• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Donor artery in coronary total occlusion recanalization: QFR versus FFR].

作者信息

Scorpiglione Luca, Ruiz Ruiz Julio, Gutiérrez Alejandro, Fernández-Cisnal Agustín, Cortés-Villar Carlos, Amat-Santos Ignacio J

机构信息

Departamento de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, España Departamento de Cardiología Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid Valladolid España.

Departamento de Cardiología, Hospital del Mar, Cádiz, España Departamento de Cardiología Hospital del Mar Cádiz España.

出版信息

REC Interv Cardiol. 2024 Aug 13;6(4):353-355. doi: 10.24875/RECIC.M24000466. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.

DOI:10.24875/RECIC.M24000466
PMID:40417345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12097309/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b0/12097309/7240b1d03b53/2604-7306-recic-6-4-353-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b0/12097309/691b96a4b871/2604-7306-recic-6-4-353-en-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b0/12097309/7240b1d03b53/2604-7306-recic-6-4-353-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b0/12097309/691b96a4b871/2604-7306-recic-6-4-353-en-gf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22b0/12097309/7240b1d03b53/2604-7306-recic-6-4-353-gf1.jpg

相似文献

1
[Donor artery in coronary total occlusion recanalization: QFR versus FFR].[冠状动脉完全闭塞再通中的供血动脉：定量血流分数与血流储备分数对比]
REC Interv Cardiol. 2024 Aug 13;6(4):353-355. doi: 10.24875/RECIC.M24000466. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
2
Correlation and Agreement of Quantitative Flow Ratio With Fractional Flow Reserve in Saphenous Vein Grafts.定量血流比与隐静脉桥的分流量储备的相关性和一致性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 5;13(21):e034901. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034901. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
3
QFR Versus FFR Derived From Computed Tomography for Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis.定量血流分数（QFR）与 CT 计算得出的血流储备分数（FFR）在冠状动脉狭窄功能评估中的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 28;12(20):2050-2059. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.043.
4
Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve for coronary revascularisation guidance (FAVOR III Europe): a multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial.定量血流比与分数血流储备用于冠状动脉血运重建指导（FAVOR III Europe）：一项多中心、随机、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2024 Nov 9;404(10465):1835-1846. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02175-5. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
5
Diagnostic Performance of In-Procedure Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Reserve Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan Study.术中血管造影衍生的定量血流储备与压力衍生的分数流量储备的诊断性能比较：FAVOR II 欧洲-日本研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jul 6;7(14):e009603. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009603.
6
Diagnostic performance of ultrasonic flow ratio versus quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis.超声流量比与定量流量比评估冠状动脉狭窄的诊断性能比较。
Int J Cardiol. 2024 Apr 1;400:131765. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.131765. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
7
Quantitative flow ratio of the donor coronary artery supplying a chronic total occlusion territory.供应慢性完全闭塞区域的供体冠状动脉的定量血流比率。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Dec 23. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02589-x.
8
Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术中定量血流比评估冠状动脉狭窄：WIFI II 研究（无导线功能成像 II）。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):e007107. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007107.
9
Coronary Artery Stenosis Evaluation by Angiography-Derived FFR: Validation by Positron Emission Tomography and Invasive Thermodilution.冠状动脉狭窄的血管造影衍生 FFR 评估：正电子发射断层扫描和侵入性热稀释法的验证。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Oct;16(10):1321-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
10
Computational quantitative flow ratio to assess functional severity of coronary artery stenosis.计算定量血流比评估冠状动脉狭窄的功能严重程度。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 15;271:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Aug 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of Quantitative Flow Ratio-Derived Virtual Angioplasty with Post-Angioplasty Fractional Flow Reserve-The QIMERA-I Study.定量血流比率衍生的虚拟血管成形术与血管成形术后血流储备分数的验证——QIMERA-I研究
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Dec 31;11(1):14. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11010014.
2
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI 冠状动脉血运重建指南：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 18;79(2):e21-e129. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
3
Coronary physiology before and after chronic total occlusion treatment: what does it tell us?
慢性完全闭塞病变治疗前后的冠状动脉生理学：它能告诉我们什么？
Neth Heart J. 2021 Jan;29(1):22-29. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01470-6.
4
Quantitative flow ratio-Meta-analysis and systematic review.定量血流比——荟萃分析与系统评价
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 1;97(5):807-814. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28857. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
5
Collateral donor artery physiology and the influence of a chronic total occlusion on fractional flow reserve.侧支供血动脉生理学及慢性完全闭塞对血流储备分数的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr;8(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002219.