• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿根廷法律改革后扩大安全的门诊手动真空吸引术堕胎服务至孕14 + 6周:公共卫生部门的一项观察性研究

Expanding access to safe ambulatory manual vacuum aspiration abortion up to 14+6 weeks following Argentina's legal reform: an observational study in the public health sector.

作者信息

Saavedra-Avendano Biani, Botta María Paula, Chaumet Dolores, Macagno Berenice, Ortiz-Avendano Guillermo Antonio

机构信息

Ipas LAC, Mexico City, Mexico.

CEMAR, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.

出版信息

Reprod Health. 2025 May 24;22(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02036-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12978-025-02036-8
PMID:40410790
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12102811/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In December 2020, Argentina passed Law 27.610, legalizing elective abortion up to 14 + 6 weeks and beyond in cases of rape or health risks. This study aims to analyze the sociodemographic characteristics of users who opted or were referred for manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) services at an a ambulatory medical center in Argentina before and after the legal reform, and to assess the safety and effectiveness of outpatient MVA procedures for pregnancies up to 14 + 6 weeks.

METHODS

Observational study using clinical data from patients up to 14 + 6 weeks gestation (n = 1,861) who sought or were referred for outpatient MVA abortion at a public healthcare facility in Rosario, Argentina (2017-2023). We analyze changes in users' sociodemographic characteristics before and after the legal reform and assess the safety and effectiveness of ambulatory MVA abortion by gestational age (< 13 weeks vs. 13-14 weeks). A logistic regression tested associations between sociodemographic, procedural, and reproductive factors, and receiving MVA after 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Of the 1,861 MVA abortions, 85% (n = 1,590) were provided before 13 weeks' gestation, and 15% (n = 271) occurred between 13-14 weeks. After the legal reform, more users accessed outpatient MVA services beyond 12 weeks (7% vs. 22%; p < 0.05: before and after the legal change, respectively), including individuals with lower education levels (46% vs. 54%; p < 0.05:), informal employment (34% vs. 47%; p < 0.05), without healthcare insurance (72% vs. 90%; p < 0.05), and nulliparity (18% vs. 30%; p < 0.05). The success rate of ambulatory MVA abortion was 99.9%, with 0.4% (n = 7) adverse events; no statistically significant differences by gestational age groups (< 13 weeks vs. 13-14 weeks). The legal reform was positively associated with accessing MVA abortion after 12 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The legal reform improved access to safe ambulatory MVA abortion services up to 14 + 6 weeks' gestation, particularly for socially disadvantaged users. MVA abortion, both before 13 weeks and at 13-14 weeks, demonstrated a high success rate (99.9%) with minimal adverse events.

摘要

背景

2020年12月,阿根廷通过了第27.610号法律,将妊娠14 + 6周以内的选择性堕胎合法化,强奸或存在健康风险的情况不受此孕周限制。本研究旨在分析阿根廷一项法律改革前后,在一家门诊医疗中心选择或被转诊接受手动真空吸引术(MVA)服务的使用者的社会人口学特征,并评估门诊MVA手术对妊娠14 + 6周以内的安全性和有效性。

方法

采用观察性研究,使用来自阿根廷罗萨里奥一家公共医疗机构中妊娠14 + 6周以内(n = 1861)寻求或被转诊接受门诊MVA堕胎的患者的临床数据。我们分析了法律改革前后使用者社会人口学特征的变化,并按孕周(<13周与13 - 14周)评估门诊MVA堕胎的安全性和有效性。通过逻辑回归检验社会人口学、手术和生殖因素与12周后接受MVA之间的关联。

结果

在1861例MVA堕胎中,85%(n = 1590)在妊娠13周前进行,15%(n = 271)发生在13 - 14周之间。法律改革后,更多使用者在12周后接受门诊MVA服务(分别为7%和22%;p < 0.05:法律变更前后),包括教育程度较低者(46%对54%;p < 0.05)、非正规就业者(34%对47%;p < 0.05)、没有医疗保险者(72%对90%;p < 0.05)以及未生育者(18%对30%;p < 0.05)。门诊MVA堕胎的成功率为99.9%,不良事件发生率为0.4%(n = 7);不同孕周组(<13周与13 - 14周)之间无统计学显著差异。法律改革与12周后接受MVA堕胎呈正相关。

结论

法律改革改善了妊娠14 + 6周以内安全的门诊MVA堕胎服务的可及性,特别是对社会弱势群体而言。妊娠13周前和13 - 14周的MVA堕胎均显示出高成功率(99.9%)且不良事件极少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04a7/12102811/f8978a52d768/12978_2025_2036_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04a7/12102811/f8978a52d768/12978_2025_2036_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04a7/12102811/f8978a52d768/12978_2025_2036_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Expanding access to safe ambulatory manual vacuum aspiration abortion up to 14+6 weeks following Argentina's legal reform: an observational study in the public health sector.阿根廷法律改革后扩大安全的门诊手动真空吸引术堕胎服务至孕14 + 6周:公共卫生部门的一项观察性研究
Reprod Health. 2025 May 24;22(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02036-8.
2
Abortion beyond 13 weeks in Argentina: healthcare seeking experiences during self-managed abortion accompanied by the Socorristas en Red.阿根廷 13 周以上的堕胎:由 Red 援助者陪伴的自我管理堕胎期间的医疗保健寻求经历。
Reprod Health. 2022 Aug 26;19(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01488-6.
3
Legal but limited? Abortion service availability and readiness assessment in Nepal.合法但有限?尼泊尔的堕胎服务提供和准备情况评估。
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Jan 1;33(1):99-106. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx149.
4
Twelve years after abortion decriminalization in Mexico City: Can we still remain an island of liberties?墨西哥城堕胎非刑罪化 12 年后:我们还能继续保持自由的孤岛吗?
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jan;62:63-78. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
5
"Right tool," wrong "job": Manual vacuum aspiration, post-abortion care and transnational population politics in Senegal.“工具正确”,“工作”有误:塞内加尔的人工流产负压吸引术、流产后护理与跨国人口政治
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jun;135:56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.030. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
6
Management of incomplete abortion with manual vacuum aspiration in comparison to sharp metallic curette in an Ethiopian setting.在埃塞俄比亚的环境中,与锐性金属刮匙相比,采用手动真空吸引术处理不全流产的情况。
East Afr Med J. 1996 Sep;73(9):598-603.
7
Comparison of procedure time between manual and electric vacuum aspiration for pregnancy termination between 10-14 weeks: A randomized trial.孕10 - 14周时人工流产与电动负压吸引术手术时间的比较:一项随机试验。
Contraception. 2022 Sep;113:108-112. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.03.025. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
8
Abortion Provision and Delays to Care in a Clinic Network in Washington State After Dobbs.《多布斯案后华盛顿州诊所网络中的堕胎服务提供情况和护理延迟》
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2413847. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13847.
9
Impact of legislative change on waiting time for women accessing surgical abortion services in a rural hospital in the Northern Territory.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jun;60(3):459-464. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13117. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
10
Medical abortion and manual vacuum aspiration for legal abortion protect women's health and reduce costs to the health system: findings from Colombia.哥伦比亚的研究结果表明,药物流产和人工负压吸引术用于合法堕胎可保护女性健康并降低卫生系统成本。
Reprod Health Matters. 2015 Feb;22(44 Suppl 1):125-33. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(14)43788-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Can mid-level providers manage medical abortion after 12 weeks' gestation as safely and effectively as physicians? A non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.中级医疗提供者能否在 12 周妊娠后安全有效地进行药物流产?在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴进行的一项非劣效性随机对照试验。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Jun;165(3):1268-1276. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15392. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
2
Multicountry research on comprehensive abortion policy implementation in Latin America: a mixed-methods study protocol.多国研究:拉丁美洲综合堕胎政策实施情况——一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 19;14(1):e073617. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073617.
3
Barriers and delays in access to abortion care: a cross-sectional study of people traveling to obtain care in England and the Netherlands from European countries where abortion is legal on broad grounds.
获取堕胎护理的障碍和延迟:一项横断面研究,研究对象为从广泛允许堕胎的欧洲国家前往英格兰和荷兰获取堕胎护理的人。
Reprod Health. 2024 Jan 15;21(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01729-2.
4
The WHO abortion care guideline: Law and policy-Past, present, and future.世卫组织堕胎护理指南:法律与政策——过去、现在与未来。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Sep;162(3):1119-1124. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15017. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
5
Characterizing two models for abortion care in Argentina pre-Law 27.610: 2016-2019.在阿根廷《2016-2019 年堕胎法》出台之前,对两种堕胎护理模式进行描述。
Rev Saude Publica. 2023 Jul 7;57:36. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004993. eCollection 2023.
6
Effect of Paracervical Block Volume on Pain Control for Dilation and Aspiration: A Randomized Controlled Trial.宫颈旁阻滞容量对扩张和吸宫术疼痛控制的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug 1;140(2):234-242. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004862. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
7
Abortion Legalization in Uruguay: Effects on Adolescent Fertility.乌拉圭的堕胎合法化:对青少年生育率的影响。
Stud Fam Plann. 2022 Sep;53(3):491-514. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12204. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
8
Abortion at 12 or more weeks' gestation and travel for later abortion care among Mississippi residents.密西西比州妊娠 12 周及以上的堕胎和随后堕胎护理的出行情况。
Contraception. 2022 Apr;108:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
9
Abortion Care Beyond 13 Weeks' Gestation: A Global Perspective.妊娠 13 周以上的流产护理:全球视角。
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep 1;64(3):460-474. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000631.
10
Impact of abortion law reforms on health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.中低收入国家堕胎法律改革对卫生服务和健康结果的影响:系统评价。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Oct 12;36(9):1483-1498. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab069.