• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项对中国地表水中农药所构成风险长达十年的荟萃分析。

A decade-long meta-analysis of risks posed by pesticides in Chinese surface waters.

作者信息

Li Jiuying, Hou Lin, Liu Na, Rao Kaifeng, Zheng Jing, Xu Jian, Giesy John P, Jin Xiaowei

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China; China National Environmental Monitoring Centre, Beijing, 100012, China.

Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2025 Jul;387:125898. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125898. Epub 2025 May 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125898
PMID:40403657
Abstract

Despite their global benefits to agriculture, pesticides pose potential risks to wildlife as well as to the structure and function of ecological communities. A comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted to assess the occurrence, toxicity effects, and ecological risks of pesticides in the surface water of major river basins of China from 2012 to 2023. Using a multi-tier risk assessment, exposure and ecotoxicity data were analyzed and compared for 58 priority pesticides, revealing widespread contamination across major river basins. Among the 46 frequently detected pesticides, concentrations ranged from non-detectable to 12,100 ng/L, with hazard quotients (HQ) ranging from a maximum of 21,764.71 for deltamethrin to a minimum of 0.01 for carbaryl. The Pearl, Huai, and Yangtze River basins exhibited the greatest concentrations of pesticides, particularly in regions with intensive agricultural activity. Base on HQ screening, the hierarchical risk assessment identified 20 "high-risk" pesticides, while semi-probabilistic analysis further prioritized 13 compounds out of 28 pesticides with prioritization index (PI) > 1.0. Notably, probabilistic risk assessment revealed that, over the decade, bifenthrin and λ-cyhalothrin posed the greatest threats, with maximum risk products (the product of exceedance probability and magnitude of effect) of 81.24 % and 76.96 %, respectively. These findings demonstrate that pyrethroid insecticides present the greatest risks to aquatic organisms in Chinese surface waters. This systematic evaluation provides critical insights for evidence-based environmental management strategies and underscores the urgent need for enhanced monitoring of greater-risk pesticides to protect aquatic biodiversity.

摘要

尽管农药对农业具有全球效益,但它们对野生动物以及生态群落的结构和功能构成潜在风险。进行了一项全面的荟萃分析,以评估2012年至2023年中国主要流域地表水中农药的存在情况、毒性效应和生态风险。采用多层次风险评估方法,对58种优先农药的暴露和生态毒性数据进行了分析和比较,结果显示主要流域普遍受到污染。在46种经常检测到的农药中,浓度范围从未检测到至12100纳克/升,危害商数(HQ)范围从溴氰菊酯的最高21764.71到西维因的最低0.01。珠江、淮河和长江流域的农药浓度最高,特别是在农业活动密集的地区。基于HQ筛选,分层风险评估确定了20种“高风险”农药,而半概率分析进一步对28种优先指数(PI)>1.0的农药中的13种化合物进行了优先排序。值得注意的是,概率风险评估显示,在这十年中,联苯菊酯和高效氯氟氰菊酯构成的威胁最大,最大风险产品(超标概率与效应大小的乘积)分别为81.24%和76.96%。这些发现表明,拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂对中国地表水中的水生生物构成最大风险。这一系统评估为基于证据的环境管理策略提供了关键见解,并强调迫切需要加强对高风险农药的监测,以保护水生生物多样性。

相似文献

1
A decade-long meta-analysis of risks posed by pesticides in Chinese surface waters.一项对中国地表水中农药所构成风险长达十年的荟萃分析。
J Environ Manage. 2025 Jul;387:125898. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125898. Epub 2025 May 21.
2
Contaminants in the Richelieu River (Quebec, Canada) and toxicity to early life stage river (Moxostoma carinatum) and copper redhorse (Moxostoma hubbsi).加拿大魁北克省黎塞留河中的污染物及其对河川早期生命阶段的细纹真鮰(Moxostoma carinatum)和铜红马真鮰(Moxostoma hubbsi)的毒性。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2025 Jul 1;21(4):926-942. doi: 10.1093/inteam/vjaf039.
3
Applying the water quality indices, geographical information system, and advanced decision-making techniques to assess the suitability of surface water for drinking purposes in Brahmani River Basin (BRB), Odisha.应用水质指标、地理信息系统和先进的决策技术来评估奥里萨邦布拉马尼河流域(BRB)地表水用于饮用目的的适宜性。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 May;32(23):13638-13673. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36329-z. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
4
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
A probabilistic approach to chronic effects assessments for listed species in a vernal pool case study.在一个春季池塘案例研究中,对列入名录物种进行慢性影响评估的概率方法。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2024 Sep;20(5):1654-1666. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4932. Epub 2024 May 2.
7
Monitoring, sources, receptors, and control measures for three European Union watch list substances of emerging concern in receiving waters - A 20year systematic review.监测、来源、受体和接收水中三种新兴关注的欧盟关注物质的控制措施——20 年系统评价。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 1;574:1140-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.084. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
8
Pesticide water pollution, human health risks, and regulatory evaluation: A nationwide analysis in Ethiopia.农药水污染、人类健康风险与监管评估:埃塞俄比亚全国性分析。
J Hazard Mater. 2024 Oct 5;478:135326. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135326. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
9
Occurrence of pharmaceuticals, illicit drugs and PFAS in global surface waters: A meta-analysis-based review.全球地表水中药物、非法药物和全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质的存在情况:基于荟萃分析的综述
Environ Pollut. 2025 Aug 1;378:126412. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126412. Epub 2025 May 9.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.