Shui Michelle L, Armstrong Weronika, Altendahl Marie, Shanks Anthony, Sims Shireen M, Ratan Rini B, Saab Said S
is a Medical Student, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
is Clerkship Director, Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN), and an Assistant Professor of Clinical OB/GYN, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Apr;17(2):189-195. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00660.1. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
Despite existing guidelines for writing clerkship summative assessment narratives, their quality, structure, and utility remain variable. Categorizing Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) narratives using a framework can reveal patterns and gaps in content, offering actionable insights. This study aimed to (1) categorize MSPE narrative comments using the PRIME+ framework (professionalism, reporting, interpreting, managing, and educating, and areas for improvement [+]), and (2) examine differences in length and content by gender, race, origin of medical school, and final clerkship grade. Seven hundred twenty applications to our obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residency program in 2023 were reviewed, focusing on the OB/GYN core clerkship narrative. Narratives were categorized using the PRIME+ framework, and differences in length and content were assessed by gender, race, origin of medical school, and final grade. Differences between groups were evaluated with nonparametric tests. Six hundred fifty-three narratives from 231 medical schools were included. Fifty-one unique grading systems were reported. PRIME+ domains were represented as follows: professionalism (94.8%, 619 of 653), reporter (71.1%, 464 of 653), interpreter (37.5%, 245 of 653), manager (69.1%, 451 of 653), educator (69.7%, 455 of 653), and areas for improvement (3.7%, 24 of 653). For each domain, <13% of narratives included ≥1 specific example. Median word count differed between US-based (155 words; 95% CI, 148-162) and international (61 words; 95% CI, 51-75) applicants (=.001). Students earning "honors" had longer narratives (median words 149; 95% CI, 131-164 vs 117; 95% CI, 97-134; =.001) with more specific examples (1.2 examples; 95% CI, 0.97-1.4 vs 0.88; 95% CI, 0.53-1.2; =.024) and advanced PRIME+ domains, specifically educator (=.016). The number of specific examples differed by race (=.02) but not gender. MSPE narratives for the OB/GYN clerkship demonstrate variability in content and length.
尽管存在关于撰写临床实习总结性评估叙述的指南,但其质量、结构和实用性仍存在差异。使用一个框架对医学生表现评估(MSPE)叙述进行分类,可以揭示内容中的模式和差距,提供可采取行动的见解。本研究旨在:(1)使用PRIME+框架(专业精神、报告、解释、管理、教育以及改进领域[+])对MSPE叙述性评论进行分类;(2)研究性别、种族、医学院校来源和最终临床实习成绩在长度和内容上的差异。对2023年我们妇产科住院医师项目的720份申请进行了审查,重点关注妇产科核心临床实习叙述。使用PRIME+框架对叙述进行分类,并评估性别、种族、医学院校来源和最终成绩在长度和内容上的差异。使用非参数检验评估组间差异。纳入了来自231所医学院校的653份叙述。报告了51种独特的评分系统。PRIME+领域的表现如下:专业精神(94.8%,653份中的619份)、报告者(71.1%,653份中的464份)、解释者(37.5%,653份中的245份)、管理者(69.1%,653份中的451份)、教育者(69.7%,653份中的455份)以及改进领域(3.7%,653份中的24份)。对于每个领域,<13%的叙述包含≥1个具体例子。美国本土申请者(155个单词;95%CI,148 - 162)和国际申请者(第61个单词;95%CI,51 - 75)的中位数单词数存在差异(P =.001)。获得“荣誉”的学生叙述更长(中位数单词数149;95%CI,131 - 164对117;95%CI,97 - 134;P =.001),有更多具体例子(1.2个例子;95%CI,0.97 - 1.4对0.88;95%CI,0.53 - 1.2;P =.024)以及更高级的PRIME+领域,特别是教育者领域(P =.016)。具体例子的数量因种族而异(P =.02),但不因性别而异。妇产科临床实习的MSPE叙述在内容和长度上存在差异。