Liu Rui-Zhi, Zhao Xiao-Ya, Feng Biao, Zhao Wen-Shan, Li Ming-Yu, Yu Xiao-Fang, Hu Shu-Ping, Li Rui-Ping, Gao Ju-Lin, Borjigin Qinggeer
College of Agriculture, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China.
Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Genetic Improvement of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot, China.
Front Microbiol. 2025 May 12;16:1590686. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1590686. eCollection 2025.
Straw return has gained attention for its potential to improve soil quality and crop yields, particularly in semi-arid regions like the Tumu Chuan Plain Irrigation Area. Soil bacteria play a crucial role in regulating soil biological processes, and understanding how straw return affects bacterial populations can guide better agricultural management practices.
We investigated the impact of continuous straw return on soil bacterial communities using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Four treatments were applied: Farmers' shallow rotation (CK), straw incorporated with deep tillage (DPR), straw incorporated with subsoiling (SSR), and no-tillage mulching straw return (NTR). Bacterial community structure, metabolic pathways, and assembly mechanisms were analyzed using Bugbase and PICRUSt2 for phenotypic and metabolic pathway predictions.
The study found that straw return practices significantly altered the relative abundance and life history strategies of bacterial phyla, mainly influenced by soil organic matter (SOM) and enzyme activity. The K-strategist to r-strategist ratio was highest in CK (2.06) and lowest in SSR (1.89). DPR and NTR treatments significantly changed bacterial community structure compared to CK ( < 0.05), resembling SSR. Predictions showed that DPR and NTR enhanced carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism and promoted more stable bacterial networks, with homogenous selection and drift effects. Bacterial aggregation in all treatments was driven by random processes, with varying aggregation levels: CK (20%), DPR (38.6%), SSR (16.5%), and NTR (30.7%).
The study demonstrates that continuous straw return practices significantly impact soil bacterial communities. DPR and NTR notably improved microbial diversity, bacterial cooperation, and ecosystem stability. These findings provide valuable insights for sustainable agricultural practices in semi-arid regions, enhancing soil microbial ecology and soil health through strategic straw return.
秸秆还田因其改善土壤质量和作物产量的潜力而受到关注,特别是在土默川平原灌区等半干旱地区。土壤细菌在调节土壤生物过程中起着关键作用,了解秸秆还田如何影响细菌种群可以指导更好的农业管理实践。
我们使用16S rRNA基因测序研究了连续秸秆还田对土壤细菌群落的影响。采用了四种处理方式:农民浅旋耕(CK)、深耕秸秆还田(DPR)、深松秸秆还田(SSR)和免耕覆盖秸秆还田(NTR)。使用Bugbase和PICRUSt2分析细菌群落结构、代谢途径和组装机制,以进行表型和代谢途径预测。
研究发现,秸秆还田措施显著改变了细菌门的相对丰度和生活史策略,主要受土壤有机质(SOM)和酶活性的影响。CK处理中K对策者与r对策者的比例最高(2.06),SSR处理中最低(1.89)。与CK相比,DPR和NTR处理显著改变了细菌群落结构(P < 0.05),与SSR相似。预测表明,DPR和NTR增强了碳水化合物和氨基酸代谢,促进了更稳定的细菌网络,具有同质化选择和漂变效应。所有处理中细菌聚集均由随机过程驱动,聚集水平各不相同:CK为20%,DPR为38.6%,SSR为16.5%,NTR为30.7%。
该研究表明,连续秸秆还田措施对土壤细菌群落有显著影响。DPR和NTR显著提高了微生物多样性、细菌协作和生态系统稳定性。这些发现为半干旱地区的可持续农业实践提供了有价值的见解,通过战略性秸秆还田增强土壤微生物生态学和土壤健康。