Connolly J A
Exp Cell Res. 1985 Aug;159(2):430-40. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4827(85)80016-1.
Both microtubules and microfilaments have been implicated in the exocytotic and endocytotic transport of coated and smooth surfaced membrane vesicles. We have reexamined this question by using specific pharmacological agents to disrupt these filaments and assess the effect on the movement of acetylcholine receptor (AChR) containing membrane vesicles in embryonic chick myotubes. Myotube cultures treated with nocodazole (0.6 microgram/ml) or colcemid (0.5 microgram/ml) (to disrupt microtubules) show only a 20-25% decrease in the number of cell surface AChRs after 48 h. Addition of chick brain extract (CBE) to cultured myotubes causes a significant increase in the total number of cell surface AChRs (measured by [125I]alpha-bungarotoxin (alpha-BGT) binding), thus providing us with a way to manipulate receptor and transport vesicle populations. Cultures treated with CBE plus nocodazole or colcemid show a 1.7-fold increase in AChR number over drug treatment alone, the same increase seen in cultures treated with CBE alone, although the total number remains about 20-25% less than that seen in control cultures. In cultures treated with cytochalasin D (0.2 microgram/ml) or dihydrocytochalasin B (5.0 micrograms/ml) (to disrupt microfilaments), 35 and 65% decreases in cell surface AChR number were seen after 48 h. However, in cultures treated with CBE and cytochalasin D, the same total number of AChRs was found as in cultures treated with CBE alone. No significant effects were seen with any of these drugs on the receptor incorporation rate (the appearance of new alpha-BGT-binding sites) after 6 h. The half-life for AChRs in control cultures was 23.0 h. In cytochalasin D and dihydrocytochalasin B it was 21.9 and 19.0 h, respectively; with colcemid and nocodazole, it increased to 37.1 and 28.1 h. These results suggest that non-myofibrillar microfilament bundles are not involved in the movement of AChR-containing membrane vesicles; further, the small effects seen with microtubule inhibitors tend to rule out a major role for microtubules in this transport.
微管和微丝均与有被膜泡和光滑表面膜泡的胞吐和胞吞运输有关。我们通过使用特定的药理试剂破坏这些细丝,并评估其对胚胎鸡肌管中含乙酰胆碱受体(AChR)的膜泡移动的影响,重新审视了这个问题。用诺考达唑(0.6微克/毫升)或秋水仙酰胺(0.5微克/毫升)(以破坏微管)处理的肌管培养物在48小时后细胞表面AChR的数量仅减少20 - 25%。向培养的肌管中添加鸡脑提取物(CBE)会导致细胞表面AChR的总数显著增加(通过[125I]α - 银环蛇毒素(α - BGT)结合来测量),从而为我们提供了一种操纵受体和运输泡群体的方法。用CBE加诺考达唑或秋水仙酰胺处理的培养物中AChR数量比单独药物处理增加了1.7倍,与单独用CBE处理的培养物中增加的倍数相同,尽管总数仍比对照培养物中少约20 - 25%。在用细胞松弛素D(0.2微克/毫升)或二氢细胞松弛素B(5.0微克/毫升)(以破坏微丝)处理的培养物中,48小时后细胞表面AChR数量分别减少了35%和65%。然而,在用CBE和细胞松弛素D处理的培养物中,发现AChR的总数与单独用CBE处理的培养物中的总数相同。这些药物在6小时后对受体掺入率(新的α - BGT结合位点的出现)均无显著影响。对照培养物中AChR的半衰期为23.0小时。在细胞松弛素D和二氢细胞松弛素B中,半衰期分别为21.9小时和19.0小时;在秋水仙酰胺和诺考达唑中,半衰期增加到37.1小时和28.1小时。这些结果表明,非肌原纤维微丝束不参与含AChR的膜泡的移动;此外,微管抑制剂产生的微小影响倾向于排除微管在这种运输中的主要作用。