Surendran Haripriya P, Sah Sujit K, Veeralakshmanan Priyadharshini, Nair Pranav, Ashok Hema P, Unnikrishnan Mazhuvancherry K, Kalavagunta Sruthi, Sasidharan Ajay, Chandran Dhanya, Poornachary Narmadha M, Dutta Debnarayan
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Amrita School of Pharmacy, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences and Technology, Dr. Vishwanath Karad MIT World Peace University, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Neurol India. 2025 May 1;73(3):429-445. doi: 10.4103/neurol-india.Neurol-India-D-24-00727. Epub 2025 May 23.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to gather credible sources of comprehensive information on the efficacy and radiation dose (maximum and minimum) to the hippocampus and contouring area to prevent cognitive dysfunction by hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT). This comprehensive review was conducted in compliance with PRISMA guidelines. The systematic literature search was performed across four databases including pubmed®, Scopus®, Cochrane Library®, and clinicaltrial.gov.in from inception until December 31, 2023. A total of nine eligible studies were selected encompassing a total of 680 patients with brain metastases who underwent radiation therapy. Notably, radiation exposure to the hippocampal area (3 to 7 mm margin) was avoided during whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). The maximum dose delivered to the hippocampus varied between 12.61 Gy and 17 Gy in different studies with minimum doses varying from 5.38 Gy to 10 Gy. HA-WBRT significantly preserves delayed recall compared to WBRT (p = <0.001, P = <0.001, <0.001 and P = 0.048), with an effect size (SMD: -0.57, 95% CI: -1.27, 0.12, P = 0.59, I2 = 0%) favoring HA-WBRT. However, the changes in psychomotor speed, visuospatial abilities, executive function, verbal fluency, and so on were not statistically significant between HA-WBRT and WBRT groups. This review underscores the significant positive impact of HA-WBRT in preventing radiation-induced neurocognitive dysfunction in brain metastatic patients, particularly in delayed recall. However, comprehensive cognitive preservation necessitates additional interventions alongside HA-WBRT.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在收集可靠的综合信息来源,以了解海马回避全脑放射治疗(HA-WBRT)在预防认知功能障碍方面的疗效以及对海马和靶区勾画区域的辐射剂量(最大和最小)。本综合评价按照PRISMA指南进行。系统文献检索在四个数据库中进行,包括pubmed®、Scopus®、Cochrane图书馆®和clinicaltrial.gov.in,检索时间从建库至2023年12月31日。共选择了9项符合条件的研究,涵盖了680例接受放射治疗的脑转移患者。值得注意的是,在全脑放射治疗(WBRT)期间避免了对海马区域(边缘3至7毫米)的辐射暴露。在不同研究中,给予海马的最大剂量在12.61 Gy至17 Gy之间变化,最小剂量在5.38 Gy至10 Gy之间变化。与WBRT相比,HA-WBRT显著保留了延迟回忆能力(p = <0.001,P = <0.001,<0.001和P = 0.048),效应大小(标准化均值差:-0.57,95%置信区间:-1.27,0.12,P = 0.59,I2 = 0%)有利于HA-WBRT。然而,HA-WBRT组和WBRT组在精神运动速度、视觉空间能力、执行功能、语言流畅性等方面的变化无统计学意义。本评价强调了HA-WBRT在预防脑转移患者放射性神经认知功能障碍方面的显著积极影响,特别是在延迟回忆方面。然而,要实现全面的认知保留,除HA-WBRT外还需要其他干预措施。