Nagabaskaran Gokulan, Thambiahpillay Aaron, Ledon Nuris, Bagshaw Richard, Lozada Sum Lai, Rivas Gabriela, Leon Kalet, Licollari Albert
Nucro-Technics, 2000 Ellesmere Road, Unit 16, Toronto, Ontario M1H 2W4, Canada.
Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada.
Toxicol Rep. 2025 Apr 25;14:102039. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.102039. eCollection 2025 Jun.
The potential toxicity, safety and anti-drug antibody production of the novel IL-2 "no-alpha" mutein is in need of investigation as it may be a critical candidate for cancer therapy. The design of this mutein is meant to reduce toxicity compared to the IL-2 wildtype by disrupting interactions with the alpha receptor (CD25) and increasing the efficacy of the treatment. This was assessed following administration to Sprague-Dawley rats intravenously (IV), and it occurred over three cycles of five days each with daily dosing, with a 9-day washout period between each cycle. For the mutein dose groups, animals were dosed via IV at dose levels of 600, 6000, 18,000 U/kg. This dosing regimen is equivalent to 1x, 10x, and 30x the proposed first human dose, respectively. This study also assessed the progression or regression of any effects following a 14-day treatment-free recovery period for the control and high dose groups. Rats that were administered the "no-alpha" mutein at 600 and 6000 U/kg were well-tolerated with no apparent abnormal observations in general health, behaviour and autonomic function. There was no evidence of systemic toxicity based on evaluations in clinical pathology, gross necropsy and histopathology. At 18,000 U/kg (30x), abnormal clinical signs were observed at the injection sites consisting of localized swelling, discoloration, scabbing and necrosis. These animals showed a significant recovery in abnormal localized clinical signs following the treatment free period. Additionally other parameters did not indicate any significantly detrimental effects at this dose level. Therefore, the IL-2 mutein "no-alpha" seems to hold promise as a valuable addition to the current array of cancer therapy strategies, especially at the proposed dose level.
新型白细胞介素-2“无α”突变体的潜在毒性、安全性及抗药物抗体产生情况有待研究,因为它可能是癌症治疗的关键候选药物。该突变体的设计旨在通过破坏与α受体(CD25)的相互作用并提高治疗效果,从而降低与白细胞介素-2野生型相比的毒性。在对斯普拉格-道利大鼠进行静脉注射(IV)后进行了评估,给药过程分三个周期,每个周期持续五天,每天给药一次,每个周期之间有9天的洗脱期。对于突变体剂量组,动物通过静脉注射给予600、6000、18000 U/kg的剂量水平。该给药方案分别相当于拟议的首次人体剂量的1倍、10倍和30倍。本研究还评估了对照组和高剂量组在14天无治疗恢复期后任何效应的进展或消退情况。以600和6000 U/kg剂量给予“无α”突变体的大鼠耐受性良好,在一般健康、行为和自主神经功能方面未观察到明显异常。根据临床病理学、大体尸检和组织病理学评估,没有全身毒性的证据。在18000 U/kg(30倍)时,在注射部位观察到异常临床体征,包括局部肿胀、变色、结痂和坏死。在无治疗期后,这些动物的局部异常临床体征有显著恢复。此外,在该剂量水平下,其他参数未显示任何明显的有害影响。因此,白细胞介素-2“无α”突变体似乎有望成为当前一系列癌症治疗策略中有价值的补充,特别是在所提议的剂量水平。