Suppr超能文献

2022年和2023年提交排名顺序表的申请人与匹配成功的申请人之间的人口统计学差异。

Demographic Differences Between Applicants Who Submitted Rank Order Lists and Applicants Who Matched in 2022 and 2023.

作者信息

Chen Jenny X, Deng Francis

机构信息

is an Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

is an Assistant Professor, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Apr;17(2):196-203. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00512.1. Epub 2025 Apr 15.

Abstract

Resident selection processes may alter the representation of applicants with certain demographic characteristics. The impact of potential biases at each phase of selection should be examined. To investigate the differences between applicants who submit rank order lists (ROLs) and applicants who match in the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Main Residency Match. We analyzed publicly available NRMP data for the 2022 and 2023 Matches to compare self-reported sex, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, disability status, and citizenship between applicants who submitted ROLs and applicants who matched. Of the 73 426 applicants who submitted ROLs, 60 655 applicants matched. A higher percentage of matched applicants were female as compared to those who submitted ROLs (+2.0%, 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.5). A higher percentage of matched applicants identified as bisexual (+0.2%, 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.4), whereas a lower percentage of matched applicants identified as heterosexual (-0.4%, 95% CI, -0.7 to -0.1). White applicants represented a higher percentage of matched applicants (+2.9%, 95% CI, 2.3 to 3.4), whereas Asian and Black/African American applicants comprised lower percentages of matched applicants as compared to all applicants (Asian: -1.5%, 95% CI, -2 to -1; Black/African American: -0.6%, 95% CI, -1 to -0.3). Hispanic/Latino and non-US citizens also comprised lower percentages of matched applicants (Hispanic/Latino: -0.5%, 95% CI, -0.8 to -0.1; non-US citizen: -4.9%, 95% CI, -5.3 to -4.5). There was no difference for applicants with disabilities. Differences exist between the demographics of applicants who submitted ROLs compared to those who matched.

摘要

住院医师选拔过程可能会改变具有某些人口统计学特征的申请人的代表性。应研究选拔各阶段潜在偏差的影响。为了调查提交排名顺序表(ROL)的申请人与在国家住院医师匹配计划(NRMP)主要住院医师匹配中匹配成功的申请人之间的差异。我们分析了2022年和2023年匹配的NRMP公开数据,以比较提交ROL的申请人和匹配成功的申请人之间自我报告的性别、性取向、种族、族裔、残疾状况和公民身份。在提交ROL的73426名申请人中,有60655名申请人匹配成功。与提交ROL的申请人相比,匹配成功的女性申请人比例更高(+2.0%,95%置信区间,1.4至2.5)。匹配成功的申请人中,认定为双性恋的比例更高(+0.2%,95%置信区间,0.04至0.4),而认定为异性恋的匹配成功申请人比例更低(-0.4%,95%置信区间,-0.7至-0.1)。白人申请人在匹配成功的申请人中占比更高(+2.9%,95%置信区间,2.3至3.4),而与所有申请人相比,亚洲和黑人/非裔美国申请人在匹配成功的申请人中占比更低(亚洲人:-1.5%,95%置信区间,-2至-1;黑人/非裔美国人:-0.6%,95%置信区间,-1至-0.3)。西班牙裔/拉丁裔和非美国公民在匹配成功的申请人中占比也更低(西班牙裔/拉丁裔:-0.5%,95%置信区间,-0.8至-0.1;非美国公民:-4.9%,95%置信区间,-5.3至-4.5)。残疾申请人之间没有差异。提交ROL的申请人与匹配成功的申请人在人口统计学上存在差异。

相似文献

1
Demographic Differences Between Applicants Who Submitted Rank Order Lists and Applicants Who Matched in 2022 and 2023.
J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Apr;17(2):196-203. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00512.1. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
2
Demographic Differences in the Radiology Residency Match, 2022 to 2024.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2025 Jan;22(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.10.016. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
3
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in US Anesthesiology Residency Matching.
Anesth Analg. 2024 Nov 1;139(5):913-920. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007102. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
5
Increasing lengths of rank order lists of applicants and programs of US medical residencies.
Am Surg. 2023 Apr;89(4):952-960. doi: 10.1177/00031348211050831. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
6
Underrepresented Minorities are Underrepresented Among General Surgery Applicants Selected to Interview.
J Surg Educ. 2019 Nov-Dec;76(6):e15-e23. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
9
Large Language Models in Otolaryngology Residency Admissions: A Random Sampling Analysis.
Laryngoscope. 2025 Jan;135(1):87-93. doi: 10.1002/lary.31705. Epub 2024 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of the Main Residency Match for Applicants With Disability.
JAMA. 2024 May 14;331(18):1590-1592. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.5000.
3
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Resident Selection in 11 Specialties, 2013-2018.
JAMA. 2022 Jun 28;327(24):2450-2452. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.6424.
4
Evidence of Specialty-Specific Gender Disparities in Resident Recruitment and Selection.
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Dec;13(6):841-847. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00337.1. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
5
Navigating Bias on Interview Day: Strategies for Charting an Inclusive and Equitable Course.
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Aug;13(4):466-470. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00001.1. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
6
Improving Diversity in Pediatric Residency Selection: Using an Equity Framework to Implement Holistic Review.
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Apr;13(2):195-200. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-01024.1. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
8
Race, But Not Gender, Is Associated With Admissions Into Orthopaedic Residency Programs.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Aug 1;480(8):1441-1449. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001553. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
10
Do male chairs of surgery have implicit gender bias in the residency application process?
Am J Surg. 2021 Apr;221(4):697-700. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.08.010. Epub 2020 Aug 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验