Suppr超能文献

氨甲环酸在吸脂手术患者中控制手术失血效果的比较分析

Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Tranexamic Acid in Controlling Surgical Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Liposuction.

作者信息

Kandulu Hüseyin

机构信息

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon, Kandulu Clinic for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Teşvikiye, Terrace Fulya Teşvikiye Mah. Hakkı Yeten Cad.No.13 Center 1 Kat 11 D.59, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04852-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Liposuction is one of the most popular plastic surgeries, and blood loss is one of its major complications. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic drug, has been shown to reduce blood loss in many surgeries. In this prospective study, the effect of TXA on blood loss in patients, who underwent three different procedures including suction-assisted lipoplasty, vibrational amplification of sound energy at resonance (VASER)-assisted lipoplasty and LipoSaver, was compared.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients were enrolled in the study. Patients who underwent VASER2.2 technology were assigned to group 1 (n = 12), patients who underwent LipoSaver2000 technology were assigned to group 2 (n = 12), and patients who underwent SAL were assigned to group 3 (n = 11). For each patient, demographic data, tumescent solution and aspirate volumes, and hemoglobin and hematocrit values in the aspirate were compared.

RESULTS

There was no difference in tumescent volume between the groups, but the aspirate volume from group 3 was significantly higher than the aspirate volume of group 1 (p = 0.001). No difference was detected in terms of Hgb and Hct values in each liter of aspirate, both in terms of the applied liposuction method and TXA application. Additionally, no correlation was observed between gender, age, total inflated volume, total aspirate volume and device use time and Hgb and Htc values in the aspirate.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were determined between lipoaspirate, VASER, LipoSaver and SAL in terms of blood loss, and TXA application did not significantly change the Hgb and Htc values in lipoaspirate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

摘要

背景

抽脂术是最受欢迎的整形手术之一,失血是其主要并发症之一。氨甲环酸(TXA)是一种抗纤溶药物,已被证明可减少许多手术中的失血。在这项前瞻性研究中,比较了TXA对接受三种不同手术(包括吸脂辅助脂肪抽吸术、共振声能振动放大辅助脂肪抽吸术和LipoSaver)患者失血的影响。

方法

35名患者纳入研究。接受VASER2.2技术的患者被分配到第1组(n = 12),接受LipoSaver2000技术的患者被分配到第2组(n = 12),接受吸脂辅助脂肪抽吸术的患者被分配到第3组(n = 11)。比较每位患者的人口统计学数据、肿胀液和吸出物量以及吸出物中的血红蛋白和血细胞比容值。

结果

各组间肿胀液量无差异,但第3组的吸出物量显著高于第1组(p = 0.001)。就所应用的抽脂方法和TXA应用而言,每升吸出物中的血红蛋白和血细胞比容值均未检测到差异。此外,未观察到性别、年龄、总膨胀量、总吸出物量和设备使用时间与吸出物中的血红蛋白和血细胞比容值之间存在相关性。

结论

抽脂术、VASER、LipoSaver和吸脂辅助脂肪抽吸术在失血方面未确定有显著差异,且TXA应用未显著改变抽脂吸出物中的血红蛋白和血细胞比容值。

证据水平IV:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或作者在线指南www.springer.com/00266

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验