• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纳入时间依赖性炎症生物标志物的动态预测模型的开发增强了II期或III期胃癌根治性手术后的复发预测。

Development of a dynamic prediction model with the inclusion of time-dependent inflammatory biomarker enhances recurrence prediction after curative surgery for stage II or III gastric cancer.

作者信息

Aluariachy Larbi, Oba Koji, Matsuyama Yutaka, Kuroda Akihiro, Okumura Yasuhiro, Yagi Koichi, Oshima Yoko, Fukagawa Takeo, Shimada Hideaki, Seto Yasuyuki

机构信息

Graduate School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, 4-1-26, Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-8402, Japan.

Interfaculty Initiative in Information Studies, the University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2025 Aug 3;55(8):871-879. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaf075.

DOI:10.1093/jjco/hyaf075
PMID:40407276
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postoperative recurrence prediction models for gastric cancer often rely on preoperative or immediate postoperative data, overlooking time-dependent biomarkers from follow-up visits. By incorporating longitudinal biomarker data through a landmarking approach, this study aims to enhance recurrence risk prediction.

METHODS

This multicenter study included patients who underwent curative surgery for stage II-III gastric cancer from January 2010 to December 2016 in three hospitals in Tokyo, Japan. Their demographic, clinical, and biomarker data were collected from medical records. Biomarkers were collected at surgery and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Three prediction models-baseline model, landmarking 1.0, and landmarking 1.5-were developed and compared in terms of their prediction accuracy using four measures: concordance probability, calibration plot, Kaplan-Meier curves stratified with predicted risk, and Net Reclassification Improvement. The models aimed to predict recurrence within three years after surgery, with predictions made one year postsurgery.

RESULTS

The study included 274 patients with gastric cancer, with 62 (22.6%) events occurring within three years. As a result of the variable selection process, lymphatic venous Invasion (LVI), pathological T (pT) stage, pathological N (pN) stage, and baseline prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were chosen. Additionally, in landmarking 1.0 and 1.5, S1 treatment status and PNI-change were also selected as time-dependent predictors. Landmarking 1.5, which incorporates time-dependent biomarkers until one year postsurgery, showed superior performance to the other models in all four measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Prediction models incorporating postoperative information could serve as a decision-making tool in clinical practice to more precisely distinguish between patients with high and low risk of recurrence.

摘要

背景

胃癌术后复发预测模型通常依赖术前或术后即刻的数据,而忽略了随访中的时间依赖性生物标志物。本研究通过一种标志性方法纳入纵向生物标志物数据,旨在提高复发风险预测能力。

方法

这项多中心研究纳入了2010年1月至2016年12月在日本东京三家医院接受II-III期胃癌根治性手术的患者。从病历中收集他们的人口统计学、临床和生物标志物数据。在手术时以及术后3、6、9和12个月收集生物标志物。开发了三个预测模型——基线模型、标志性1.0模型和标志性1.5模型,并使用四种指标比较它们的预测准确性:一致性概率、校准图、按预测风险分层的Kaplan-Meier曲线以及净重新分类改善。这些模型旨在预测术后三年内的复发情况,预测在术后一年进行。

结果

该研究纳入了274例胃癌患者,其中62例(22.6%)在三年内出现复发事件。经过变量选择过程,选择了淋巴管侵犯(LVI)、病理T(pT)分期、病理N(pN)分期和基线预后营养指数(PNI)。此外,在标志性1.0和1.5模型中,S1治疗状态和PNI变化也被选为时间依赖性预测因子。纳入术后一年时间依赖性生物标志物的标志性1.5模型在所有四项指标上均表现优于其他模型。

结论

纳入术后信息的预测模型可作为临床实践中的决策工具,以更精确地区分复发风险高和低的患者。

相似文献

1
Development of a dynamic prediction model with the inclusion of time-dependent inflammatory biomarker enhances recurrence prediction after curative surgery for stage II or III gastric cancer.纳入时间依赖性炎症生物标志物的动态预测模型的开发增强了II期或III期胃癌根治性手术后的复发预测。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2025 Aug 3;55(8):871-879. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaf075.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
4
The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery.生物标志物对改良心脏风险指数在预测非心脏手术患者主要不良心脏事件和全因死亡率方面的比较和附加预后价值。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD013139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013139.pub2.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the preoperative locoregional staging of primary gastric cancer.内镜超声检查(EUS)对原发性胃癌术前局部区域分期的诊断准确性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 6;2015(2):CD009944. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009944.pub2.
6
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
7
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.缺失数据的存在是否会影响 SORG 机器学习算法在脊柱转移瘤患者中的性能?开发一种互联网应用算法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):143-157. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002706. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
8
What Are the Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes of a Modified Cup-cage Technique for Pelvic Discontinuity?改良杯笼技术治疗骨盆不连续性的功能、影像学和生存结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2149-2160. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003186. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
9
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
10
Prognosis of adults and children following a first unprovoked seizure.首次无诱因发作后成人和儿童的预后。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 23;1(1):CD013847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013847.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Management challenges and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in remnant gastric cancer: an analysis of 313 patients from the KEGG multicenter observational study.残胃癌的辅助化疗的管理挑战和作用:KEGG 多中心观察性研究的 313 例患者分析。
Gastric Cancer. 2024 Nov;27(6):1302-1310. doi: 10.1007/s10120-024-01544-z. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
2
Applying artificial intelligence using routine clinical data for preoperative diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer.利用常规临床数据应用人工智能进行胃癌的术前诊断和预后评估。
Oncol Lett. 2023 Oct 4;26(5):499. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.14087. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Proposal of the Second Cutoff of Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels to Stratify Patients into Low, Intermediate, and High Risks at Recurrences after Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer.
胃癌根治性切除术后复发时血清癌胚抗原水平第二次截断值的提议,用于将患者分层为低、中、高风险。
Dig Surg. 2023;40(6):187-195. doi: 10.1159/000533143. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
4
Predicting peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer with serosal invasion using a pathomics nomogram.使用病理组学列线图预测伴有浆膜侵犯的胃癌腹膜复发情况。
iScience. 2023 Mar 3;26(3):106246. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106246. eCollection 2023 Mar 17.
5
Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021 (6th edition).日本胃癌治疗指南 2021(第 6 版)。
Gastric Cancer. 2023 Jan;26(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10120-022-01331-8. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
6
Predicting peritoneal recurrence and disease-free survival from CT images in gastric cancer with multitask deep learning: a retrospective study.利用多任务深度学习从胃癌CT图像预测腹膜复发和无病生存期:一项回顾性研究
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 May;4(5):e340-e350. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00040-1.
7
Dynamic Prediction of Survival after Curative Resection of Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A landmarking-based analysis.胃腺癌根治性切除术后生存的动态预测:基于标志点的分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 May;48(5):1025-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.127. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
8
Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Centred Systems in the Diagnosis and Postoperative Surveillance of Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies Using Computed Tomography Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.人工智能为中心的系统在使用计算机断层扫描成像对上消化道恶性肿瘤进行诊断和术后监测中的诊断性能:诊断准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;29(3):1977-1990. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10882-6. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
9
Confidence intervals of prediction accuracy measures for multivariable prediction models based on the bootstrap-based optimism correction methods.基于 bootstrap 校正方法的多变量预测模型预测准确性度量的置信区间。
Stat Med. 2021 Nov 20;40(26):5691-5701. doi: 10.1002/sim.9148. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
10
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.