• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪种肥胖指数最佳?一项人群研究中五种指标的比较及其识别2型糖尿病风险的能力。

Which adiposity index is best? Comparison of five indicators and their ability to identify type 2 diabetes risk in a population study.

作者信息

Huang Cunrong, Lopes Andre, Britton Annie

机构信息

Research Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, United Kingdom.

Cancer Research UK & Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2025 Jul;225:112268. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112268. Epub 2025 May 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112268
PMID:40404050
Abstract

AIMS

We compared ability of five adiposity indicators [body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), waist-by-height (WHT.5R), and a body shape index (ABSI)] to identify current diabetes and their prospective associations with diabetes.

METHODS

Baseline data were from 7,979 participants of UK Whitehall II study, of whom 7,488 diabetes-free participants were followed-up (median = 16.0 years) for incident diabetes (n = 940). According to five indices' cut-points, participants were separately classified into low-value groups and high-value groups. We cross-sectionally investigated ability of the indicators to identify existing diabetes by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and explored prospective associations between elevated indices and diabetes using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Waist-based indicators were superior to BMI in identifying diabetes. High WHtR (≥0.5) demonstrated the highest multivariable-adjusted HR [2.64 (95 % CI 2.29, 3.03)]. Across all indicators, associations between elevated indicators and diabetes were stronger in younger participants. In combined analyses, "low BMI but high WHtR" had higher risk for diabetes [2.20 (95 % CI 1.65, 2.95)] than "high BMI but low WHtR" [1.34 (95 % CI 1.05, 1.70)].

CONCLUSION

Waist-based indicators are more strongly associated with diabetes than BMI. WHtR, an easy-to-calculate, waist-based index with a sex- and race-independent cut-point, may be useful for diabetes prevention.

摘要

目的

我们比较了五个肥胖指标[体重指数(BMI)、腰围(WC)、腰高比(WHtR)、腰乘高(WHT.5R)和体型指数(ABSI)]识别当前糖尿病的能力及其与糖尿病的前瞻性关联。

方法

基线数据来自英国白厅II研究的7979名参与者,其中7488名无糖尿病参与者接受了糖尿病发病随访(中位数=16.0年)(n=940)。根据五个指标的切点,参与者被分别分为低值组和高值组。我们通过受试者工作特征曲线分析横断面研究了这些指标识别现有糖尿病的能力,并使用Cox回归分析探讨了指标升高与糖尿病之间的前瞻性关联。

结果

基于腰围的指标在识别糖尿病方面优于BMI。高WHtR(≥0.5)显示出最高的多变量调整后HR[2.64(95%CI 2.29,3.03)]。在所有指标中,指标升高与糖尿病之间的关联在年轻参与者中更强。在综合分析中,“低BMI但高WHtR”患糖尿病的风险[2.20(95%CI 1.65,2.95)]高于“高BMI但低WHtR”[1.34(95%CI 1.05,1.70)]。

结论

基于腰围的指标与糖尿病的关联比BMI更强。WHtR是一个易于计算的、基于腰围的指数,其切点不依赖性别和种族,可能对糖尿病预防有用。

相似文献

1
Which adiposity index is best? Comparison of five indicators and their ability to identify type 2 diabetes risk in a population study.哪种肥胖指数最佳?一项人群研究中五种指标的比较及其识别2型糖尿病风险的能力。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2025 Jul;225:112268. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112268. Epub 2025 May 20.
2
Prediction of a new body shape index and body adiposity estimator for development of type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Rural Chinese Cohort Study.预测2型糖尿病发病的新型体型指数和体脂估计指标:中国农村队列研究
Br J Nutr. 2017 Nov;118(10):771-776. doi: 10.1017/S0007114517002859. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
3
Using different anthropometric indices to assess prediction ability of type 2 diabetes in elderly population: a 5 year prospective study.采用不同人体测量学指标评估老年 2 型糖尿病预测能力的前瞻性研究:5 年随访。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0912-2.
4
Comparison of Different Obesity Indices for Predicting Incident Hypertension.不同肥胖指数对预测高血压发病的比较。
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2017 Jun;24(2):157-166. doi: 10.1007/s40292-017-0186-3. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
5
Determining the best method for evaluating obesity and the risk for non-communicable diseases in women of childbearing age by measuring the body mass index, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, A Body Shape Index, and hip index.探讨通过测量体重指数、腰围、腰臀比、腰围身高比、身体质量指数(A Body Shape Index)和臀围指数来评估育龄妇女肥胖和非传染性疾病风险的最佳方法。
Nutrition. 2023 Oct;114:112135. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2023.112135. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
6
Stronger Associations of Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference with Diabetes than Waist-Height Ratio and Triglyceride Glucose Index in the Middle-Aged and Elderly Population: A Retrospective Cohort Study.与腰高比和甘油三酯葡萄糖指数相比,体质指数和腰围与中老年人群糖尿病的相关性更强:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Diabetes Res. 2022 Feb 26;2022:9982390. doi: 10.1155/2022/9982390. eCollection 2022.
7
Comparison of anthropometric indices (body mass index, waist circumference, waist to hip ratio and waist to height ratio) in predicting risk of type II diabetes in the population of Yazd, Iran.伊朗亚兹德人群中人体测量指标(体重指数、腰围、腰臀比和腰高比)在预测2型糖尿病风险方面的比较。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2018 Sep;12(5):677-682. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
8
Association of body mass index and waist circumference with type 2 diabetes mellitus in older adults: a cross-sectional study.体质指数和腰围与老年人 2 型糖尿病的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jun 7;22(1):489. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03145-w.
9
Waist-to-height ratio, waist circumference, body mass index, waist divided by height and the risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity: A national longitudinal cohort study.腰高比、腰围、身体质量指数、腰高比和心血管代谢多重疾病风险:一项全国纵向队列研究。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Aug 26;31(9):2644-2651. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.05.026. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
10
Waist circumference, body mass index and waist-height ratio: Are two indices better than one for identifying hypertension risk in older adults?腰围、体重指数和腰高比:对于识别老年人的高血压风险,两个指标是否比一个指标更好?
Prev Med. 2016 Dec;93:76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The WHO BMI System Misclassifies Weight Status in Adults from the General Population in North Italy: A DXA-Based Assessment Study (18-98 Years).世界卫生组织的体重指数系统对意大利北部普通人群中成年人的体重状况分类错误:一项基于双能X线吸收法的评估研究(18 - 98岁)
Nutrients. 2025 Jun 29;17(13):2162. doi: 10.3390/nu17132162.