Li Xinyang, Liu Chong, Hu Haidi
Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110004, China.
BMC Nephrol. 2025 May 22;26(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04182-4.
An arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the most common type of vascular access, given its low infection rate, few complications, good patency potential, and long service life. Although preferred for most patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), those undergoing dialysis continue to experience AVF surgical failures and complications, with 60% of AVFs failing to mature. The anastomotic angles chosen for AVF creation are usually ones that surgeons find easiest to manually control. At present, many sources have confirmed that variations in anastomotic angle culminate in differing geometric parameters of perianastomotic blood vessels, thus affecting the AVF maturation process.
This publication was intended to highlight the progress achieved with respect to AVF anastomotic angle conventions through collective outcomes of clinical analyses, basic research, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies, and VasQ external stent trials. The insights gained may well fuel clinical efforts to implement more durable blood channels in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). For our purposes, we described anastomotic angles as acute (< 30°), intermediate (30-70°), or obtuse (> 70°), rather than invoking mathematical standards.
In clinical research, two studies support the acute angle, three studies support the intermediate angle, three studies support the obtuse angle. In CFD research, one article supports the acute angle, six articles support the intermediate angle, and one article supports obtuse angles.
Our analysis demonstrates an intermediate angle of 30-70° would be an optimal angle for AVF anastomosis, according to the existing research results. VasQ external stent devices have yielded superior AVF maturity and patency by maintaining anastomosed arteries and veins at angles of 40-50°, resulting in improved patient outcomes clinically, which supports the use of the device in the clinical practice.
Not applicable.
动静脉内瘘(AVF)是最常见的血管通路类型,因其感染率低、并发症少、通畅潜力好且使用寿命长。尽管大多数慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者首选AVF,但接受透析的患者仍会经历AVF手术失败和并发症,60%的AVF未能成熟。创建AVF时选择的吻合角度通常是外科医生认为最易于手动控制的角度。目前,许多资料已证实吻合角度的变化最终会导致吻合口周围血管的几何参数不同,从而影响AVF的成熟过程。
本出版物旨在通过临床分析、基础研究、计算流体动力学(CFD)研究和VasQ外部支架试验的综合结果,突出在AVF吻合角度规范方面取得的进展。所获得的见解很可能推动临床努力为终末期肾病(ESKD)患者建立更持久的血流通路。就我们的目的而言,我们将吻合角度描述为锐角(<30°)、中间角(30 - 70°)或钝角(>70°),而非引用数学标准。
在临床研究中,两项研究支持锐角,三项研究支持中间角,三项研究支持钝角。在CFD研究中,一篇文章支持锐角,六篇文章支持中间角,一篇文章支持钝角。
根据现有研究结果,我们的分析表明30 - 70°的中间角是AVF吻合的最佳角度。VasQ外部支架装置通过将吻合的动脉和静脉维持在40 - 50°的角度,使AVF具有更高的成熟度和通畅率,在临床上改善了患者的预后,这支持了该装置在临床实践中的应用。
不适用。