• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[西班牙射频肾动脉去神经术治疗难治性高血压的成本效益分析]

[Cost-effectiveness analysis of radiofrequency renal denervation for uncontrolled hypertension in Spain].

作者信息

Rodríguez-Leor Oriol, Ryschon Anne M, Cao Khoa N, Jaén-Águila Fernando, García-Camarero Tamara, Mansilla-Morales Carlos, Kolovetsios Michael, Álvarez-Orozco María, García-Donaire José Antonio, Pietzsch Jan B

机构信息

Institut del Cor (ICOR), Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España Institut del Cor (ICOR) Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol Barcelona España.

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV) Instituto de Salud Carlos III Madrid España.

出版信息

REC Interv Cardiol. 2024 Oct 30;6(4):305-312. doi: 10.24875/RECIC.M24000478. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.

DOI:10.24875/RECIC.M24000478
PMID:40417339
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12097359/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Radiofrequency (RF) renal denervation (RDN) has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with uncontrolled hypertension. This analysis sought to explore the cost-effectiveness of this therapy in Spain.

METHODS

A decision-analytic Markov model projected clinical events, quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and costs over the patients' lifetime. Treatment effectiveness in the base case analysis was informed by the change in office systolic blood pressure observed in the full cohort of the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial (-4.9 mmHg vs sham control). Alternate scenarios were calculated for effect sizes reported in the HTN-ON MED subcohort of patients on 3 antihypertensive medications treated outside the United States, the HTN-OFF MED trial, and the Global SYMPLICITY Registry high-risk and very high-risk cohorts. The analysis was conducted from the Spanish National Health System perspective and a willingness-to-pay a threshold of 25000 per QALY gained was considered.

RESULTS

RF RDN therapy resulted in clinical event reductions (10-year relative risk 0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for myocardial infarction, and 0.72 for heart failure) and a lifetime gain of 0.35 (13.99 vs 13.63) QALYs. Incremental lifetime costs were 5335 (26 381 vs 21 045), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 15 057 per QALY gained. Cost-effectiveness was further improved among all the other clinical evidence scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that RF RDN can provide a cost-effective alternative in the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension in Spain.

摘要

引言与目的

射频(RF)肾去神经术(RDN)已被证明是治疗难治性高血压患者的一种安全有效的治疗选择。本分析旨在探讨该疗法在西班牙的成本效益。

方法

采用决策分析马尔可夫模型预测患者一生中的临床事件、质量调整生命年(QALY)和成本。基础病例分析中的治疗效果依据SPYRAL HTN-ON MED试验全队列中观察到的诊室收缩压变化(-4.9 mmHg,与假手术对照组相比)。针对在美国境外接受3种抗高血压药物治疗的HTN-ON MED亚组患者、HTN-OFF MED试验以及全球SYMPLICITY注册研究的高危和极高危队列中报告的效应大小,计算了替代方案。分析是从西班牙国家卫生系统的角度进行的,并考虑了每获得一个QALY愿意支付25000的阈值。

结果

RF RDN疗法使临床事件减少(中风的10年相对风险为0.80,心肌梗死为0.88,心力衰竭为0.72),一生可获得0.35(13.99对13.63)个QALY。终生增量成本为5335(26381对21045),导致每获得一个QALY的增量成本效益比为15057。在所有其他临床证据情景中,成本效益进一步提高。

结论

本研究结果表明,RF RDN在西班牙治疗难治性高血压方面可提供一种具有成本效益的替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a186/12097359/9893b14dcd2e/2604-7306-recic-6-4-305-en-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a186/12097359/8f811b19082e/2604-7306-recic-6-4-305-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a186/12097359/80f87f8edf94/2604-7306-recic-6-4-305-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a186/12097359/02afdc1f20d5/2604-7306-recic-6-4-305-en-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a186/12097359/9893b14dcd2e/2604-7306-recic-6-4-305-en-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a186/12097359/8f811b19082e/2604-7306-recic-6-4-305-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a186/12097359/80f87f8edf94/2604-7306-recic-6-4-305-gf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a186/12097359/02afdc1f20d5/2604-7306-recic-6-4-305-en-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a186/12097359/9893b14dcd2e/2604-7306-recic-6-4-305-en-gf2.jpg

相似文献

1
[Cost-effectiveness analysis of radiofrequency renal denervation for uncontrolled hypertension in Spain].[西班牙射频肾动脉去神经术治疗难治性高血压的成本效益分析]
REC Interv Cardiol. 2024 Oct 30;6(4):305-312. doi: 10.24875/RECIC.M24000478. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of radiofrequency renal denervation for uncontrolled hypertension in Sweden.瑞典射频肾动脉去神经术治疗难治性高血压的成本效益分析。
Blood Press. 2025 Dec;34(1):2487583. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2025.2487583. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of radiofrequency renal denervation for uncontrolled hypertension in Canada.加拿大射频肾动脉去神经术治疗难治性高血压的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2025 Dec;28(1):70-80. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2441072. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Renal Denervation for Uncontrolled Hypertension in Japan.日本射频肾动脉去神经术治疗难治性高血压的成本效益分析
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024 Dec;26(12):1502-1512. doi: 10.1111/jch.14922. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
5
Cost-effectiveness of catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation for the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension: an analysis for the UK based on recent clinical evidence.基于导管的射频肾动脉去神经术治疗难治性高血压的成本效益:基于近期临床证据的英国分析。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2024 Dec 19;10(8):698-708. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae001.
6
Catheter-Based Radiofrequency Renal Denervation in the United States: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on Contemporary Evidence.美国基于导管的射频肾去神经术:基于当代证据的成本效益分析。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Aug 13;3(10):102234. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102234. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
Impact of Antihypertensive Medication Changes After Renal Denervation Among Different Patient Groups: SPYRAL HTN-ON MED.不同患者群体肾去神经术后降压药物变化的影响:SPYRAL HTN-ON MED 试验
Hypertension. 2024 May;81(5):1095-1105. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.22251. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation in Patients Taking Antihypertensive Medications.抗高血压药物治疗患者的肾脏去神经术的安全性和疗效。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Nov 7;82(19):1809-1823. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.045.
9
Cost effectiveness of renal denervation therapy for the treatment of resistant hypertension in the UK.肾去神经支配疗法治疗英国顽固性高血压的成本效益
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Dec;12(6):611-22. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0116-7.
10
Effect of Heart Rate on the Outcome of Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension.心率对高血压未控制患者肾去神经治疗结局的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Sep 7;78(10):1028-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.06.044.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of ultrasound renal denervation reducing blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.超声肾去神经术降低血压的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
REC Interv Cardiol. 2025 Apr 29;7(3):154-163. doi: 10.24875/RECICE.M25000509. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Numerical values and impact of hypertension in Spain.西班牙的高血压数值和影响。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2024 Sep;77(9):767-778. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2024.03.011. Epub 2024 May 1.
2
Impact of Antihypertensive Medication Changes After Renal Denervation Among Different Patient Groups: SPYRAL HTN-ON MED.不同患者群体肾去神经术后降压药物变化的影响:SPYRAL HTN-ON MED 试验
Hypertension. 2024 May;81(5):1095-1105. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.22251. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
3
Cost-effectiveness of catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation for the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension: an analysis for the UK based on recent clinical evidence.
基于导管的射频肾动脉去神经术治疗难治性高血压的成本效益:基于近期临床证据的英国分析。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2024 Dec 19;10(8):698-708. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae001.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation in Patients Taking Antihypertensive Medications.抗高血压药物治疗患者的肾脏去神经术的安全性和疗效。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Nov 7;82(19):1809-1823. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.045.
5
Perspectives on improving blood pressure control to reduce the clinical and economic burden of hypertension.改善血压控制以降低高血压的临床和经济负担的观点。
J Intern Med. 2023 Sep;294(3):251-268. doi: 10.1111/joim.13678. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
6
2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension: Endorsed by the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) and the European Renal Association (ERA).2023ESH 动脉高血压管理指南 欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理工作组:得到国际高血压学会 (ISH) 和欧洲肾脏协会 (ERA) 的认可。
J Hypertens. 2023 Dec 1;41(12):1874-2071. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003480. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
7
Cardiovascular Risk Reduction After Renal Denervation According to Time in Therapeutic Systolic Blood Pressure Range.根据治疗收缩压范围内的时间,肾去神经支配后心血管风险降低。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Nov 15;80(20):1871-1880. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.802.
8
Long-term outcomes after catheter-based renal artery denervation for resistant hypertension: final follow-up of the randomised SYMPLICITY HTN-3 Trial.基于导管的肾动脉去神经术治疗耐药性高血压的长期结果:随机 SYMPLICITY HTN-3 试验的最终随访。
Lancet. 2022 Oct 22;400(10361):1405-1416. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01787-1. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
9
Burden of ischemic heart disease in Spain: incidence, hospital mortality and costs of hospital care.西班牙缺血性心脏病负担:发病率、住院死亡率和住院治疗费用。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Oct;22(7):1147-1152. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2022.2108794. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
10
Long-term efficacy and safety of renal denervation in the presence of antihypertensive drugs (SPYRAL HTN-ON MED): a randomised, sham-controlled trial.在使用抗高血压药物的情况下肾动脉去神经术的长期疗效和安全性(SPYRAL HTN-ON MED):一项随机、假手术对照试验。
Lancet. 2022 Apr 9;399(10333):1401-1410. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00455-X. Epub 2022 Apr 4.