Suppr超能文献

蜂毒针灸治疗踝关节疼痛的临床证据:临床研究综述

Clinical Evidence of Bee Venom Acupuncture for Ankle Pain: A Review of Clinical Research.

作者信息

Sung Soo-Hyun, Jeong Hyein, Park Jong-Hyun, Park Minjung, Lee Gihyun

机构信息

Department of Policy Development, National Institute of Korean Medicine Development, Seoul 04554, Republic of Korea.

Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Toxins (Basel). 2025 May 21;17(5):257. doi: 10.3390/toxins17050257.

Abstract

The prevalence of ankle pain in adults is 9-15%, with up to 45% of sports-related injuries attributed to ankle pain and injuries. If ankle pain is not controlled in a timely manner, it can lead to ankle instability, resulting in further damage, recurrence of pain, and secondary injuries. The present study aimed to assess the therapeutic potential and safety profile of bee venom acupuncture (BVA) in the management of ankle pain. Ten electronic databases were searched for articles published up to March 2025. We included clinical studies that utilized BVA for the treatment of ankle pain and studies that included pain- and function-related assessment tools. The safety of bee venom acupuncture (BVA) was assessed by extracting adverse events from the included studies and categorizing them according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). A total of 14 clinical studies were selected, of which 9 were case reports, 2 were case-controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and 3 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The conditions causing ankle pain were mostly traumatic (42.9%), followed by inflammatory (21.4%) and neuropathic disorders (14.3%). BVA was applied at concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 0.5 mg/mL, with a per-session volume ranging from 0.04 to 2.5 mL. In most studies, BVA was reported to improve both ankle pain and function simultaneously. Among the 14 studies, four participants reported adverse events following BVA treatment, all of which were classified as grade 1 or grade 2, indicating mild to moderate severity. This review suggests that BVA may be recommended for controlling ankle pain based on clinical evidence. However, the number of high-quality RCTs is limited, and half of the studies did not report side effects, indicating the need for further clinical research to verify its safety and efficacy.

摘要

成年人踝关节疼痛的患病率为9%-15%,高达45%的运动相关损伤归因于踝关节疼痛和损伤。如果踝关节疼痛不能及时得到控制,可能会导致踝关节不稳定,进而造成进一步损伤、疼痛复发和继发性损伤。本研究旨在评估蜂毒针刺疗法(BVA)在治疗踝关节疼痛方面的治疗潜力和安全性。检索了10个电子数据库,查找截至2025年3月发表的文章。我们纳入了使用BVA治疗踝关节疼痛的临床研究以及包含疼痛和功能相关评估工具的研究。通过从纳入研究中提取不良事件并根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)对其进行分类,评估蜂毒针刺疗法(BVA)的安全性。共选择了14项临床研究,其中9项为病例报告,2项为病例对照临床试验(CCT),3项为随机对照试验(RCT)。导致踝关节疼痛的病因大多为创伤性(42.9%),其次是炎症性(21.4%)和神经性疾病(14.3%)。BVA的应用浓度范围为0.05至0.5mg/mL,每次治疗的用量范围为0.04至2.5mL。在大多数研究中,据报道BVA能同时改善踝关节疼痛和功能。在这14项研究中,有4名参与者在接受BVA治疗后报告了不良事件,所有不良事件均被归类为1级或2级,表明严重程度为轻度至中度。本综述表明,基于临床证据,BVA可能被推荐用于控制踝关节疼痛。然而,高质量RCT的数量有限,且一半的研究未报告副作用,这表明需要进一步的临床研究来验证其安全性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f8/12115534/7cccf1ec6756/toxins-17-00257-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验