Shah Amar, Sharma Ria, Shah Anirudh
Amardeep Multispecialty Children Hospital and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2025 May-Jun;30(3):382-386. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_272_24. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
The aims of this study were to compare surgical outcomes of conventional open inguinal hernia repair (OR) with laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia (LR) repair in Indian children operated by a single surgeon.
This is a retrospective (historical) nonrandomized cohort study of 1595 children with unilateral inguinal hernia for 10 years. All children who presented with unilateral inguinal hernia were included in this study. The study was divided into two phases of 5 years each, and patients were classified into Group 1 and Group 2. In the first 5 years (Group 1), all the children with unilateral inguinal hernia underwent conventional open repair. Over the next 5 years (Group 2), all the children with unilateral inguinal hernia underwent laparoscopic repair. All the operations were performed by the same surgeon who was well acquainted with laparoscopic surgery. Parameters studied included gender, side of the hernia, time of surgery, incidence of contralateral patent processus vaginalis (PPV), development of metachronous contralateral hernia, and complications.
A total of 1595 children with unilateral inguinal hernia were studied. Nine hundred and forty-five patients underwent OR (Group 1), and 650 patients underwent LR (Group 2). The male-to-female ratio in Group 1 was 2.5:1, and in Group 2 was 2.4:1. Right inguinal hernia was present in 59%, whereas 41% had a left inguinal hernia. In Group 1, 8% of children developed metachronous contralateral hernias. In Group 2, the contralateral processus vaginalis was found to be patent in 260 children. However, only 10% (26) of these children developed metachronous contralateral hernia on follow-up. In the present study, a significantly higher recurrence rate (2.5%) was observed in the LR group as compared to the OR group (0.3%). The overall operative time was lesser in the OR group (15 ± 8.4 min) versus LR group (25 ± 10 min).
Only 10% of children with contralateral PPV in our study went on to develop a symptomatic hernia. Hence, we believe that upfront closure of the contralateral PPV with unilateral inguinal hernia may not be necessary. LR has a longer operating time and higher recurrence rates. The choice of technique depends on factors such as the availability of laparoscopic equipment and infrastructure, surgeon's preference, and expertise.
本研究旨在比较由单一外科医生为印度儿童实施的传统开放性腹股沟疝修补术(OR)与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LR)的手术效果。
这是一项对1595例单侧腹股沟疝儿童进行的为期10年的回顾性(历史性)非随机队列研究。所有出现单侧腹股沟疝的儿童均纳入本研究。研究分为两个阶段,各为期5年,患者分为第1组和第2组。在前5年(第1组),所有单侧腹股沟疝儿童均接受传统开放性修补术。在接下来的5年(第2组),所有单侧腹股沟疝儿童均接受腹腔镜修补术。所有手术均由同一位熟悉腹腔镜手术的外科医生进行。研究的参数包括性别、疝的侧别、手术时间、对侧鞘突未闭(PPV)的发生率、异时性对侧疝的发生情况以及并发症。
共研究了1595例单侧腹股沟疝儿童。945例患者接受了OR手术(第1组),650例患者接受了LR手术(第2组)。第1组男女比例为2.5:1,第2组为2.4:1。右侧腹股沟疝占59%,而左侧腹股沟疝占41%。在第1组中,8%的儿童发生了异时性对侧疝。在第2组中,发现260例儿童对侧鞘突未闭。然而,这些儿童在随访中只有10%(26例)发生了异时性对侧疝。在本研究中,LR组的复发率(2.5%)显著高于OR组(0.3%)。OR组的总体手术时间(15±8.4分钟)比LR组(25±10分钟)短。
在我们的研究中,只有10%对侧PPV的儿童发展为有症状的疝。因此,我们认为对于单侧腹股沟疝,预先闭合对侧PPV可能没有必要。LR手术时间更长,复发率更高。技术的选择取决于腹腔镜设备和基础设施的可用性、外科医生的偏好和专业技能等因素。