Suppr超能文献

调Q开关模式下铒钇铝石榴石激光用于间接粘结修复体堆塑:通过环境扫描电子显微镜(ESEM)进行表面粗糙度分析和形态评估

Er:YAG Laser in QSP Modality for Treatment of Indirect Adhesive Restoration Build-Up: Surface Roughness Analysis and Morphology Assessment by Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM).

作者信息

Giovannacci Ilaria, Mattarozzi Monica, Moroni Fabrizio, Pedrazzi Giuseppe, Vescovi Paolo, Careri Maria

机构信息

Oral Medicine and Oral Laser Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43125 Parma, Italy.

Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 17/A, 43124 Parma, Italy.

出版信息

Dent J (Basel). 2025 May 21;13(5):223. doi: 10.3390/dj13050223.

Abstract

Sandblasting build-ups before applying the acid and adhesive significantly improves the bond strength. The aim of this study is to evaluate, for the first time, the effectiveness of an Er:YAG laser used in QSP mode to treat the surface of build-ups before the adhesive cementation sequence. This ex vivo study was conducted on 12 intact, undecayed extracted teeth kept hydrated in NaCl 0.9% solution. A cavity was created in the center and reconstructed with composite resin (build-up). Then, samples were prepared with burs and divided into three groups: control group G1, prepared only with burs; group G2, in which surfaces were treated with a sandblaster (2.5 bar, 10 mm from composite surface, aluminum oxide, 10 s); and group G3, treated using an Er:YAG laser (QSP modality, 1 W, 10 Hz, 100 mJ). The surface roughness of the build-ups was measured using a CCI MP-L digital optical profiler (Taylor Hobson, Leicester, UK), and surface morphology was studied using the Quanta™ 250 FEG (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) ESEM instrument. Regarding enamel, mean surface roughness in G1 vs. G2 was not statistically significant ( = 0.968); meanwhile, differences between the Er:YAG laser group (G3) and G1 or G2 were significant (G3 vs. G1 < 0.001; G3 vs. G2 < 0.001). Regarding dentin, G1 vs. G2 was significant ( = 0.021); differences between G3 and G1 or G2 were extremely significant (G3 vs. G1 < 0.001; G3 vs. G2 < 0.001). The same trend was detected for resin. An Er:YAG laser in QSP mode used on the build-up surface for indirect adhesive restorations is innovative and should be investigated with further studies. However, it seems extremely effective with increased roughness, the absence of a smear layer and characteristics potentially favorable for good adhesion for all substrates (enamel, dentin, resin).

摘要

在涂抹酸和粘合剂之前进行喷砂处理可显著提高粘结强度。本研究的目的是首次评估在QSP模式下使用的铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光在粘结剂粘结程序之前处理修复体表面的有效性。这项体外研究是在12颗完整、未龋坏的离体牙上进行的,这些牙齿保存在0.9%的氯化钠溶液中保持湿润。在牙齿中央制备一个窝洞,并用复合树脂进行修复(堆塑)。然后,用牙钻制备样本并分为三组:对照组G1,仅用牙钻制备;G2组,其表面用喷砂器处理(2.5巴,距离复合树脂表面10毫米,氧化铝,10秒);G3组,使用Er:YAG激光处理(QSP模式,1瓦,10赫兹,100毫焦)。使用CCI MP-L数字光学轮廓仪(英国莱斯特的泰勒·霍布森公司)测量修复体的表面粗糙度,并使用Quanta™ 250 FEG(美国俄勒冈州希尔斯伯勒的FEI公司)环境扫描电子显微镜仪器研究表面形态。关于牙釉质,G1组和G2组之间的平均表面粗糙度无统计学意义( = 0.968);同时,Er:YAG激光组(G3组)与G1组或G2组之间的差异具有显著性(G3组与G1组 < 0.001;G3组与G2组 < 0.001)。关于牙本质,G1组与G2组有显著性差异( = 0.021);G3组与G1组或G2组之间的差异极其显著(G3组与G1组 < 0.001;G3组与G2组 < 0.001)。树脂也呈现相同趋势。用于间接粘结修复的修复体表面的QSP模式下的Er:YAG激光具有创新性,应通过进一步研究进行探究。然而,它似乎极其有效,能增加粗糙度、不存在玷污层且具有对所有基底(牙釉质、牙本质、树脂)良好粘结可能有利的特性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d6/12110732/2df5c9c367e3/dentistry-13-00223-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验