• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全膝关节置换周围的300例假体周围胫骨骨折:单机构的分类与结果

Three Hundred Periprosthetic Tibial Fractures Around a Total Knee Replacement: Classification and Outcomes from a Single Institution.

作者信息

Dugdale Evan M, Alter Thomas D, Stuart Michael J, Sems Stephen A, Yuan Brandon J, Spangehl Mark J, Springer Bryan D, Berry Daniel J, Abdel Matthew P

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 May 23;107(14):1579-1589. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.01407.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.24.01407
PMID:40408445
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic tibial fractures around a total knee replacement (TKR) remain challenging to manage, with little published information for guidance. The purpose of this study was to review the types, management techniques, and outcomes of periprosthetic tibial fractures in the largest series to date.

METHODS

We identified 300 periprosthetic tibial fractures (285 patients) around a TKR (43% in primary TKRs and 57% in revision TKRs) sustained between 1996 and 2020. Fractures were classified according to Felix et al. as Type I (tibial plateau), Type II (adjacent to stem), Type III (distal to stem), or Type IV (tibial tubercle), with subtypes A (well-fixed component), B (loose component), and C (intraoperative fracture). Of the fractures in this study, 53% were Type I, 24% were Type II, 16% were Type III, and 8% were Type IV. A total of 46% of fractures occurred intraoperatively, and 54% of fractures occurred postoperatively (61% subtype A, 39% subtype B). The mean patient age at fracture was 67 years, and 64% of patients were female. The mean follow-up was 6 years.

RESULTS

The intraoperative fracture incidence was 1.40% in revision TKRs and 0.10% in primary TKRs. Among intraoperative fractures, the 2-year survivorship free from tibial component revision was highest in Type I (100%) and lowest in Type IV (67%) (p < 0.001). For postoperative fractures, the 2-year survivorship free from any reoperation was 29% and the 2-year survivorship free from tibial component revision was 51%. Type-I postoperative fractures had the lowest 2-year survivorship free from tibial component revision (10%), whereas Type-III fractures had the highest survivorship (88%) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative periprosthetic fracture of the tibia was fourteenfold more likely in revision TKRs compared with primary TKRs. Among all intraoperative fractures, Type-I fractures were well-tolerated, with 100% survivorship free from tibial component revision at 2 years. Conversely, Type-I postoperative fractures had only 10% survivorship at 2 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

全膝关节置换术(TKR)周围的假体周围胫骨骨折的处理仍然具有挑战性,公开的指导信息很少。本研究的目的是回顾迄今为止最大系列的假体周围胫骨骨折的类型、处理技术和结果。

方法

我们确定了1996年至2020年间发生的300例TKR周围的假体周围胫骨骨折(285例患者)(初次TKR中占43%,翻修TKR中占57%)。骨折根据Felix等人的分类为I型(胫骨平台)、II型(靠近柄部)、III型(柄部远端)或IV型(胫骨结节),亚型为A(组件固定良好)、B(组件松动)和C(术中骨折)。本研究中的骨折,53%为I型,24%为II型,16%为III型,8%为IV型。共有46%的骨折发生在术中,54%的骨折发生在术后(A亚型占61%,B亚型占39%)。骨折时患者的平均年龄为67岁,64%的患者为女性。平均随访时间为6年。

结果

翻修TKR术中骨折发生率为1.40%,初次TKR术中骨折发生率为0.10%。在术中骨折中,I型骨折2年免于胫骨组件翻修的生存率最高(100%),IV型骨折最低(67%)(p<0.001)。对于术后骨折,2年免于任何再次手术的生存率为29%,2年免于胫骨组件翻修的生存率为51%。I型术后骨折2年免于胫骨组件翻修的生存率最低(10%),而III型骨折生存率最高(88%)(p<0.001)。

结论

与初次TKR相比,翻修TKR术中假体周围胫骨骨折的可能性高14倍。在所有术中骨折中,I型骨折耐受性良好,2年时免于胫骨组件翻修的生存率为100%。相反,I型术后骨折2年时生存率仅为10%。

证据水平

治疗性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者须知。

相似文献

1
Three Hundred Periprosthetic Tibial Fractures Around a Total Knee Replacement: Classification and Outcomes from a Single Institution.全膝关节置换周围的300例假体周围胫骨骨折:单机构的分类与结果
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 May 23;107(14):1579-1589. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.01407.
2
What Are the Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes of a Modified Cup-cage Technique for Pelvic Discontinuity?改良杯笼技术治疗骨盆不连续性的功能、影像学和生存结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2149-2160. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003186. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
3
Are There Differences in Performance Among Femoral Stem Brands Utilized in Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures?在用于治疗老年股骨颈骨折的非骨水泥半髋关节置换术中,不同品牌的股骨柄在性能上是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):253-264. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003222. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
4
No Difference in 10-year Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment in TKA: A Randomized Trial.全膝关节置换术中运动学与机械对线在10年临床或影像学结果上无差异:一项随机试验
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):140-149. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003193. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
5
Surgical Hip Dislocation in the Era of Hip Arthroscopy Demonstrates High Survivorship and Improvements in Patient-reported Outcomes for Complex Femoroacetabular Impingement.关节镜时代的髋关节脱位手术具有高存活率,并改善了复杂型股骨髋臼撞击症患者的报告结局。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1671-1682. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003032. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
6
Is 18 F-fluoride PET/CT an Accurate Tool to Diagnose Loosening After Total Joint Arthroplasty?18F-氟化物PET/CT是诊断全关节置换术后假体松动的准确工具吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):415-428. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003228. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
7
Composite Reconstruction With Irradiated Autograft Plus Total Hip Replacement After Type II Pelvic Resections for Tumors Is Feasible but Fraught With Complications.肿瘤Ⅱ型骨盆切除术后采用同种异体骨移植加全髋关节置换术进行复合重建是可行的,但并发症多。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Oct 1;482(10):1825-1835. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003097. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
8
What Factors Are Associated With Implant Revision in the Treatment of Pathologic Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures?在病理性股骨转子下骨折的治疗中,哪些因素与植入物翻修相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):473-484. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003291. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
9
Can Periprosthetic Joint Infection of Tumor Prostheses Be Controlled With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention?肿瘤假体周围关节感染能否通过清创、抗生素治疗和保留植入物来控制?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):49-58. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003184. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
10
Robotic Assistance Is Not Associated With Decreased Early Revisions in Cementless TKA: An Analysis of the American Joint Replacement Registry.机器人辅助与非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术早期翻修率降低无关:来自美国关节置换登记处的分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):431-438. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003330. Epub 2024 Nov 21.