• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钛种植体与氧化锆种植体中基台螺丝松动情况的比较:一项体外研究

Comparison of Abutment Screw Loosening in Titanium Versus Zirconia Implants: An In Vitro Study.

作者信息

Fathi Amirhossein, Ebadian Behnaz, Arab Shekoufeh, Salehi Sepideh, Atash Ramin

出版信息

J Oral Implantol. 2025 Aug 8;51(4):321-325. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00035.

DOI:10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00035
PMID:40415511
Abstract

Abutment screw loosening is a common complication in implant-based prostheses. Given the importance of esthetics in anterior regions, zirconia implants and abutments have been introduced. This study aims to compare the extent of abutment screw loosening between zirconia and titanium implants to determine the best treatment option. This in vitro study assessed abutment screw loosening in titanium and zirconia implants. Ten zirconia dental implant fixtures (10 mm in length, 4.3 mm in diameter) with 10 zirconia abutments and titanium screws were allocated in one group, and 10 titanium implant fixtures of the same dimensions with 10 titanium abutments and titanium screws were allocated to the other group. The abutment screws were tightened to a torque of 35 N/cm using a torque meter and placed in resin blocks. The center of the resin block then underwent a compressive force of 75 N and 12 400 cycles and a frequency of 75 cycles per minute. Furthermore, the removal torque value of each screw was measured. The data on screw loosening forces were analyzed and compared using a t test with a significance level set at 0.05. The average removal torque for titanium implants was 21.53 N/cm, whereas for zirconia implants, it was 18.46 N/cm. A t test comparison showed that titanium implants had a significantly higher removal torque value than zirconia implants (p < .001). In laboratory conditions, titanium implants exhibit significantly higher removal torque values than zirconia implants, suggesting they may offer better stability in similar clinical settings.

摘要

基台螺丝松动是种植体支持式修复体常见的并发症。鉴于美学在前牙区的重要性,氧化锆种植体和基台应运而生。本研究旨在比较氧化锆种植体和钛种植体之间基台螺丝松动的程度,以确定最佳治疗方案。这项体外研究评估了钛种植体和氧化锆种植体的基台螺丝松动情况。将10个长度为10mm、直径为4.3mm的氧化锆牙种植体固定装置与10个氧化锆基台和钛螺丝分为一组,将10个相同尺寸的钛种植体固定装置与10个钛基台和钛螺丝分为另一组。使用扭矩计将基台螺丝拧紧至35N/cm的扭矩,然后放置在树脂块中。树脂块的中心随后承受75N的压缩力和12400次循环,频率为每分钟75次。此外,测量每个螺丝的拆除扭矩值。使用t检验对螺丝松动力的数据进行分析和比较,显著性水平设定为0.05。钛种植体的平均拆除扭矩为21.53N/cm,而氧化锆种植体的平均拆除扭矩为18.46N/cm。t检验比较显示,钛种植体的拆除扭矩值显著高于氧化锆种植体(p<0.001)。在实验室条件下,钛种植体的拆除扭矩值显著高于氧化锆种植体,这表明在类似的临床环境中,钛种植体可能具有更好的稳定性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Abutment Screw Loosening in Titanium Versus Zirconia Implants: An In Vitro Study.钛种植体与氧化锆种植体中基台螺丝松动情况的比较:一项体外研究
J Oral Implantol. 2025 Aug 8;51(4):321-325. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00035.
2
Effect of Thermodynamic Cyclic Loading on Screw Loosening of Tightened Versus New Abutment Screw in Bone Level and Tissue Level Implants in DIO Implant Company (In-Vitro Study).热力学循环加载对DIO种植体公司骨水平和软组织水平种植体中拧紧的与新的基台螺钉松动的影响(体外研究)
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70162. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70162.
3
The Performance of PEKK vs Zirconia Abutments for Screw-Retained Crowns in Two-Piece Zirconia Implants: An in vitro Study.两件式氧化锆种植体中聚醚酮酮(PEKK)与氧化锆基台用于螺丝固位冠的性能:一项体外研究
J Oral Implantol. 2025 Aug 8;51(4):370-375. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00014.
4
Torque Loss in Abutment Screw: Impacts of Type and Angle of Abutments.基台螺丝的扭矩损失:基台类型和角度的影响
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2025;35(3):53-62. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2025055792.
5
Titanium-Zirconia abutment-implant assemblies: Are they alternatives for single material implants?钛锆基台-种植体组件:它们是单一材料种植体的替代品吗?
Dent Mater. 2025 Aug;41(8):914-925. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2025.05.007. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
6
A Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating 3-Year Survival Rates and Technical Complications of Screw-Retained Hybrid Abutment Crowns on Two-Piece Zirconia and Titanium Implants.一项评估两件式氧化锆和钛种植体上螺丝固位混合基台冠3年生存率和技术并发症的随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Aug;36(8):965-977. doi: 10.1111/clr.14443. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
7
Influence of implant internal thread deformation and repair on screw torque maintenance: An in vitro study.种植体内螺纹变形与修复对螺钉扭矩维持的影响:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Aug;134(2):434.e1-434.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.04.033. Epub 2025 May 9.
8
Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review.基台/修复体的内连接与外连接:系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:202-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02556.x.
9
Load-bearing capacity of screw-retained fixed dental prostheses made of monolithic zirconia on different abutment designs and abutment-free implant connection.不同基台设计和无基台种植体连接方式的整体式氧化锆螺丝固位固定义齿的承载能力
J Dent. 2025 Feb;153:105561. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105561. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
10
Mechanical behavior of titanium and zirconia abutments at the implant-abutment interface: A systematic review.钛和氧化锆基台在种植体-基台界面的力学行为:系统评价。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Mar;131(3):420-426. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Mar 12.