Marchetta Marcello, Sasso Stefano, Paragliola Vincenzo, Maffi Valerio, Chiricolo Gaetano, Massaro Gianluca, Russo Giulio, Benedetto Daniela, Muscoli Saverio, Colonna Giuseppe, Mandurino-Mirizzi Alessandro, Cortese Bernardo, Sangiorgi Giuseppe Massimo, Andò Giuseppe
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy.
Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Roma, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 May 5;12(5):176. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12050176.
Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged as a promising alternative therapeutic strategy to traditional drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in various coronary artery lesion scenarios, aiming to minimize complications associated with permanent metallic scaffolds, such as chronic inflammation, delayed vessel healing, and stent thrombosis. This review systematically evaluates the current clinical evidence supporting the use of DCBs across diverse anatomical and clinical contexts, including small-vessel disease, in-stent restenosis, bifurcation lesions, diffuse coronary lesions, acute coronary syndromes, and chronic total occlusions, as well as in special patient populations such as individuals with diabetes mellitus or at high bleeding risk. The literature analysis incorporated recent randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and real-world registries, highlighting the clinical efficacy, safety profiles, and specific advantages of DCB angioplasty. The findings consistently demonstrated non-inferior clinical outcomes of DCBs compared to DESs across multiple lesion types, with particular benefits observed in special populations, including reduced restenosis rates and comparable major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Nevertheless, clinical data gaps remain, emphasizing the need for larger, longer-term randomized trials to refine patient selection and procedural techniques. In conclusion, DCB angioplasty represents a viable and effective alternative to conventional stenting, particularly advantageous in complex lesions and specific patient subsets, pending further definitive evidence.
药物涂层球囊(DCB)已成为一种有前景的替代治疗策略,可用于各种冠状动脉病变情况,以替代传统的药物洗脱支架(DES)植入,旨在将与永久性金属支架相关的并发症降至最低,如慢性炎症、血管愈合延迟和支架血栓形成。本综述系统评估了支持在不同解剖和临床背景下使用DCB的现有临床证据,这些背景包括小血管疾病、支架内再狭窄、分叉病变、弥漫性冠状动脉病变、急性冠状动脉综合征和慢性完全闭塞,以及糖尿病患者或高出血风险等特殊患者群体。文献分析纳入了近期的随机对照试验、观察性研究和真实世界注册研究,突出了DCB血管成形术的临床疗效、安全性概况和特定优势。研究结果一致表明,在多种病变类型中,DCB的临床结局不劣于DES,在特殊人群中观察到了特别的益处,包括降低再狭窄率和可比的主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。然而,临床数据差距仍然存在,这强调需要进行更大规模、更长期的随机试验,以优化患者选择和手术技术。总之,DCB血管成形术是传统支架置入术的一种可行且有效的替代方法,在复杂病变和特定患者亚组中尤其具有优势,有待进一步的确切证据。