Jensen Andrea Nedergaard, Højsted Birte Bay, Eichel Victoria, Jensen Mie Klarskov, Sørensen Torben Lykke, Kristiansen Maria
Department of Ophthalmology, Zealand University Hospital, Vestermarksvej 23, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark.
Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 23;25(1):1913. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23112-5.
Globally, 2.2 billion individuals live with visual impairment (VI). However, many cases remain undetected, particularly among older adults. Therefore, novel interventions for detection are needed. Community-based interventions (CBIs) that target people where they live provide a promising approach. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the existing literature describing potentials and barriers regarding uptake, feasibility, and effects of CBIs in detecting VI among community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 75 years.
We conducted a mixed methods systematic literature review. PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for articles with no restrictions on publication date. Studies were eligible if they reported on a CBI to detect VI among older adults aged ≥ 75 years. Two reviewers independently extracted data and appraised the quality and risk of bias of the included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A narrative meta-synthesis of the relevant evidence was conducted.
We identified 3,019 articles of which 26 of varying methodological quality were included. The VI detection methods included surveys, optometric tests, eye examinations, and self-reported visual status. Potentials and barriers regarding the uptake, feasibility, and effects of the interventions were identified at the individual, interpersonal, and community and system levels. Key potentials that may lead to successful interventions included leveraging community resources, tailoring of interventions, targeting underserved populations, high participant satisfaction, increased accessibility, and the use of tele-ophthalmology technology. Conversely, barriers that may negatively affect intervention uptake, feasibility, and effectiveness included financial constraints, poor general health, lack of eye-health awareness, poor referral systems, lack of institutional resources or access to detection technology, and technological challenges.
The synthesized results emphasize the importance of developing CBIs that target multiple levels, including the individual, interpersonal, community and system levels. Our results indicate that this may involve combining components such as eye health education, targeted strategies, use of appropriate detection methodologies, and ensuring affordability. These results may inform the development of novel CBIs to foster more effective detection of VI among older populations, improve community eye health, and reduce the burden of VI.
CRD42023468155.
全球有22亿人患有视力障碍(VI)。然而,许多病例仍未被发现,尤其是在老年人中。因此,需要新的检测干预措施。以人们居住地点为目标的社区干预措施(CBIs)提供了一种很有前景的方法。本系统评价旨在综合现有文献,描述社区居住的75岁及以上老年人中CBIs在检测VI方面的潜力和障碍,以及其可接受性、可行性和效果。
我们进行了一项混合方法的系统文献综述。在PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL、PsycInfo、Cochrane和Embase中检索文章,对发表日期无限制。如果研究报告了针对75岁及以上老年人检测VI的CBI,则符合纳入标准。两名评审员独立提取数据,并使用混合方法评估工具评估纳入研究的质量和偏倚风险。对相关证据进行了叙述性元综合分析。
我们共识别出3019篇文章,其中26篇方法学质量各异的文章被纳入。VI检测方法包括调查、验光测试、眼部检查和自我报告的视力状况。在个体、人际、社区和系统层面确定了干预措施在可接受性、可行性和效果方面的潜力和障碍。可能导致成功干预的关键潜力包括利用社区资源、量身定制干预措施、针对服务不足人群、参与者满意度高、可及性增加以及使用远程眼科技术。相反,可能对干预措施的可接受性、可行性和有效性产生负面影响的障碍包括经济限制、总体健康状况差、缺乏眼部健康意识、转诊系统不完善、缺乏机构资源或无法获得检测技术以及技术挑战。
综合结果强调了开发针对多个层面(包括个体、人际、社区和系统层面)的CBIs的重要性。我们的结果表明,这可能涉及结合眼部健康教育、针对性策略、使用适当的检测方法以及确保可负担性等要素。这些结果可为开发新的CBIs提供参考,以促进在老年人群中更有效地检测VI,改善社区眼部健康,并减轻VI的负担。
CRD42023468155。