Shao Yongxiang, Cheng Meng, Hu Conglei, Kong Lingchen, Liang Zilong, Pang Haofeng, Du Haiyang, Yao Liping, Zhang Qian, Liu Fei
Department of Urology, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.
Department of Urology, Air Force Medical Center of PLA, Air Force Medical University, Beijing, 100142, China.
BMC Urol. 2025 May 27;25(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01813-8.
Different surgical managements for parapelvic cysts may vary in efficacy and safety. Considering the distinct characteristics of greenlight laser, this study aimed to compare three treatments for parapelvic cysts: flexible ureteroscopic internal incision and drainage with greenlight laser, or with holmium laser, and retroperitoneal laparoscopic cyst unroofing. The focus was on evaluating and contrasting the advantages of greenlight versus holmium laser in this context.
A total of 62 patients with parapelvic cysts who underwent surgical treatment from January 2018 to January 2023 and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were retrospectively collected. All patients received CT or ultrasound examination, and were diagnosed with parapelvic cysts by radiologists and urologists. Patients were divided into three groups according to treatment: (1) flexible ureteroscopy with greenlight laser internal incision (n = 18), (2) flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser internal incision (n = 21), and (3) laparoscopic cyst unroofing decompression (n = 23). Outcomes of the 3 groups were analyzed. The safety and effectiveness of the three surgical methods were evaluated by comparing the imaging examination data before and 6 months after the operation.
There were no significant differences in age, gender, side, or size of the cysts among the three groups. Shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and fewer postoperative complications were observed in flexible ureteroscopic laser endotomy groups, compared to laparoscopic group.
Flexible ureteroscopic laser internal incision demonstrated several advantages over laparoscopic surgery, including shorter operation time and less blood loss. The greenlight laser exhibited obvious advantage of shorter incision time in the treatment of parapelvic cyst, which made it worthy of clinical application. Our findings might provide evidence to the selection of ideal methods for treating parapelvic cysts.
盆腔囊肿的不同手术治疗方法在疗效和安全性上可能存在差异。鉴于绿激光的独特特性,本研究旨在比较盆腔囊肿的三种治疗方法:绿激光软性输尿管镜下内切开引流、钬激光软性输尿管镜下内切开引流以及腹膜后腹腔镜囊肿去顶术。重点是在此背景下评估和对比绿激光与钬激光的优势。
回顾性收集了2018年1月至2023年1月期间接受手术治疗且符合纳入和排除标准的62例盆腔囊肿患者。所有患者均接受了CT或超声检查,并由放射科医生和泌尿外科医生诊断为盆腔囊肿。根据治疗方法将患者分为三组:(1)绿激光软性输尿管镜下内切开术(n = 18),(2)钬激光软性输尿管镜下内切开术(n = 21),(3)腹腔镜囊肿去顶减压术(n = 23)。分析三组的治疗结果。通过比较手术前和术后6个月的影像学检查数据,评估三种手术方法的安全性和有效性。
三组患者在年龄、性别、囊肿部位或大小方面无显著差异。与腹腔镜组相比,软性输尿管镜激光内切开术组的手术时间更短、术中出血量更少且术后并发症更少。
软性输尿管镜激光内切开术相较于腹腔镜手术具有多项优势,包括手术时间更短和出血量更少。绿激光在治疗盆腔囊肿方面显示出切口时间明显更短的优势,值得临床应用。我们的研究结果可能为选择治疗盆腔囊肿的理想方法提供依据。