• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Robotic vs Laparoscopic vs Open Ventral Hernia Repair: Insights from a Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

作者信息

Almiron da R Soares Giulia, de Oliveira Filho Josélio Rodrigues, Bregion Pedro Bicudo, Juca Rafaela Hamada, Barbosa Lucas M, Silva Raquel Oliveira de S, Cavalcante Deivyd Vieira Silva, de Figueiredo Sergio Mazzola Poli, Ivano Victor Kenzo

机构信息

From the Department of Medicine, Universidade Metropolitana de Santos, São Paulo, Brazil (Almiron da R Soares).

Complexo de Doenças Infectocontagiosas Dr Clementino Fraga, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil (de Oliveira Filho).

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2025 Oct 1;241(4):550-563. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001455. Epub 2025 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1097/XCS.0000000000001455
PMID:40407202
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ventral hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide, yet there is no consensus on the safest and most effective approach. This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the optimal surgical technique for ventral hernia repair.

STUDY DESIGN

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials comparing surgical interventions for ventral hernia repair. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted, pooling risk ratios for binary outcomes and mean differences for continuous outcomes with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

A total of 34 studies with 3,779 patients were included. No significant differences were observed in recurrence, seroma, or hematoma rates between groups. Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus significantly reduced hospital stays compared with open surgery (mean difference -2.24 days; 95% CI -3.26 to -1.23) and wound infection risk (risk ratio 0.29; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.41) compared with open surgery. The robotic approach was associated with increased operative time compared with both laparoscopic and open approaches (mean difference -49.08 minutes; 95% CI -87.77 to -10.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic and robotic techniques demonstrated similar efficacy in recurrence, seroma, and hematoma rates. Although open surgery remains a more cost-effective approach, it was associated with a higher risk of wound infections. Given these findings, the choice of surgical technique should be individualized based on patient-specific factors, surgeon expertise, and institutional resources to optimize both clinical and economic outcomes.

摘要

相似文献

1
Robotic vs Laparoscopic vs Open Ventral Hernia Repair: Insights from a Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
J Am Coll Surg. 2025 Oct 1;241(4):550-563. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001455. Epub 2025 Sep 16.
2
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
3
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
4
"Comparative safety and efficacy of robotic TAPP and IPOM techniques in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Short-term Outcomes".机器人经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)和腹腔内网片修补术(IPOM)在腹疝修补中的安全性和疗效比较:短期结果的系统评价和荟萃分析
Hernia. 2025 Aug 19;29(1):255. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03454-0.
5
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜技术与开放技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785.
6
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
7
Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair.腹腔镜与开放手术技术用于腹侧或切口疝修补术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16(3):CD007781. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007781.pub2.
8
Meta-analysis and systematic review of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for elective incisional hernia.腹腔镜与开放网片修补术治疗择期切口疝的Meta分析和系统评价
Hernia. 2015 Jun;19(3):449-63. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1351-z. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
9
Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias.切口疝的开放手术方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD006438. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006438.pub2.
10
Systematic review and meta-analysis on robotic assisted ventral hernia repair: the ROVER review.机器人辅助腹疝修补术的系统评价与荟萃分析:ROVER评价
Hernia. 2025 Feb 18;29(1):95. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03274-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Elective Umbilical Hernia Repair in Adults in the 21st Century: Challenging the Status Quo.21世纪成人择期脐疝修补术:挑战现状
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 7;14(17):6324. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176324.