Abu Shajahan Maheen, Mohideen Bilal, P A Jeena, Thaha Swaliha M, Ashraf Abdul Rahman, Nazar Ijaz, Nair Rocky G, Fakhrudeen Mushthak Syedali, Suresh Adhyashree L
Emergency Medicine, PRS Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram, IND.
Medicine and Surgery, Al-Ameen Medical College, Vijayapura, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Apr 23;17(4):e82846. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82846. eCollection 2025 Apr.
Introduction Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is linked to an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), with malignant ventricular arrhythmias, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF), complicating STEMI (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) cases and accounting for a significant proportion of in-hospital SCDs. While advanced risk stratification techniques such as the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) score depend on laboratory biomarkers and complex algorithms, their need for specialized equipment limits widespread use. Corrected QT (QTc) dispersion (QTd), the difference between the longest and shortest QT intervals on a 12-lead ECG, provides a simple alternative for assessing ventricular repolarization heterogeneity and predicting arrhythmic risk in AMI patients. Previous studies have assessed QTd in AMI populations, reporting associations with ventricular arrhythmias and mortality. However, the definition and measurement of QTd are subject to variability, with controversies surrounding manual versus automated measurement, correction formulas, and ECG lead selection, resulting in reported inter- and intra-observer variability. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted in an emergency and cardiac care setting, enrolling patients diagnosed with STEMI who underwent reperfusion therapy. Demographic data, clinical presentation, and medical history were recorded. Serial 12-lead ECGs were obtained at three time points: admission, post-reperfusion, and 24 hours later. QT intervals were measured manually using calipers, and the QTc interval was calculated using Bazett's formula. QTd was calculated as the difference between maximum and minimum QTc values across the ECG leads. To assess inter-observer variability, a randomly selected subset of ECGs was re-measured by a second cardiologist, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to quantify agreement. Data analysis was performed using statistical software. Results The study population had a mean age of approximately 61 years, with a majority being male. QTd was significantly elevated in anterior wall myocardial infarction (AWMI) patients, with mean QTd values of 98.96 ± 2.95 ms at admission compared to 85.08 ± 17.02 ms in non-AWMI patients (p < 0.0001), particularly at admission and post-reperfusion. Inferior wall myocardial infarction (IWMI) patients exhibited an initial increase in QTd, which significantly reduced after reperfusion. Posterior wall myocardial infarction (PWMI) patients showed consistently lower QTd across all time points. While this was interpreted as correlating with fewer arrhythmic events, the study did not present actual data on arrhythmia frequency by infarct location. This lack of direct event correlation limits the strength of QTd as a prognostic marker. No significant variations were observed based on comorbidities. Conclusion QTd serves as a useful prognostic marker in AMI. Elevated QTd at admission is linked to a higher arrhythmic risk, particularly in AWMI. A reduction in QTd post-reperfusion supports its potential role in assessing therapeutic effectiveness. Routine QTd measurement may enhance risk stratification and inform clinical decision-making in AMI patients.
引言
急性心肌梗死(AMI)与心脏性猝死(SCD)风险增加相关,恶性室性心律失常、持续性室性心动过速(VT)和心室颤动(VF)使ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)病例复杂化,并占院内SCD的很大比例。虽然诸如GRACE(急性冠状动脉事件全球注册)评分等先进的风险分层技术依赖于实验室生物标志物和复杂算法,但其对专业设备的需求限制了其广泛应用。校正QT(QTc)离散度(QTd),即12导联心电图上最长和最短QT间期的差值,为评估AMI患者的心室复极异质性和预测心律失常风险提供了一种简单的替代方法。先前的研究评估了AMI人群中的QTd,报告了其与室性心律失常和死亡率的关联。然而,QTd的定义和测量存在变异性,围绕手动测量与自动测量、校正公式以及心电图导联选择存在争议,导致观察者间和观察者内的变异性报告不一。
方法
在急诊和心脏护理环境中进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究,纳入诊断为STEMI并接受再灌注治疗的患者。记录人口统计学数据、临床表现和病史。在三个时间点获取系列12导联心电图:入院时、再灌注后和24小时后。使用卡尺手动测量QT间期,并使用Bazett公式计算QTc间期。QTd计算为心电图各导联最大和最小QTc值之间的差值。为评估观察者间的变异性,由第二位心脏病专家对随机选择的一部分心电图进行重新测量,并使用组内相关系数(ICC)来量化一致性。使用统计软件进行数据分析。
结果
研究人群的平均年龄约为61岁,大多数为男性。前壁心肌梗死(AWMI)患者的QTd显著升高,入院时平均QTd值为98.96±2.95毫秒,而非AWMI患者为85.08±17.02毫秒(p<0.0001),尤其是在入院时和再灌注后。下壁心肌梗死(IWMI)患者的QTd最初升高,再灌注后显著降低。后壁心肌梗死(PWMI)患者在所有时间点的QTd始终较低。虽然这被解释为与心律失常事件较少相关,但该研究未提供按梗死部位划分的心律失常频率的实际数据。这种缺乏直接事件相关性限制了QTd作为预后标志物的强度。基于合并症未观察到显著差异。
结论
QTd在AMI中是一种有用的预后标志物。入院时QTd升高与更高的心律失常风险相关,尤其是在AWMI中。再灌注后QTd降低支持其在评估治疗效果方面的潜在作用。常规测量QTd可能会加强AMI患者的风险分层并为临床决策提供依据。