Kim Han-Som, Kim Seon-A, Jang Jong-Sik
Kangwon National University Graduate School, Samcheok-si, Republic of Korea.
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251338928. doi: 10.1177/00469580251338928. Epub 2025 May 26.
This study aimed to determine whether the Korean version of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is suitable for assessing the balance ability of patients with spinal cord injury. The results of the Korean version of the BBS were collected from 80 patients with spinal cord injury. The collected data were analyzed using Rasch analysis to determine the suitability of participants and items, item difficulty, rating scale, and separation reliability. Of the 80 participants, 7 were evaluated as unsuitable participants, and 1 of 14 items was judged unsuitable. Item 7 was unfit, "standing unsupported with feet together." Item 14, "standing on 1 leg," was the most difficult, and item 3, "sitting unsupported," was the simplest. The results of the rating scale analysis showed that a four-point scale (0-3 points) was appropriate when administering the Korean version of the BBS to patients with spinal cord injury. The separation reliability for the items was 0.99, and the separation reliability for the participants was 0.97. The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the BBS were verified by applying Rasch analysis to patients with spinal cord injury. Based on the results of this study, the Korean version of the BBS is suitable for evaluating the balance ability of patients with spinal cord injury. It is expected to provide evidence for clinical use.
本研究旨在确定韩文版伯格平衡量表(BBS)是否适用于评估脊髓损伤患者的平衡能力。从80例脊髓损伤患者中收集了韩文版BBS的结果。使用拉施分析对收集的数据进行分析,以确定参与者和项目的适用性、项目难度、评分量表及区分度信度。在80名参与者中,7人被评估为不适合参与,14个项目中有1个被判定不适合。项目7不适合,即“双脚并拢无支撑站立”。项目14“单腿站立”最难,项目3“无支撑坐姿”最简单。评分量表分析结果表明,对脊髓损伤患者使用韩文版BBS时,四分制量表(0 - 3分)是合适的。项目的区分度信度为0.99,参与者的区分度信度为0.97。通过对脊髓损伤患者应用拉施分析,验证了韩文版BBS的信度和效度。基于本研究结果,韩文版BBS适用于评估脊髓损伤患者的平衡能力。有望为临床应用提供依据。