Suppr超能文献

超声引导下使用18号带刃针头进行微创扳机指松解术:病例系列

Ultrasound-guided microinvasive trigger thumb release with an 18-gauge blade-tipped needle: A case series.

作者信息

Vega Tomas F, Colberg Ricardo E, Kremser Victor J, Sankar Sharan, Aiken Campbell B, Naman Trace, Yates Alexandra, Ithurburn Matthew P

机构信息

Andrews Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, Birmingham, AL.

American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, AL.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 23;104(21):e42474. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042474.

Abstract

Ultrasound (US)-guided trigger finger release provides comparable outcomes to open surgical release, yet there is a lingering concern for neurovascular injury specifically in the thumb due to its unique anatomy. This study evaluated the outcomes of patients undergoing US-guided trigger thumb release. A retrospective case series of patients undergoing US-guided trigger thumb release using an 18-gauge blade-tipped needle evaluated outcomes, including resolution of mechanical symptoms, improvement in pain and function, ability to return to daily activities, major or minor complications, and need for revision procedures. Twenty-eight patients (29 cases) with an average age of 59.2 (31-91 years, SD 11.8) met criteria and agreed to participate in the study. Average follow-up time was 3.4 years (1.0-5.9 years, SD 1.2) post-procedure. 100% of the patients reported complete resolution of mechanical symptoms. Average numeric pain rating scale and Nirschl scores were 0.2 (SD 0.5) and 0.1 (SD 0.3), respectively. 100% of patients were able to return to work and 96% were able to return to recreational activities. No major or minor complications (including neurovascular injuries) were reported. No patients required a revision procedure. US-guided trigger thumb release using a blade-tipped needle appears to be a safe and effective procedure when performed by an experienced provider. Further research will be needed to establish its generalizability and characterize comparative outcomes and risk-benefit profiles of this technique compared to open surgical trigger thumb releases.

摘要

超声(US)引导下扳机指松解术的效果与开放手术松解相当,但由于拇指独特的解剖结构,人们一直担心其会出现神经血管损伤。本研究评估了接受超声引导下扳机拇指松解术患者的疗效。一项回顾性病例系列研究,纳入了使用18号带刃尖针进行超声引导下扳机拇指松解术的患者,评估了包括机械性症状的缓解、疼痛和功能的改善、恢复日常活动的能力、主要或次要并发症以及翻修手术需求等疗效指标。28例患者(29例次),平均年龄59.2岁(31 - 91岁,标准差11.8)符合标准并同意参与研究。术后平均随访时间为3.4年(1.0 - 5.9年,标准差1.2)。100%的患者报告机械性症状完全缓解。平均数字疼痛评分量表和Nirschl评分分别为0.2(标准差0.5)和0.1(标准差0.3)。100%的患者能够重返工作岗位,96%的患者能够恢复娱乐活动。未报告任何主要或次要并发症(包括神经血管损伤)。没有患者需要进行翻修手术。由经验丰富的医生进行超声引导下使用带刃尖针的扳机拇指松解术似乎是一种安全有效的手术。需要进一步研究以确定其可推广性,并与开放手术扳机拇指松解术相比,描述该技术的比较疗效和风险 - 效益概况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验