• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化经阴道自然腔道内镜手术子宫切除术:GelPoint和手套技术的比较分析

Optimizing V-NOTES hysterectomy: a comparative analysis of GelPoint and Glove techniques.

作者信息

Bulutlar Eralp, Uluutku Bulutlar Gizem Berfin, Şahin Sadık

机构信息

Zeynep Kamil Women's and Children's Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye, Türkiye.

Haydarpaşa Numune Education and Research Hospital, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinic, Istanbul, Türkiye.

出版信息

Ginekol Pol. 2025;96(8):624-629. doi: 10.5603/gpl.104335. Epub 2025 May 26.

DOI:10.5603/gpl.104335
PMID:40418042
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (V-NOTES) has emerged as a minimally invasive approach for hysterectomies, offering improved outcomes and patient satisfaction. Various techniques, including the GelPoint® and Glove methods, are used during V-NOTES procedures, each with potential advantages and drawbacks. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of the GelPoint® and Glove techniques in V-NOTES hysterectomy surgeries by evaluating their impact on surgical outcomes, complication rates, operative time, patient satisfaction, aesthetic results, and costs. This is a retrospective study analyzing data from patients who underwent V-NOTES hysterectomy between 2022 and 2024.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 60 patients were included, divided into two groups based on the technique used: GelPoint (n = 30) and Glove (n = 30). Data on operative time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, hospital stay duration, aesthetic satisfaction, and costs were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the GelPoint group (85 ± 12 minutes) compared to the Glove group (102 ± 15 minutes, p < 0.01). Postoperative complication rates were also lower in the GelPoint group (7%) than in the Glove group (15%, p < 0.05). The material cost for the Glove technique was 200 USD, whereas for the GelPoint technique, it was 500 USD.

CONCLUSIONS

Both GelPoint and Glove techniques are safe and effective for V-NOTES hysterectomies. The GelPoint technique is associated with shorter operative times and fewer complications, whereas the Glove technique provides a more cost-effective solution.

摘要

目的

经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(V-NOTES)已成为子宫切除术的一种微创方法,能带来更好的手术效果和患者满意度。在V-NOTES手术过程中使用了多种技术,包括GelPoint®技术和手套法,每种技术都有潜在的优缺点。本研究旨在通过评估GelPoint®技术和手套法对手术效果、并发症发生率、手术时间、患者满意度、美学效果和成本的影响,比较它们在V-NOTES子宫切除术中的有效性。这是一项回顾性研究,分析了2022年至2024年间接受V-NOTES子宫切除术患者的数据。

材料与方法

共纳入60例患者,根据所使用的技术分为两组:GelPoint组(n = 30)和手套法组(n = 30)。回顾性收集手术时间、术中及术后并发症、住院时间、美学满意度和成本的数据。

结果

GelPoint组的平均手术时间(85±12分钟)明显短于手套法组(102±15分钟,p < 0.01)。GelPoint组的术后并发症发生率(7%)也低于手套法组(15%,p < 0.05)。手套法的材料成本为200美元,而GelPoint技术的材料成本为500美元。

结论

GelPoint技术和手套法在V-NOTES子宫切除术中都是安全有效的。GelPoint技术手术时间更短,并发症更少,而手套法提供了更具成本效益的解决方案。

相似文献

1
Optimizing V-NOTES hysterectomy: a comparative analysis of GelPoint and Glove techniques.优化经阴道自然腔道内镜手术子宫切除术:GelPoint和手套技术的比较分析
Ginekol Pol. 2025;96(8):624-629. doi: 10.5603/gpl.104335. Epub 2025 May 26.
2
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病的子宫切除术手术入路。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6.
3
Postoperative outcomes and quality of life following hysterectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) compared to laparoscopy in women with a non-prolapsed uterus and benign gynaecological disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)与腹腔镜手术治疗非脱垂子宫和良性妇科疾病女性子宫切除术后的结局及生活质量:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Jan;208:6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.044. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.双层手套可减少手术交叉感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.
6
Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids.子宫动脉栓塞术治疗有症状的子宫肌瘤。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 26;2014(12):CD005073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005073.pub4.
7
Pre-operative endometrial thinning agents before endometrial destruction for heavy menstrual bleeding.对于月经过多进行子宫内膜破坏术前的子宫内膜减薄剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(3):CD001124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001124.
8
Hysterectomy, endometrial ablation and Mirena® for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis.子宫切除术、子宫内膜消融术和 Mirena®治疗月经过多:临床有效性和成本效益分析的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Apr;15(19):iii-xvi, 1-252. doi: 10.3310/hta15190.
9
Pre-operative endometrial thinning agents before endometrial destruction for heavy menstrual bleeding.对于月经过多患者,在进行子宫内膜破坏术前使用的术前子宫内膜减薄剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 15;2013(11):CD010241. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010241.pub2.
10
Comparison of conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy and vNOTES hysterectomy in previous pelvic surgery: a retrospective study.既往盆腔手术中传统腹腔镜子宫切除术与经阴道自然腔道内镜手术子宫切除术的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 20;15(1):30629. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16525-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Critique on "Hysterectomy for oncological and non-oncological reasons in patients over 70 years of age: comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches".对“70岁以上患者因肿瘤和非肿瘤原因行子宫切除术:机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放手术方式的比较”的评论
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 9;19(1):581. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02759-7.
2
Hysterectomy for oncological and non-oncological reasons in patients over 70 years of age - comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches.70岁以上患者因肿瘤和非肿瘤原因进行子宫切除术——机器人辅助、腹腔镜和开放手术方式的比较
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 19;19(1):497. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02676-9.