• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神疾病中的甲基化风险评分:推进心理健康领域的表观遗传学研究

Methylation Risk Scores in Psychiatric Disorders: Advancing Epigenetic Research in Mental Health.

作者信息

Ohi Kazutaka, Fujikane Daisuke, Takai Kentaro, Kuramitsu Ayumi, Muto Yukimasa, Sugiyama Shunsuke, Shioiri Toshiki

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.

出版信息

JMA J. 2025 Apr 28;8(2):363-370. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0329. Epub 2025 Feb 28.

DOI:10.31662/jmaj.2024-0329
PMID:40416010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12095519/
Abstract

DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification implicated in psychiatric disorders influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Methylation risk scores (MRSs) have emerged as a tool for quantifying accumulated epigenetic modifications and assessing the predisposed risk for certain common disorders. This narrative review introduces the MRS application in psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BD), social anxiety disorder (SAD), and panic disorder (PD), while also discussing the current limitations and ethical considerations in psychiatric research. MRSs are calculated from epigenome-wide association studies (EWASs) for psychiatric disorders in various tissues from blood and brain and reflect methylation patterns associated with the psychiatric disorder risk. MRSs provide a perspective of how the cumulative methylation patterns at specific CpG sites may contribute to the onset of psychiatric disorders. In SCZ and BD, MRSs derived from both blood and brain tissues have shown distinct methylation profiles that differentiate these disorders, particularly in patients with a high genetic SCZ risk. MRSs are also used to assess the impact of environmental factors, such as early-life adversity and chronic stress, on psychiatric outcomes. In SAD and PD, where epigenetic studies are relatively limited, MRSs revealed both shared and distinct epigenetic features between anxiety disorders, with specific methylation changes associated with social avoidance in SAD patients. MRSs can serve as biomarkers, providing a valuable understanding of both genetic predispositions and environmental influences on gene regulation. However, the lack of large-scale EWAS datasets and standardized summary statistics remains as a limitation. To address this issue, this review provides a list of publicly available raw intensity data (IDAT) files from psychiatric epigenetic studies that can help facilitate future research by providing the raw data necessary for conducting independent EWASs and MRS calculations. As the field advances, careful consideration must be given to the ethical implications of MRS applications, particularly in clinical intervention and prevention. While MRSs hold promise for future personalized medicine applications, informing treatment decisions based on an individual's methylation profile, caution is warranted regarding their predictive utility and effect size limitations. This review emphasizes the importance of MRSs in advancing psychiatric research, bridging the gap between genetic risk and environmental factors.

摘要

DNA甲基化是一种表观遗传修饰,与受遗传和环境因素影响的精神疾病有关。甲基化风险评分(MRS)已成为一种量化累积表观遗传修饰和评估某些常见疾病易患风险的工具。这篇叙述性综述介绍了MRS在精神疾病中的应用,包括精神分裂症(SCZ)、双相情感障碍(BD)、社交焦虑障碍(SAD)和惊恐障碍(PD),同时也讨论了精神疾病研究中当前的局限性和伦理考量。MRS是根据来自血液和大脑等各种组织的精神疾病的全表观基因组关联研究(EWAS)计算得出的,反映了与精神疾病风险相关的甲基化模式。MRS提供了一个视角,即特定CpG位点的累积甲基化模式如何可能导致精神疾病的发作。在SCZ和BD中,来自血液和脑组织的MRS显示出不同的甲基化谱,这些谱可以区分这些疾病,特别是在具有高遗传SCZ风险的患者中。MRS还用于评估环境因素,如早期生活逆境和慢性应激,对精神疾病结局的影响。在表观遗传学研究相对有限的SAD和PD中,MRS揭示了焦虑症之间既有共同的也有不同的表观遗传特征,SAD患者中特定的甲基化变化与社交回避有关。MRS可以作为生物标志物,有助于深入了解遗传易感性和环境对基因调控的影响。然而缺乏大规模的EWAS数据集和标准化的汇总统计数据仍然是一个限制。为了解决这个问题,本综述提供了一份来自精神疾病表观遗传学研究的公开可用原始强度数据(IDAT)文件列表,通过提供进行独立EWAS和MRS计算所需的原始数据,有助于推动未来的研究。随着该领域的发展,必须仔细考虑MRS应用的伦理影响,特别是在临床干预和预防方面。虽然MRS有望用于未来的个性化医疗应用,根据个体的甲基化谱为治疗决策提供信息,但对于它们的预测效用和效应大小限制仍需谨慎对待。本综述强调了MRS在推进精神疾病研究、弥合遗传风险和环境因素之间差距方面的重要性。

相似文献

1
Methylation Risk Scores in Psychiatric Disorders: Advancing Epigenetic Research in Mental Health.精神疾病中的甲基化风险评分:推进心理健康领域的表观遗传学研究
JMA J. 2025 Apr 28;8(2):363-370. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2024-0329. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
2
Epigenetic signatures of social anxiety, panic disorders and stress experiences: Insights from genome-wide DNA methylation risk scores.社会焦虑、恐慌障碍和压力体验的表观遗传特征:全基因组 DNA 甲基化风险评分的见解。
Psychiatry Res. 2024 Jul;337:115984. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115984. Epub 2024 May 27.
3
Genome-wide DNA methylation risk scores for schizophrenia derived from blood and brain tissues further explain the genetic risk in patients stratified by polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.全基因组 DNA 甲基化风险评分可用于精神分裂症,来源于血液和脑组织,进一步解释了按精神分裂症和双相情感障碍多基因风险评分分层的患者的遗传风险。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Jan 11;27(1):e300936. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300936.
4
[Epigenetics' implication in autism spectrum disorders: A review].[表观遗传学在自闭症谱系障碍中的影响:综述]
Encephale. 2017 Aug;43(4):374-381. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
Novel Subgroups of Type 2 Diabetes Display Different Epigenetic Patterns That Associate With Future Diabetic Complications.2 型糖尿病的新型亚组表现出不同的表观遗传模式,这些模式与未来的糖尿病并发症相关。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jul 7;45(7):1621-1630. doi: 10.2337/dc21-2489.
6
Psychiatric Polygenic Risk Scores Across Youth With Bipolar Disorder, Youth at High Risk for Bipolar Disorder, and Controls.双相情感障碍青少年、双相情感障碍高危青少年及对照组的精神科多基因风险评分
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Nov;63(11):1149-1157. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2023.12.009. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
7
Alteration of DNA Methylation and Epigenetic Scores Associated With Features of Schizophrenia and Common Variant Genetic Risk.与精神分裂症特征和常见变异遗传风险相关的 DNA 甲基化和表观遗传评分的改变。
Biol Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 1;95(7):647-661. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.07.010. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
8
Epigenome-wide association study of DNA methylation in panic disorder.惊恐障碍中DNA甲基化的全表观基因组关联研究。
Clin Epigenetics. 2017 Jan 21;9:6. doi: 10.1186/s13148-016-0307-1. eCollection 2017.
9
DNA methylation differences associated with social anxiety disorder and early life adversity.与社交焦虑障碍和早期生活逆境相关的 DNA 甲基化差异。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):104. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01225-w.
10
Epigenetic alterations of the dopaminergic system in major psychiatric disorders.主要精神疾病中多巴胺能系统的表观遗传改变。
Methods Mol Biol. 2008;448:187-212. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-205-2_9.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic overlap between schizophrenia spectrum disorders and Alzheimer's disease: Current evidence and future directions - An integrative review.精神分裂症谱系障碍与阿尔茨海默病的遗传重叠:当前证据与未来方向——综合述评。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Dec;167:105900. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105900. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
2
Associations of polygenic risk scores differentiating attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder from autism spectrum disorder with cognitive and cortical alterations in Schizophrenia patients.区分注意力缺陷多动障碍与自闭症谱系障碍的多基因风险评分与精神分裂症患者认知和皮层改变的关联。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;34(3):1149-1159. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02549-w. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
3
Epigenetic signatures of social anxiety, panic disorders and stress experiences: Insights from genome-wide DNA methylation risk scores.社会焦虑、恐慌障碍和压力体验的表观遗传特征:全基因组 DNA 甲基化风险评分的见解。
Psychiatry Res. 2024 Jul;337:115984. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115984. Epub 2024 May 27.
4
Genome-wide DNA methylation risk scores for schizophrenia derived from blood and brain tissues further explain the genetic risk in patients stratified by polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.全基因组 DNA 甲基化风险评分可用于精神分裂症,来源于血液和脑组织,进一步解释了按精神分裂症和双相情感障碍多基因风险评分分层的患者的遗传风险。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Jan 11;27(1):e300936. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300936.
5
Association of psychological distress and DNA methylation: A 5-year longitudinal population-based twin study.心理困扰与 DNA 甲基化的关联:一项基于人群的双胞胎 5 年纵向研究。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Jan;78(1):51-59. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13606. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
6
Pruning and thresholding approach for methylation risk scores in multi-ancestry populations.多血统人群中甲基化风险评分的修剪和阈值方法。
Epigenetics. 2023 Dec;18(1):2187172. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2023.2187172.
7
Higher polygenic risk scores for anxiety disorders are associated with reduced area in the anterior cingulate gyrus.焦虑障碍的多基因风险评分较高与前扣带回 gyrus 面积减小有关。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Jan 1;320:291-297. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.041. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
8
Cognitive performances across individuals at high genetic risk for schizophrenia, high genetic risk for bipolar disorder, and low genetic risks: a combined polygenic risk score approach.精神分裂症高遗传风险个体、双相情感障碍高遗传风险个体和低遗传风险个体的认知表现:联合多基因风险评分方法。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jul;53(10):4454-4463. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722001271. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
9
Perceptions of and subjective difficulties with social cognition in schizophrenia from an internet survey: Knowledge, clinical experiences, and awareness of association with social functioning.从互联网调查中了解精神分裂症患者对社会认知的看法和主观困难:知识、临床经验以及对与社会功能相关联的认识。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Sep;76(9):429-436. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13435. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
10
Effects of stressful life-events on DNA methylation in panic disorder and major depressive disorder.应激性生活事件对惊恐障碍和重性抑郁障碍中 DNA 甲基化的影响。
Clin Epigenetics. 2022 Apr 27;14(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13148-022-01274-y.