Vanthoor Joren, Herrmann Thomas R W, De Coninck Vincent
Department of Urology, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium.
Department of Urology, Spital Thurgau AG, Kantonsspital Frauenfeld, Pfaffenholzstrasse 4, Frauenfeld, CH, 8501, Switzerland.
World J Urol. 2025 May 26;43(1):325. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05474-y.
Urethral strictures are a well-known complication following endoscopic treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Although the exact cause remains unclear, repetitive instrument movement and pressure-induced ischemia are likely contributing factors. While the incidence seems lower after enucleation compared to transurethral resection of the prostate, it remains important to prevent this iatrogenic complication. A small randomized trial suggested a benefit from preoperative urethral dilatation, though findings were constrained by limited sample size and follow-up. Similarly, studies comparing resectoscope sizes have not yet demonstrated significant differences in stricture rates. Drawing parallels with ureteral stricture prevention, where prestenting with a ureteral catheter is commonly used, we hypothesize that preoperative transurethral catheterization may relax and dilate the urethra, potentially lowering the risk of stricture formation. Clinical observations support this: patients with preoperative indwelling catheters before endoscopic treatment of BPH often display a more compliant urethra during surgery. While mechanical irritation remains a theoretical concern of placing a catheter, the relaxing effect may outweigh potential harm, much like DJ-stent use in the ureter. A prospective study will be conducted within the EAU Endourology Consortium to evaluate this hypothesis, incorporating force-sensing dilators and standardized follow-up with uroflowmetry and cystoscopy at 3 and 6 months. If successful, preoperative catheterization may offer a simple, low-risk strategy to reduce urethral strictures in BPH surgery, particularly in patients with a narrow urethra.
尿道狭窄是良性前列腺增生(BPH)内镜治疗后一种众所周知的并发症。尽管确切原因尚不清楚,但反复器械操作和压力诱导的缺血可能是促成因素。与经尿道前列腺切除术相比,剜除术后尿道狭窄的发生率似乎较低,但预防这种医源性并发症仍然很重要。一项小型随机试验表明术前尿道扩张有益,不过研究结果受到样本量和随访有限的限制。同样,比较电切镜尺寸的研究尚未显示在狭窄发生率方面存在显著差异。与输尿管狭窄预防相类比,输尿管狭窄预防通常采用输尿管导管预置,我们推测术前经尿道插管可能会使尿道松弛和扩张,从而有可能降低狭窄形成的风险。临床观察支持这一观点:在BPH内镜治疗前留置导尿管的患者在手术过程中尿道往往更顺应。虽然放置导管在理论上仍存在机械刺激问题,但松弛作用可能超过潜在危害,这与输尿管中使用DJ支架类似。欧洲泌尿外科学会腔内泌尿外科联盟将开展一项前瞻性研究来评估这一假设,研究将纳入力敏扩张器,并在3个月和6个月时采用尿流率测定和膀胱镜检查进行标准化随访。如果成功,术前插管可能为降低BPH手术中尿道狭窄提供一种简单、低风险的策略,尤其是对于尿道狭窄的患者。