生在鼓膜增厚的耳朵中,或在麻醉诱导前测定反射率的耳朵中。假阴性错误通常发生在既有空气又有液体的耳朵中。该技术通过与鼓膜穿刺术或鼓膜切开术直接比较得到验证,可与鼓气耳镜检查和阻抗测听法一起用于跟踪患有中耳积液的儿童。