Ferreira Ricardo, Velho Tiago R, Gonçalves João, Sena André, Draiblate Beatriz, Almeida Ana G, Nobre Ângelo, Pinto Fausto
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hospital de Santa Maria, Unidade Local de Saúde Santa Maria, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal.
Centro Cardiovascular da Universidade de Lisboa (CCUL@RISE), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 May 17;12(5):191. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12050191.
Aortic valve stenosis remains the most prevalent valvular pathology in Western countries. Rapid deployment bioprosthesis (RD) has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional valves for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), particularly in elderly and high-risk patients. This study reports the short- and long-term outcomes of RD in patients with isolated aortic stenosis.
A retrospective single-center analysis was conducted on 382 patients who underwent RD-AVR between 2014 and 2020. Data were collected from clinical files and national electronic databases. Primary outcomes included cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamping (XC) times, postoperative complications, and long-term survival.
The mean age was 75.6 ± 5.9 years, with 29.8% of patients over 80 years old and a mean EuroSCORE II of 2.3 ± 1.5%. CPB and XC times were 36.7 ± 10.8 and 27.4 ± 8.1 min, respectively. Postoperative complications included acute kidney injury (AKI, 53.4%), de novo atrial fibrillation (31.9%), and high-grade/complete atrioventricular block with permanent pacemaker implantation (9.8%). In-hospital and 30-day mortality was 1.02% and 2.3%, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was 77%. At 6 months postoperatively, the mean transvalvular gradient was 11.1 ± 4.7 mmHg. At a median follow-up of 6.7 years, no cases of structural valve deterioration and only one case of endocarditis were reported.
In this single-center study, RD in isolated AVR demonstrated favorable short- and long-term outcomes, including no structural valve deterioration at mid-term follow-up. These devices offer a safe and effective alternative to conventional SAVR, particularly in high-risk populations.
在西方国家,主动脉瓣狭窄仍然是最常见的瓣膜病变。快速植入生物假体(RD)已成为外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)中传统瓣膜的一种有前景的替代方案,尤其是在老年和高危患者中。本研究报告了孤立性主动脉狭窄患者接受RD治疗的短期和长期结果。
对2014年至2020年间接受RD-AVR的382例患者进行回顾性单中心分析。数据从临床档案和国家电子数据库中收集。主要结局包括体外循环(CPB)和主动脉阻断(XC)时间、术后并发症和长期生存率。
平均年龄为75.6±5.9岁,29.8%的患者年龄超过80岁,平均欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)II评分为2.3±1.5%。CPB和XC时间分别为36.7±10.8分钟和27.4±8.1分钟。术后并发症包括急性肾损伤(AKI,53.4%)、新发房颤(31.9%)以及需要植入永久性起搏器的高度/完全房室传导阻滞(9.8%)。住院死亡率和30天死亡率分别为1.02%和2.3%。5年生存率为77%。术后6个月时,平均跨瓣压差为11.1±4.7 mmHg。在中位随访6.7年时,未报告结构性瓣膜退变病例,仅报告1例心内膜炎病例。
在这项单中心研究中,孤立性AVR中使用RD显示出良好的短期和长期结果,包括中期随访时无结构性瓣膜退变。这些装置为传统SAVR提供了一种安全有效的替代方案,尤其是在高危人群中。