Berg Inger Jorid, Kristianslund Eirik K, Tveter Anne Therese, Sexton Joseph, Bakland Gunnstein, Gossec Laure, Hakim Sarah, Macfarlane Gary J, Moholt Ellen, Provan Sella Aarrestad, Thomassen Emil E Kvernberg, de Thurah Annette, Haavardsholm Espen A, Lillegraven Siri, Osteras Nina
Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2025 Jul;84(7):1140-1150. doi: 10.1016/j.ard.2025.04.019. Epub 2025 May 23.
This study aimed to determine whether novel follow-up regimen, remote monitoring, or patient-initiated care is noninferior to usual care in maintaining low disease activity, in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).
This is a randomised, controlled, 3-armed, parallel-group, open-label, noninferiority trial. Patients with axSpA in low disease activity on stable treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor were recruited from a Norwegian outpatient clinic. Patients were randomly allocated 1:1:1 to remote monitoring, patient-initiated care, or usual care (control group), with 18 months of follow-up. Primary outcome was mean probability of axSpA Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) of <2.1, compared between groups at 6, 12, and 18 months, with 15% noninferiority margin. Secondary outcomes included other measures of disease activity, physical function, patient satisfaction, change of medication, resource use, and adverse events.
Of 243 patients enrolled patients, 235 completed the study (remote monitoring = 75, patient-initiated care = 79, usual care = 81). At the 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month assessments, 90% or more patients in all 3 groups had ASDAS of <2.1. The estimated difference of probability of ASDAS < 2.1 was as follows: usual care vs remote monitoring, -4.1% (97.5% CI, -9.9% to 1.8%); usual care vs patient-initiated care, -1.1% (97.5% CI, -7.2% to 4.9%); and remote monitoring vs patient-initiated care, 2.9% (95% CI, -1.5% to 7.4%). Health providers' resource use was lowest in patient-initiated care; other secondary outcomes were comparable.
In patients with axSpA in low disease activity and on stable treatment with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor, follow-up with remote monitoring or patient-initiated care was noninferior to usual care in maintaining low disease activity, supporting the implementation of novel follow-up strategies.
本研究旨在确定对于轴性脊柱关节炎(axSpA)患者,新型随访方案、远程监测或患者自主发起的护理在维持低疾病活动度方面是否不劣于常规护理。
这是一项随机、对照、三臂、平行组、开放标签的非劣效性试验。从挪威一家门诊诊所招募了在肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂稳定治疗下处于低疾病活动度的axSpA患者。患者按1:1:1随机分配至远程监测组、患者自主发起的护理组或常规护理组(对照组),随访18个月。主要结局是在6个月、12个月和18个月时,比较各组中轴性脊柱关节炎疾病活动度评分(ASDAS)<2.1的平均概率,非劣效性边际为15%。次要结局包括疾病活动度的其他指标、身体功能、患者满意度、药物变化、资源利用和不良事件。
在243名入组患者中,235名完成了研究(远程监测组 = 75名,患者自主发起的护理组 = 79名,常规护理组 = 81名)。在6个月、12个月和18个月的评估中,所有3组中90%或更多的患者ASDAS<2.1。ASDAS<2.1的概率估计差异如下:常规护理组与远程监测组,-4.1%(97.5%CI,-9.9%至1.8%);常规护理组与患者自主发起的护理组,-1.1%(97.5%CI,-7.2%至4.9%);远程监测组与患者自主发起的护理组,2.9%(95%CI,-1.5%至7.4%)。患者自主发起的护理组中医疗服务提供者的资源利用最低;其他次要结局相当。
对于处于低疾病活动度且在肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂稳定治疗下的axSpA患者,远程监测或患者自主发起的护理随访在维持低疾病活动度方面不劣于常规护理,支持实施新型随访策略。